SOUTH INDIAN INSCRIPTIONS
VOLUME
XVI
TELUGU
INSCRIPTIONS OF THE VIJAYANAGARA DYNASTY
INTRODUCTION
The Telugu inscriptions of the Vijayanagara kings
published in the present volume form but a small fraction of the innumerable
epigraphic records pertaining to them not only in Telugu, but also in Tamil and
Kannada, as the Vijayanagara Empire at its zenith comprised practically the
entire tract covering these linguistic areas of Dekkan. Some of their inscriptions, especially their
copper-plate charters, are also couched in Sanskrit. In this brief introduction only a few points of interest are
outlined.
The Sangama kings
Inscriptions of the first or the Sangama Dynasty are
conspicuously few. Indeed there is none
of the first member of the family, viz., Harihara I, the eldest of the five
brothers, or of Kampana, the next ruler.
The earliest records (Nos. 1 to 3) presented in the volume belong to
Savanna Odeya, son of Kampana by Mangadevi.
Dated respectively in the Saka years 1273 (1351 A.D.), 1275 (1354 A.D.)
and 1284 (1362 A.D.), they fall in the reigns of Harihara I and Bukka I.
Of the two epigraphs (Nos. 4 and 5) of Bukka I, No. 4,
dated in Saka 1274 (1352) A.D.) describes him as purva-paschima-samudradhipati
and as ruling from Dhorasamudra and Penugonda, probably under his elder brother
Harihara I.
Harihara II. the son and successor of Bukka I, is
represented by eight inscriptions (Nos. 6 â 13) ranging in dates between Saka
1304 (1382 A.D.) and 1326 (1405 A.D.).
One of them (No. 8) mentions Bhavadura Odeya as a mahapradhana of
king Harihararaya. He may, in all
probability, be identical with Bhaskara Bhavadura, son of Bukka I, who caused
to be constructed the large tank called Anantarajasagara at Porumamilla in the
Badvel Taluk, Cuddapah District. It has been suggested that the term Bhavadura
is but a varient of the Urdu word Bahadur.
Among the subordinates mentioned of Harihara, Mahanayankacharya
Motta Dorappanayaka administering Balleganacheruvu in Mangumali-sthala under Mahapradhana
Irugappa Dandanayaka who governed over Penugonda-Marjavada figures in No. 9 in
the cyclic year Isvara corresponding to 1397 A.D. No. 11, dated in Saka 1325 (a
mistake for 1323, Vrisha corresponding to 1401 A.D.) mentions Harihararaya, son
of Vira Virupanna as ruling over Rayavaram.
Neither Virupanna-Odeya (I), the brother of Harihara, nor Virupanna
Odeya (II), the brother of Devaraya, is known to have had any sons. If Harihara of the record were a son of
either of the Virupannas, he is hitherto unknown, unless he could be identified
with Harihara III, the nephew of Virupaksha II, whom the former (Harihara)
should have looked upon as his own father.
A record from Srisailam (No. 12) gives a long string of epithets to the king
such as Pandyakulapratishthapanacharya, Cherakulasubhamkara,
Cholanarapatirakshadikshavichakshana, Kudagakandakuddala,
Konkanabhujanagajangalika, Kalingavangadhumaketu, Kambhojakamalaniharapata,
etc., some of which, it may be noted, could be recognized as those assumed by
the Hoysala kings. The king is praised
as Rajavyasa and Rajavalmiki and to have caused the Vedabhashya
to be written, and supported the Saiva and Vaishnava creeds alike. He is besides credited to have driven away
the Turushkas. The statement made in
this epigraph regarding the Vedabhashya is corroborated by a
copper-plate record dated 1386 A.D., which states that the king granted
villages to scholars who helped the sage Vidyaranya in writing the commentaries
on the Vedas.
