|
APPENDIX
I
Principal dates calculated with the help of
Dewan Bahadur
Swamikannu Pillaiâs
Indian Ephemeris
By
N.
Lakshminarayan Rao, M.A.,
Octacamund.
|
General
No.
|
A.
R. No.
|
Details
of dates with their English equivalents and remarks
|
|
4
|
31
of 1915
|
EASTERN
CHALUKYA
Saka
925, Uttarayana-samkranti
Probably
= A.D.
1003, December 24, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
5
|
707
of 1920
|
18th
year of Rajaraja, (Saka . . . ) Chaitra, su. 9, Monday.
If
this belongs to the reign of the Chola-Chalukya
Rajaraja-Narendra I, the equivalent would be A.D.
1040, March 24, Monday ; f. d. t. 20. But
if it belongs to the reign of Chola Rajaraja II, as
the Saka year which seems to have contained 4
figures would indicate, the equivalent would be A.D.
1165, March 22, Monday; f. d. t. '09. See Appendix II.
|
|
6
|
673
of 1920
|
Saka
965, Subhanu, Uttarayana.
Probably
= A.D. 1043, December 24, Saturday. Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
12
|
737
of 1920
|
15th
year of Vishnuvardhana, Uttarayana (samkranti).
If
this Vishnuvardhana is the same as the one mentioned
in No. 10 of this volume the equivalent would be
A.D. 1087, December 25, Saturday. Details are not
enough for verification.
|
|
13
|
748
of 1920
|
17th
year of Vishnuvardhana, Sravana, punnama, Saturday,
lunar eclipse.
If
this king is the Chola-Chalukya Kulottunga-Chola II,
the equivalent would be A.D. 1142, August 8,
Saturday; '48. On this day there was a lunar
eclipse.
|
|
14
|
746
of 1920
|
17th
year of Vishnuvardhana, lunar eclipse.
Same
remarks as for No. 13 above.
|
|
18
|
336
of 1919
|
26th
year of Vishnuvardhana, Vrischika-samkranti, Sunday.
If
the king
mentioned here is the same as the one in No. 13
the equivalent would be A.D. 1151, October
28, Sunday.
|
|
27
|
596
of 1909
|
WESTERN
CHALUKYA.
Saka
1051, Saumya, Urja (Karttika) su. 3, Thursday
=
A.D. 1129, October 17, Thursday ; (See Appendix II).
|
|
61
|
674
of 1920
|
IMPERIAL
CHOLA.
Saka
1026 Tarana, Sravana, ba. 13, Thursday.
Probably
= A.D. 1104, August 19, Friday ; f. d. t. 30;
Thursday appears to be a mistake for Friday.
|
|
62
|
245
of 1905
|
37th
year of Kulottunga-Choda, Vyaya, Phalguna, su. 1[2],
Wednesday.
=A.D.
1107, February 6, Wednesday ; 72 Vyaya corresponded
to Saka 1028.
|
|
64
|
567
of 1925
|
Saka
1030, . . su.
10, Monday, Chaitra 1
=
A.D. 1108, March 23, Monday ; f. d. t. '36; the
month Chaitra cited here is the solar Chaitra.
|
|
66
|
575
of 1909
|
Saka
1033, Khara, Karttika, su.
12.
Probably
= A.D. 1111, October 15, Sunday.
The date is not verifiable.
|
|
67
|
262
of 1905
|
Sake
1033, Khara, Paushya, su. 9, Monday,
Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1111, December 25, Monday ; f. d.t. '64.
Su. 9 is evidently a mistake for ba. 9 ; see No. 68
below.
|
|
68
|
263
of 1905
|
Saka
1033, 42nd year of Kulottunga-Choda,
Khara, Paushya,
ba. 8, Mondlay, Uttarayana-samkranti
=
A.D. 1111, December 25, Monday ; '64
|
|
69
|
698
of 1926
|
Sake
1034, Dakshinayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1112, June 26, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
70
|
578
of 1925
|
Saka
1034, Chitrabhanu, . . . .14 Uttarayana-samkranti.
