|
Annual Reports |
MISCELLANEOUS the present name of the village, namely Elavānāśūr. This author’s name was Tirumalai-Nayinār Chandraśekhara and he was the disciple of Satyajñāna- Dariśanigaḷ of the Meykaṇḍa-santāna of Tiruvaṇṇāmalai. The record is dated in Śaka 1432 and as such the author must have flourished in the 16th century A.D. Memorials of self-immolation.
It may also be mentioned in this connection that in some sculptures of Durgā dating from early Pallava times in the 7th century A.D. as in the Lower rock-cut cave at Trichinopoly, the figure of a man goddess. A record from Mallām in the Nellore district (No. 498 of 1908) states that the person, whose figure is also sculptured underneath it in the act of cutting off his own head, sliced out pieces of flesh from several parts of his body, and finally offered his head to the goddess. Durgā-Bhaṭāri. A few other slabs containing sculptures of a later period depicting such acts of self-decapitation are also found in front of the same temple*. Instances of voluntary human sacrifices in fulfilment of some vows are also found in Tamil literature. Sculptures representing such acts have been noticed in the Kannaḍa and Telugu countries also. Mr. Rice draws attention to the existence of similar figures belonging to the tenth century A.D. during the Gaṅga and later periods (Coorg Inscriptions, Introduction, p.9). Similar sculptures were recently noticed by me at Gurazāla in the Palnad taluk of the Guntur district. The Vīraśirōmaṇḍapa which the Reḍḍi chief Anna-Vēma had built Śrīśailam was possibly meant for such sacrifices (Ep. Rep. 1915, page 93, para. 15). This would throw an interesting light on the forms of propitiation practised by the ardent devotees of god Mallikājuna or his consort Bhramarāmbā, Attention may here be drawn to a Bengali custom mentioned in Rajendralal Mitra’s Indo-Aryans (quoted in Q. J. M. S., Vol. XXIX, p. 505), according to which Hindu women shed a few drops of their own blood from between their breasts as an act of propitiation of the goddess Durgā in fulfilment of a vow made for the recovery of a patient. This seems to be merely a symbolic act of self-sacrifice practiced in earlier times. It is possible that the nōnbu referred to in the present epigraphs might have been of a similar nature and it did not involve actual loss of life. Chiefs of the Durjaya family. _________________________________________________ |
> |
>
|