Nos. 15 to 26 belongs to Devaraya I (called Vira-Devaraya),
son of Harihara II and the younger brother and successor of Bukka II. Nos. 15 and 16 being dated Saka 1299 (1378
A.D.) and 1318 (1396 A.D.) respectively, belong to a period when he was still a
subordinate under his father, and was ruling over Udayagiri-rajya. No. 21 refers to a representation made by
the priests of the temple of Talakantidevi at Devigudi in the Cuddapah
District, to the king on the occasion of his coronation and bears the date Saka
1328, Vyaya, lunar eclipse, corresponding to A.D. 1406, November 25. Obviously this is the date of made by the
king whose date of coronation, according to his copper-plate grant the grant
from Hassan fell on the
5th November, exactly 20 days, earlier than the date of the
inscription under reference. In No. 24,
the king is called Chikkaraya Sri Vira Kumara Devaraya (of the family of) Vira
Harihararaya (Harihararayara Chikkaraya Sri Vira Kumara-Devaraya Maharayalu). Among the dignitaries that served the king
may be mentioned Birudaraju Lakkayyadeva-maharaju and Allalade va-maharaju who
were ruling over Sakali and Peda-Koduru respectively; Peda Lakki-nayudu,
Avubalinayudu and Balagopi-nayudu sons of Mahanayankacharya Kamu
Dorapa-nayaka, perhaps different from his name sake who was also a Mahanayankacharya
but had the family name Motta and served under Harihara ;
Antappadandanayaka and Narasimhadeva-Vodeya, the ministers and
Rachamareddi-Anavota-nayudu who held the nayankara of Inkollu.
The only record of Vijaya-Bukka (No. 26) is dated Saka
1345 (1423 A.D.) and mentions his minister Nagayamatya, son of Chaundapa and
Srimayi and his gifts to the temple at Tripurantakam.
No. 27, the date of which also falls in 1423 A.D.,
mentions the prince Ramachandra as the son of Devaraya. An earlier record of this prince wherein he
figures as ruling over Udayagiri-rajya is cited in the Inscriptions in the
Nellore District, Kanigiri, No. 4, dated Saka 1338 (1416-17 A.D.).
Nos. 28 to 34 are assignable to the reign of Devaraya II.
of them the earliest (No. 28), dated in Saka 1347 (1425 A.D.), mentions the
king as Kumara Devaraya ruling
from Vijayanagara. An earlier date,
perhaps the earliest for this king, is afforded in an epigraph from Barakur. Sambeta Bammayadevamaharaja and Rayadeva
maharaja, sons of Lakkayyadeva-maharaja, are the only feudatories figuring in
the records of this king reviewed here.
The Saluva Kings
No. 36, dated Saka 1399 (1477 A.D.), belongs to Saluva
Narasimha who bears the characteristic titles of the family Medinimisaraganda
and Kathari Saluva. He was still
a Mahamandalesvara and was perhaps a feudatory under Virupaksha who was
also called Praudha Devaraya. The
inscription furnishes the interesting information that Annamarusayya, an
officer under Saluva Narasimha, having visited Araturevula (modern Attirala in
Cuddapah district) on pilgrimage, enquired into the affairs of the temples
there, and seeing that worship in the temples had ceased due to the original
grants having lapsed, made fresh endowments to the temples to revive worship
once again.
To his so Immadi-Narasimha belongs Nos. 37-42 ranging in
dates from Saka 1415 (1493 A.D.) to 1425 (1503 A.D.) in all of which
Narasa-nayaka of the Tuluva family figures as the kingâs most powerful
feudatory. In No. 38 Kesama-nayaka who
was the son of Mahanayankacharya Jamni Chennamanayaka and who held the
Jagatapigutti-sima as nayankara, figures as endowing a village for the
merit of the king as well as of Narasa-nayaka.
No. 39 mentions Narasa-nayaka as ruling over the kingdom at the command
of the king. Among the other
subordinates not already known of this king, may be mentioned Ganti
Kannama-nayudu who held Mulikinadu as nayankara (No. 39) and Bokkasam
Honnappa-nayudu, son of Devappa-nayudu (No. 41).
The majority of the records belong to the Tuluva or the
third dynasty. No. 43 which is
fragmentary and No. 44 which is badly damaged have to be attributed to
Vira-Narasimha, son of Narasa-nayaka.
The former mentions the king as the son of Narasa-nayaka, son of
Isvara-nayaka. He figures as still
ruling on January 14, 1510 A.D. in an inscription from Basrur in the South
Kanara district. This will be adverted to again in the sequel
on the discussion of Krishnarayaâs accession.
Forty-four inscriptions (Nos. 44 â 88) belong to the reign
of Krishnaraya. Of these, No. 45 from
Pulivendla in the Cuddapah district dated Saka 1431, Sukla, Kartika, su. 12
corresponding to 24th October 1509 A.D., is the earliest. An earlier record of this king dated in
Sravana su. 10 of the same year corresponding to Thursday, 26th July
1509 A.D., come from Gulya in the Bellary district.
In his inscription from Kanchi (No. 51), dated Saka 1436 (1514 A.D.),
Krishnaraya is stated to have ascended the throne on the death of his brother
Vira-Narasimha while the Hampe epigraph of the king dated Saka 1430, obviously
a mistake for 1431, Sukla,
Magha su. 14 corresponding to January 24, 1510 A.D. refer to certain gifts made
by him on the occasion of his coronation.