The
Saka year cited is evidently a mistake for Sake
1024. Probably
= A.D. 1102, December 25, Thursday ; '27.
The month was Pushya.
|
|
71
|
579
of 1925
|
Saka
1034, Chitrbhanu, Paushya, ba . . , Thursday.
The
cyclic year
Chitrabhanu corresponded
to Saka 1024. The English equivalent of the date is probably A.D. 1103,
January 8, Thursday.
The tithi was 13.
Saka
1037, Jaya, Chaitra, solar eclipse.
|
|
73
&
74
|
316
of 1915
and
327
of 1915
|
The
date seems to be irregular for there was no solar
eclipse in Chaitra or in any other month in the year
Jaya. Other details are not enough for calculation.
|
|
75
|
365
of 1915
|
Saka
1038, Durmati, Karttika, su. 2, Sunday.
Probably
= A.D. 1116,
October 8, Sunday ; f. d. t. '80.
Durmati is apparently a mistake for Durmukhi.
(See Appendix II).
|
|
78
|
817
of 1922
|
Saka
1040, Hevilambi, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1117, December 25, Tuesday.
The details are not enough for verification.
The Saka year was current.
|
|
80
|
815
of 1922
|
Saka
1041, Vilambi, Pushya, lsu. 5, Mondlay,
Uttarayana-samkranti
Iregular.
In Vilambi, Pushya su. 5 fell either on
Wednesday or Thursday and it did not combine with
Uttarayana-samkranti.
|
|
81
|
814
of 1922
|
Saka
1041, Vilambi, Pushya, lsu. 5, Mondlay,
Uttarayana-samkranti
Iregular.
In Vilambi, Pushya su. 5 fell either on
Wednesday or Thursday and it did not combine with
Uttarayana-samkranti.
|
|
82
|
395
of 1915
|
(i)
Saka 1046, Magha, su. 5.
Probably = A.D. 1125, January 11, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification
(ii)
Saka 1050, . . . Bhadrapada, su. 12, Thursday
= A.D. 1128, July 9, Thursday.
|
|
83
|
728
of 1920
|
Saka
1047, Makara, ba.
11, Friday
=
A.D. 1125, January 2, Friday.
The Saka year was current.
|
|
85
|
6
of 1908
|
Saka 1049, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1127, December 25, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
86
|
50
of 1909
|
Saka
1 [0] 5 [0], Ashadha, su. 5, Thursday
=
A.D. 1127, June 16, Thursday ; '72.
The Saka year was current.
|
|
88
|
820
of 1922
|
Saka
1051, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1129, December 25, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
89
|
441
of 1915
|
Saka
1054, Karttika, su. 13, Sunday
=
A.D. 1132, October 23, Sunday ; f. d. t. '47
|
|
90
|
631
of 1920
|
Saka
1054, Karttika, ba. 12, Sunday
=
AD. 1132, November 6, Sunday ; â55.
|
|
92
|
5
of 1908
|
Saka
1055 Ashadha, ba
. . . Mondlay, Dakshinayana-samkranti
= A.D. 1133. June 26, Monday ; the tithi was ba. 7 which was current till â73 of the day.
|
|
93
|
321
of 1919
|
Saka
1055, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1133 December 25, Monday.
Details are not enough
for verification.
|
|
94
|
9
of 1908
|
Saka
1055, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1133 December 25, Monday.
Details are not enough
for verification.
|
|
97
|
350
of 1915
|
Saka
1057, solar eclipse.
In
Saka 1057 expired there was no solar eclipse but in
Saka 1057 current (= A.D. 1134-35) there were two
solar eclipses, one in Ashadha (= A.D. 1134, July
23, Monday and the other in Pushya (= A.D. 1135,
January 16, Wednesday).
One of the two may be the intended date.
|
|
100
|
699
of 1920
|
Saka
1059 (?), Chaitra, su. 2, Mesha-samkranti, Wednesday
= A.D. 1137, March 24, Wednesday ; f.d.t. â47.
It was a day of Mesha-samkranti.
The month was Nija-Chaitra.
|
|
102
|
116
of 1917
|
Saka
1059, 4th year of Kulottunga-Choda, Dakshinayana
= A.D. 1137, June 26, Saturday, which was the day of
Dakshinayana-samkranti.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
103
|
404
of 1915
|
Saka
1059, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1137, December 25, Saturday
which was the day of Uttarayana-samkranti.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
104
|
10
of 1908
|
Saka
1060, Vishu-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1138, March 24, Thursday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
105
|
11
of 1905
|
Saka
1060, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1138, December 25, Sunday, which was
the day of Uttarayana-samkranti.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
107
|
393
of 1915
|
Saka
1061, Asvija, ba. 12,
Monday.
Probably
= A.D. 1188, October 3, Monday ; '84 ;
ba. 12
seems to be a mistake for
ba. 13.
The Saka year was current.
|
|
108
|
705
of 1920
|
Saka
10[62], [8]th year of Kulottunga-Choda, Bhadrapada, su. 5,
Monday, Dakshinayana-samkranti = A.D. 1140, August 19,
Monday ; â68. But
it was not a day of Dakshinayana-samkranti which occurred on
August 27.
|
|
110
|
743
of 1920
|
Saka
1063, 15th year
of Vishnuvardhana, Pushya, ba.
10, Wednesday, Uttarayana-samkranti = A.D. 1141,
December 24, Wednesday ; '73
|
|
111
|
676
of 1920
|
Saka
1064, Makara-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1142, December 25, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
112
|
647
of 1920
|
Sake
1065, Vishu-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1143, March 24, Thursday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
114
and
115
|
848
of 1917
|
Saka
1066, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1144, December 25, Monday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
116
|
41
of 1912
|
Saka
1067, 21st (?) year of Vishnuvardhana, Pushya, su.
11, Tuesday, Uttarayana = A.D. 1145, December 25, Tuesday ;
f.d.t. '66. It
was a day of Uttarayana-samkranti.
|
|
117
|
580
of 1925
|
Saka
1068, Phalguna, su. 11, Thursday
=
A.D. 1147, February 13, Thursday; '22 (See Appendix II)
|
|
119
|
144
of 1913
|
Saka
1069, Prabhava . . . . su. 5, Thursday, Vishu-samkranti.
In
Prabhava neither Mesha-samkranti (A.D. 1147, March 25,
Tuesday) nor Tula-samkranti (A.D. 1147, September 28,
Sunday) fell on su. 5.
The only month in which su. 5 was a Thursday was
Ashadha (= A.D. 1147, June 5, Thursday ; '50)
|
|
120
|
709
of 1926
|
Saka
1069, Prabhava, Vaisakha , su. 13, Monday
=
A.D. 1147, April 14, Monday ; f. d. t. '75
|
|
123
|
40
of 1912
|
Saka,
1071, solar eclipse.
In
Saka 1071 expired (= Sukla), there was no solar eclipse.
In Saka 1071 current (= Vibhava), there was a solar
eclipse which occurred in Chaitra.
This, therefore, seems to be the intended date.
Its equivalent is A.D. 1148, April 20, Tuesday.
|
|
124
|
328
of 1919
|
Saka
1072 Uttarayana-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1150, December 25, Monday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
125
|
568
to 571
of
1925
|
Saka
1073, Urja (Karttika), ba.
14.