It has been suggested by Dr. Hultzsch that this date might represent the
anniversary of the kingâs coronation rather than the actual date of the
coronation itself. Mr. H. Krishna Sastri wrote in 1908,
basing on the latest date then known for Vira-Narasimha, viz.,the month
Vaisakha of the Saka year 1431,
and the earliest date known for Krishnaraya, viz., the month Kartika of the
same year,
that Krishnaraya must have been crowned sometime between these months and that
the Hampe epigraph was set up sometime thereafter, as indicated by the date of
the record. The Gulya record cited
above which pushes back the earlier limit of Krishnarayaâs reign by about three
months, from Kartika to Sravana (October to July), together with the evidence
of Vijayanagara-samrajyamu, a report prepared by the officers of the atthavanam
at the instance of Venkata which alludes to the kingâs coronation on the day of
Srijayanti in the month Avani of the year Sukla corresponding to Saka 1432
(current) (1509 A.D. August 8),
appears to support Mr. Krishna Sastriâs surmise regarding the date of the Hampe
epigraph. Since the Kanchi inscription
of Krishnaraya is specific in the statement that he ascended the throne only
after his brother Vira-Narasimhaâs demise,
the latter must have died sometime prior to the date of the Gulya inscription,
viz., July 26, 1509 A.D. The latest
sure date for Vira-Narasimha afforded by an epigraph from Vikravandi
in the South Arcot District, viz., Saka 1431, Karkataka, su. 5 corresponding to
1509 A.D., July 22 narrows down the interval between Vira-Narasimhaâs latest
date and Krishnarayaâs earliest to just four days. It is therefore very likely that Vira-Narasimha died sometime
during this short interval. It has been
surmised that the day of Srijayanti cited by the atthavanam was pitched
upon for the coronation of Krishnaraya, it being the nearest and most suited
auspicious day for the kingâs coronation after Vira-Narasimhaâs death.
|
>
|
Am empire-wide exemption of the marriage-tax seems to be
almost the first act that the king affected soon after assuming the reins of
the kingdom. This is recorded in a
lengthy epigraph (No. 47) at Ramesvaram in Cuddapah district, which gives a
descriptive account of the kingâs ancestry as in his copper-plate grants and
enumerates several divisions of his empire, which were benefited by this
remission. A similar remission in
Kamrnnadu (Kamnadu), more or less identical with the present Nandikotkur and
Nandyala taluks in Kurnool district, is recorded in No. 48 from Rangasamudram,
Chittoor district. Saluva Timmappayya
or Timmarasu, the famous minister of the king, and his brother Govindayya are
associated with the king in these records.
The occasion of a laksha-homa ceremony celebrated at
Sivanasamudram where the king was camping on state business in the year 1512
A.D. served also as an opportune time for securing royal assent for the
exemption of all taxes as were in vogue from the days of Chikkodeya on the devadaya
and the brahmadeya lands irrigated by Krottacheruvu in Penugonda-rajya
by the citizens of Bukkapatnam (No. 49).
The literary works Rayavachakamu, Parijatapaharanamu,
Krishnarajavijayamu and the kongudesarajakkalin-charitam as well as
Frair Luizs account, all refer to the siege of the forts of Sivanasamudram and
Ummattur by the king and to his quelling the rebellious chief of Ummattur. The inscription itself seems vaguely to
allude to certain disturbances and consequent non-payment of taxes which
necessitated the kingâs presence at Sivanasamudram.
The year Srimukha (1513 A.D.) appears to have marked the
kingâs setting out on a campaign of conquest and No. 52, dated Saka 1438 (1515
A.D.) and giving a descriptive account of these conquests, records the
conquerorâs visit to Amaresvara, the gifts of Tulapurusha and Ratnadhenu
to the god by the queens Chinnadevi and Tirumaladevi respectively, the kingâs
visit thence to Srisailam and his munificent endowment of the villages
Parumanchala and Atukuru to god Mallikarjuna.