Probably
= A.D. 1151, November 9, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
126
|
310
of 1920
|
Saka
1073, Uttarayana-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1151, December 25, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
127
|
332
of 1944
|
Saka
1075, Vishu-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1153, March 24, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verifications.
|
|
129
|
390
of 1915
|
Saka
107[5], Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1153, December 25, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
130
to 132
|
|
Saka
107[5], Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1153, December 25, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
134
|
552
to 1909
|
Saka
1076, Bhava, Marggasira, su. 15, Thursday, lunar eclipse.
Irregular.
In Bhava, there was no lunar eclipse in Marggasira ;
there was one, however, in Pausha but it occurred on a
Tuesday. If
this was the intended date the English equivalent would be
A. D. 1154, December 21 Tuesday.
|
|
135
|
347
to 1915
|
Saka
1077, Jyeshtha, su. 5.
Probably
= A.D. 1155, May 8, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
136
|
566
of 1925
|
Saka
1077, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1155, December 25, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
139
|
329
of 1919
|
Saka
1078, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1156, December 25, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
140
|
854
of 1917
|
Saka
1079, Karttika, ba. 15, Thursday.
Neither
in Saka 1079 expired nor in current, Karttika ba.
15 fell on a Thursday.
In Saka 1079 current (= Dhatu), however, ba.
15 fell on a Wednesday which is the nearest approach
to the date cited. If
this was the intended date the English equivalent would be
A. D. 1156, November 14, Wednesday.
|
|
141
|
318
of 1915
|
Saka
1079, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1157, December 25, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
143
|
114
of 1917
|
Saka
1080, Dakshinayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1158, June 27, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
145
|
847
of 1917
|
Saka
1081, 14th year of Rajaraja,
Dakshinayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1159, June 27, Saturday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
148
|
439
of 1915
|
Saka
1083, Vishu-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1161, March 24, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
149
|
440
of 1915
|
Saka
1083, Vishu-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1161, March 24, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
150
|
795
of 1922
|
Saka
1083, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1161, December 25, Monday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
151
|
443
of 1915
|
Saka
1083, Vishu-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1161, March 24, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
155
|
707
of 1926
|
Saka
1085, Subhanu, Bhadrapada, su. 10, Sunday
=
A.D. 1163,
August 11, Sunday ; '20
|
|
156
|
553
of 1909
|
Saka 1086, Jyeshtha, su. 2
=
A.D. 1164, May
24, Sunday : '87.
|
|
159
|
293
of 1915
|
Saka
10[8] 8, Asvayuja, su. 10, Thursday
=
A.D. 1166, October 6, Thursday ; '32.
|
|
160
|
708
of 1920
|
Saka
1088, 21st year of Rajaraja, Paushya, su. 1,
Sunday, Uttarayana-samkranti.
=
A.D. 1166, December 25, Sunday ; '33
It was a day of Uttarayana-samkranti which commenced
at 11.45 hours after mean sunrise.
|
|
161
|
147
of 1917
|
Saka
1089, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1167, December 26, Tuesday. Details
are not enough for verification.
|
|
162
|
78
of 1917
|
Saka
1089, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1167, December 26, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
166
|
106
of 1917
|
Saka
10[90], Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1168, December 25, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
167
|
107
of 1917
|
Saka
10[90], Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1168, December 25, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
169
|
12
of 1908
|
Saka
1091, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1169, December 25, Thursday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
170
|
856
of 1917
|
Saka
1091, su. 3,
Monday.
Since
the month is not cited we have to take one of the
following as the equivalent : -
(1 A.D. 1166, March 3, Mondlay ; the month was Chaitra.
(2
A.D. 1169, July 28, Mondlay ; the month was
Nija-Sravana.
(3
A.D. 1169, December 22, Monday ; f.d.t. '40 ; the
month was Pushya.
|
|
171
|
658
of 1920
|
Saka
1092, Chaitra, amavasya
=
A.D. 1170, April 18, Saturday.
The date does not admit of verification.
|
|
172
|
657
of 1920
|
Saka
1092, Vishu-samkranti.
Probably
= (1) A.D. 1170, March 25, Wednesday
Or
(2) A.D. 1170, September 28, Monday.