Earlier, he appears to have visited the holy placed of Kalahasti in Saka
1435 (1513 A.D.) No. 50) and Kanchi in Saka 1436 (1514 A.D.) (No. 51),
obviously in the course of his campaign of victory, although there is no
specific reference to his campaigns in the records dated prior to 1515 A.D. The
Kanchi epigraph which gives a descriptive account of the Tuluva kings crediting
the conquest of the Chera, Chola, Pandya, Manabhusha, the lord of Madhura, the
Gajapati and the Turushka kings to Narasa-nayaka, merely gives a long list of
visits and gifts to holy places by the latterâs son, Vira-Nrisimha. Of Krishnaraya, however it states that
having taken over the reins of the government on the demise of his brother, the
king combined visits to the holy places with his campaign of conquest. On the occasion of his visit to Kanchi the king
appears to have endowed gold to the temple of Perarulalapperumal for gilding
the Punyakotivimana of the temple.
However, the details of the grant for this purpose seem to have been
committed to writing only on the kingâs return to his capital on the date of
the record, viz., 1515 A.D. the inscription contains a statement at the end
detailing the expenditure towards gold, copper-plate, mercury and the wages
that were incurred on the work of gilding; but curiously enough portions of the
record giving the details of the amounts so incurred on these counts are left
blank. Apparently when the draft was
prepared the details were not known and later on after the work was completed,
they were not filled up in the blank spaces provided for them. The gilding of the vimana is again
referred to in another record (No. 57), dated Saka 1438 (1517 A.D.), also from
Kanchi, wherein, after an account of the kingâs conquests which took him as far
north as Simhadri-Potnuru, where he set up a pillar of victory, the king is
stated to have returned to Vijayanagara and visited Vishnukanchi when he
granted several villages to the temple and endowed a thousand varahas to
the god and had the Punyakotivimana gilded. Obviously the gilding, which was commenced on the earlier date of
his visit to the holy place, had been completed on the later when the king
visited the place again for a second time.
|
>
|
Among the numerous subordinates of the king, his famous
minister Saluva Timmarasu figures in a number of records and the latterâs
brother Saluva Govindayya is mentioned along with Saluva Timmarasu in No.
47. Another Govindayya, son of
Rachiraju, who held the Puleti-magani as nayankara figures in No.
61. Rayasam-Kondamarasa, the son of
Saluva Timmarasayya figures in No. 63 as donor of two villages. He also caused two tanks to be built, one in
the name of his father and another in his own name at Pittalapuram alias
Kapotapuram in Chejerla. The name
Pittalapuram which is but the Telugu form of Kapotapuram commemorates the
legend of king Sibi who offered his own flesh to save a bird that sought his
asylum. Aptly enough the god of the
place is also named Kapotesvara. By far
the most important personality the figures as a recipient of the kingâs
munificence is the well-known Andhra poet of his court, Allasani Peddana. While the poet is referred to simply as
Peddayyamgaru, son of Alasani Chokkayyamgaru in two records (Nos. 65 and 66)
from Kokatam which, the records state, was granted to the poet by the king as umbali,
No. 68 from Anniyur in South Arcot District calls the poet Andhrakavitapitamaha
Peddiraju and mentions him as holding the nayankara of
Karivachi-sima. A Tamil inscription
from Melpadi in the Chittoor District also records a gift of the village
Tanaippundi to this poet.
Honnapa-nayaka, son of Bokkasam Devapa-nayaka who held
Panemsima as nayankara (No. 46), Lakshmikantarasu, son of Tipparasayya
and Ramayamma (No. 59), Katti Yerrama-nayudu, son of Papa-nayudu (No. 70) who
held Ghandikota-sima as nayankara, Mahanayankacharya Naasa-nayaka son of
Timmi-nayaka who held Kundurpi-sima as nayankara (No. 74), Komara
Vobulnayani-Tippi-nayaka who held Basavanikonda-sima as nayankara (No.
75), Peda-Singama-nayaka, son of Jupalli Rama-nayaka, who held the Chernuru and
Potladurti-simas as nayankara and his brother Malla-nayaka (No. 77), Vakiti
Pedapa-nayudu, son of Bokkasam Pedapa-nayaudu who held the
Kandanavoli-sima as nayankara (No. 82) are a few of the outstanding feudatories figuring in the
records of the king besides those already known. The last date of the kingâs reign is afforded by No. 87 from
Srisailam which records the setting up of stone images of the king and
Demarusayya and one of his own by Avasaram Chandrasekharayya in the
temple of Mallikarjuna at Srisailam in the Saka year 1452, Vikriti, Chaitra ba.
30 when, according to the inscription, the king was still reigning. The details of the date correspond to 1530
A.D. March 28. But by this date
Krishnaraya must have already passed away for, in the Kadaladi Plates of
Achyuta, dated in Saka 1451, Virodhi, Makara ba. 13, Tuesday corresponding to
December 28, 1529 A.D., it is stated that Achyuta succeeded Krishnaraya after
the natural death of the latter. And we know that Achyuta was anointed as
king on October 29, 1529 A.D. (Nos. 97 and 98). The only explanation therefore, for this late date for
Krishnaraya in the Srisailam epigraph would be that the news of his death had
not reached this remote place by that time.
The earliest record in this Volume, of Achyuta who succeeded Krishnaraya,
the latterâs own son Tirumala (Nos. 89 and 90) having predeceased him, bears
the date 1530 A.D., April 30 (No. 91).
|
>
|
It is needless here to recount the several well-known
incidents of Achyutaâs reign as gathered from his records such as his campaign
of conquests recorded in the Kanchi and Kalahasti epigraphs (Nos. 97 and 98)
which besides, record the date of his coronation at Kalahasti. On this occasion were present with the king
his queen Varadadevi and their son Kumara (Prince) Venkatadri who will be
referred to again in the sequel. Noteworthy
among the several gifts made to the god at Kalahasti by the king is a book
called Jnanachintamani (No. 98).
No. 102, also from Kanchi records the interesting fact that the king,
having been appraised of the unequal distribution of the royal endowments made
on the occasion of his coronation to the temples of Varadaraja and
Ekambaranatha by his envoy Saluva Krishnappa-nayaka, took immediate steps to
re-distribute the gift-villages equally between the two temples. He had the Tamil version of the record also
engraved on the walls of the temple. Steps taken by way of remission of taxes on
artisans to encourage their rehabilitation as of old in their former village
from which they had migrated to other places in recorded in No. 104 from
Kanaganipalle in Ananatapur District. A
charter (nammikasasanamu) issued to the people, revising the taxes in
order to encourage their rehabilitation in their former village is contained in
No. 110 from Pulivendla in the Cuddapah District. A remission with retrospective effect, of unjust levies on temple
lands by former rulers is recorded in No. 115.
The proceeds of this remission were made over to the respective
temples. No. 121 mentions Ramaya-mantri
Bacha or Ramaya Bhaskaramatya who held Kondavidu and had the appellation Rajyadhurandhara
and whose sister Chinnamamba, wife Pratapa Yallayarya, caused a tank named
Gopinathasamudra to be built. This
Ramaya-mantri or Ramaya Bhaskaramatya was the fourth of the five sons of
Rama-mantri by Telugama, who were Peda-Timma, Timma-mantri, Surendra,
Bhaskara-chamupati and Bhavayendra respectively. He was the uncle of Ramaya-mantri who was
the son of Peda-Timma, the eldest of the five brothers. The newphew Ramaya-mantri appears to have
succeeded to the governorhsip of Kondavidu after his uncle Bacha or Bhaskaa
after whose name he constructed temples and tanks. He was the author of the treatise on music called Svaramelakalanidhi. No. 126 from Bukkapatnam in the Anantapur
District records, in addition to remission of taxes on marriages, exemption
from taxes on the earnings of Brahmanas also.
Achyutaâs latest date known in the records presented here is Saka 1464,
Subhakrit Chaitraba 6, Wednesday, corresponding to 1542 A.D., April 5, which is
about a year later than his Taramangalam record dated in Kali 4642, Plava,
Chittirai 1, corresponding to 1541 A.D., March 28,
or his Pushpagiri epigraph (No. 123), dated exactly a month later than the
above.
|
>
|
To Sadasiva, the nephew of Achyuta, belong the bulk of the
inscriptions, 150 altogether (Nos. 127 to 277). Although his epigraphs are current from and after Saka 1459
about five years earlier than the latest record of Sadasiva in the present
volume is dated in the year Saka 1464 Subhakrit (1542 A.D.), which was also the
last year of Achyuta. A few points of
interest in his records may be noted here in chronological sequence. Among the various taxes that the temple
villages (devata-gramalu) and the agraharas were exempted from
payment to the royal treasury, but allowed to be utilized for services in the
local temple at Mopuru itself occur durga-varttana and danaini-varttana,
obviously two different taxes (No. 139).