Details
are not enough for verification.
|
|
173
|
545
of 1925
|
Saka
1092, Marggasira, ba. 2,
Friday
=
A.D. 1170, November 27, Friday ; '47
|
|
175
|
394
of 1915
|
Saka
1093, Vishu-samkranti.
Probably
= (1) A.D. 1171, March 25, Thursday
Or
(2) A.D. 1171, September 28, Tuesday.
Details
are not enough for verification.
|
|
176
|
655
of 1920
|
Saka
1093, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1171, December 26, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
177
|
49
of 1909
|
Saka
1093, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1171, December 26, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
178
|
551
of 1925
|
Saka
1094, Vishu-samkranti
Probably
= (1) A.D. 1172, March 24, Friday
Or
(2) A.D. 1172, September 27, Wednesday
Details
are not enough for verification.
|
|
179
|
48
of 1909
|
Saka
1094, Dakshinayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1172, June 26, Monday.
The date does not admit of verification.
|
|
180
|
120
of 1917
|
Saka
1094, Karttika, Punnama, Thursday
=
A.D. 1172, November 2, Thursday ; '48.
|
|
181
|
121
of 1917
|
Saka
1094, Karttika, Punnama, Thursday
=
A.D. 1172, November 2, Thursday ; '48
|
|
182
|
122
of 1917
|
Saka
1094, Karttika, Punnama, Thursday
=
A.D. 1172, November 2, Thursday ; '48
|
|
183
|
123
of 1917
|
Saka
1094, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1172, December 24, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
184
|
704
of 1920
|
Saka
1094, [26]th year of Rajaraja, Paushya, su. 2, Sunday,
Uttarayana-samkranti
=
A.D. 1172, December 24, Sunday on which day the samkranti
began at 20.50 hours. Su.
2 is apparently a mistake for su. 8 which lasted up to 15.50
hours.
|
|
186
|
264
of 1905
|
Saka
1095, Chaitra, su. 9, Vishu-samkranti
=
A.D. 1173, March 24, Saturday ; '89, which was a day of
Vishu-samkranti.
|
|
187
|
703
of 1920
|
Saka
10[95], 26th year of Rajaraja, Chaitra, ba.
13, Friday
=
A.D. 1172, March 24, Friday ; '17.
The Saka year was current (not expired).
|
|
188
|
183
of 1917
|
Saka 1095, Dakshinayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1173, June 26, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
190
|
282
of 1924
|
Saka
10[9]6, Jaya, Vaisakha, su. 15 Thursday
=
A.D. 1174, April 18, Thursday ; '94.
|
|
191
|
308
of 1920
|
Saka
1096, Ashadha, ba. 11,
Wednesday, Dakshinayana-samkranti.
=A.D.
1174, June 26, Wednesday ; '86.
The Dakshinayana-samkranti commenced at 18.15 hours.
|
|
192
|
158
of 1913
|
Saka
1096, Uttarayana-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1174, December 25, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
|
195
|
574
of 1925
|
Saka
1096, Uttarayana-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1174, December 25, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification. (See
Appendix II)
|
|
198
|
553
of 1925
|
Saka
1104, Magha, su. 10, Thursday.
=
A.D. 1183, January 6, Thursday ; su. 10 appears to be a
mistake for su. 11 which tithi ended on Thursday at
10.45 hours of day.
|
|
199
|
562
of 1925
|
Saka
1104, Magha, su. 10, Thursday.
=
A.D. 1183, January 6, Thursday ; su. 10 appears to be a
mistake for su. 11 which tithi ended on Thursday at
10.45 hours of day.
|
|
200
|
563
of 1925
|
Saka
1104, Magha, su. 10, Thursday.
=
A.D. 1183, January 6, Thursday ; su. 10 appears to be a
mistake for su. 11 which tithi ended on Thursday at
10.45 hours of day.
|
|