The term usually occurs as durgadanayini-varttana and apparently
represents only one kind of tax. No.
142, dated Saka 1466 (1545 A.D.) records a grant of money at the rate of a mada
and dharana (mada dharanam)
per month for maintaining a perpetual lamp.
The occurrence of dharana in so late a period as this and as a
denomination of a mada is indeed
noteworthy. In Nos. 147 and 148, both
dated Saka 1469 (current) (1546 A.D.), the king is given the epithet Kathari-Saluva. No. 150, dated in Saka 1468 (1546 A.D.)
records remission of the barbers, tax on the deva-grama, agrahara and bamdaravada
villages. The expression bamdaravada
obviously indicates a Government village, the bamdaram (bhandaram)
meaning treasury connoting the Government.
No. 175, dated Saka 1473 (1550 A.D.), mentions the Asvapati-Narapati
and the Gajapati rulers as the three spiritual sons of the pontiff
Santtabhishavritti-ayyavaru and god Mallikarjuna worshipped by them. The term Gajapati came to be recognized
almost as a dynastic epithet of the kings of Orissa at this period. The Narapatis were obviously the
Vijayanagara kings who are famed to have excelled in their infantry the other
contemporary kings. The Achyutarayabhyaudayamu
describes in canto XI Achyutaâs campaign against the Hayapati and his
siege of the fort at Raichur. The term Hayapati
synonymous with Asvapati, can here stand only for the Sultan of
Bijapur. If the term Asvapati in
the record stands for the Muhammadan rulers of the period, as it seems to, it
is indeed noteworthy that the pontiff commanded the universal respect of all
the three rulers alike of his time. In
No. 196 from Vontimitta, dated in Saka 1477 (1554 A.D.), the Araviti chief
Tirumalayyadeva-maharaja, thegrandson of Ramaraja is attributed, besides the
usual birudas, the epithet Chalikkya-naraana. It may be noted in this connection that
Venkata I, also of this dynasty bore the title chalikk-achakravarti. No. 201 from Markapur, dated in Saka 1476
(1555 A.D.), records a grant of various taxes such as yillari, pullari,
ganugari, maggari, mudrayam and andisantisumkam from the 18 villages
enumerated in addition to the lanja-sumkam (tax on prostitutes), the
last collected during the festivals (tirunala-lonu) at Marakapuram. No. 208, dated Saka 1477 (1556 A.D.),
mentions the cash amount derived from the panta-sumkam made over to the
local deities of Santaravuru. The term maharachatevalu
occurring in Nos. 236 and 237 appears to stand for a group of taxes or levies
of which alugu-rukalu formed one.
It is comparable with the term maharachaprayojanam occurring
along with devat-prayojanam in No. 185
Nos. 210, 212 and 213, all from the Rayadurg taluk formerly in the Bellary
District and dated in Saka 1478, Nala, Jyeshthasu. 15 corresponding to 1556
A.D., May 24, refer to the unauthorized and illegal collection of taxes by the
local officials Manihagandlu and Hasanidyagandlu and to the remedial
measures taken by the Government on representations made by the people, to
redress their grievances.
|
>
|
No. 217, recording the obeisance of the merchant
Tirumala-setti, to god Venkatesa, Narasimha, Vamana, Parasurama, Kondandarama
and Kali in eight terse verses (ashtaka) in Sanskrit. The identity of the poet who composed the
verses, however, remains unknown.
A record of considerable interest from the view point of
present day trends in land tenure is No. 254 from Halaharivi, formerly in the
Bellary district. It records a grant of
land for svayamkrishi (self cultivation) to Ramakrishnayya of Nelluru by
Jaggarajayya, son of Mahamandalesvara Tirumalarajayya of the solar race.
The latest date available for Sadasiva, in the records edited here is Saka 1489, Prabhava,
Karttika su. 14, corresponding to 1567 A.D., October 17. His inscriptions are, however, current till
the beginning of 1576 A.D. although after the death of Aliya Ramaraja in the
great battle of Rakshas-Tangadi (known as the battle of Talikota) the latterâs
brother Tirumala seems to have taken Ramarajaâs place in the administration of
the kingdom. Sadasiva was the last of
the Tuluva rulers and the date of his death is not known from inscriptions.
<More>
Home
Page
|
\D7
|