APPENDIX
I
Principal dates calculated with the help of
Dewan Bahadur
Swamikannu Pillai's
Indian Ephemeris
By
N.
Lakshminarayan Rao, M.A.,
Octacamund.
General
No.
|
A.R.No.
|
Details
of dates with their English equivalents and remarks
|
202
|
322
of 1919
|
Saka
1108, Magha, ba. 14, Wednesday
=
A.D. 1186, February 19, Wednesday ; f. d. t. '19.
The Saka year was current.
|
203
|
739
of 1920
|
Saka
1109, Asvayuja, su. . , Tuesday.
Probably
= A.D. 1187, September 8, Tuesday.
Since there is space for only one figure
denoting the tithi it may be 5. This
tithi was current practically throughout
Tuesday.
|
205
|
37
of 1912
|
Saka
1117, Magha, su. 3, Thursday
=
A.D. 1196, January 4, Thursday ; f. d. t. '54
|
206
|
309
of 1920
|
Saka
1117, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1195, December 26, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
207
|
845
of 1917
|
Saka
1120, Jyeshtha, su. [1], Vaddavara
=
A.D. 1198, May 9, Saturday ; '01 '
su. 1 was current for a very short time.
It is likely that the figure in the brackets
is 2.
|
208
|
561
of 1925
|
Saka
1122, Phalguna, su.
8, Monday
=
A.D. 1201, February 12, Monday ; '43.
|
209
|
327
of 1924
|
Saka
1124, Dundubhi, Vaisakha, su. 3.
In
Dundubhi there was an Adhika-Vaisakha.
If the Adhika month was intended, the
equivalent would be A.D. 1202, March 28, Thursday ;
if the Nija month was intended, the equivalent would
be A.D. 1202, April 26, Friday.
The details are, however, not enough for
verification.
|
210
|
302
of 1924
|
Saka
1129, Mesha-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1207, March 25, Sunday ; the date does not
admit of verification.
|
211
|
97
of 1909
|
Saka
112, Marggasira, su. 10, Thursday.
There
are three probable dates : -
(i)
A.D. 1200, November 16, Thursday, f. d. t.
'75
(ii)
AD. 1204, December 2, Thursday, f. d. t. '95
(iii)
A.D. 1207, November 29, Thursday, f. d. t.
'82.
|
235
|
267
of 1905
|
Saka
1028, Chaitra, ba. 5, Sunday
=
A.D. 1106, March 25, Sunday ; f. d. t. '70
|
241
|
273
of 1905
|
KAKATIYAS.
Saka
1107, Visvavasu, Pushya, su. 1, Thursday,
Makara-samkranti.
Irregular.
By the tithi the equivalent would be
A.D. 1185, December 24, Tuesday, ’84 ; by the
samkranti the equivalent would be December 25,
Wednesday. In
either case the week day was not Thursday.
|
242
|
300
of 1924
|
Saka
1121, solar eclipse.
In
Saka 1121 expired there was no solar eclipse.
The only solar eclipse in Saka 1121 current
occurred in the month of Magha = A.D. 1199, January
28, Thursday.
|
243
|
575
of 1925
|
Saka
1121, Chaitra, ba.
15, Wednesday
=
A.D. 1198, April 8, Wednesday ; '25.
The Saka year was current.
|
244
|
576
of 1925
|
Saka
1127, Karttika, su. 15, Monday
=
A.D. 1204, November 8, Monday ; f. d. t. 27.
The Saka
year was current.
|
245
|
262
of 1924
|
Saka
127, [Mar]ggasira, ba . . . dasi, Thursday
=
A.D. 1205, December 8, Thursday ; the tithi
was evidently ekadasi which lasted on
Thursday till '43.
|
246
|
177
of 1905
|
Saka
11[3]0, Vibhava, Karttika, su.
15, Monday, lunar eclipse.
In Vibhava, Karttika, su.
15, was not a Monday nor was there a lunar
eclipse on that day ; but in Sravana of that year,
su. 15
fell on a Monday land a lunar eclipse also occurred.
If Karttika is a mistake for Sravana the
equivalent would be A.D. 1208, July 28, Monday ;
f. d. t. '04.
According
to the Madras Epigraphical Report, however,
the Saka year is 11[9]0 in which year the given
details correspond regularly to A.D. 1268, October
22, Monday, when there was a lunar eclipse.
(See App.
II.)
|
248
|
803
of 1922
|
Saka
1131, Mesha-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1209, March 24, Tuesday on which day the
samkranti commenced at 19.40 hours after sunrise.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
249
|
554
of 1925
|
Saka
1131, Chaitra, ba. 2, Samkramana, Wednesday
=
A.D. 1209, March 25, Wednesday ; '18.
|
250
|
281
of 1924
|
Saka
1131, Sukla Asvayuja, su. 2, Wednesday
=
A.D. 1209, September 2, Wednesday ; f.d.t.
'15.
|
251
|
280
of 1924
|
Saka
1131, Sukla Asvayuja, su. 2, Wednesday
=
A.D. 1209, September 2, Wednesday ; f.d.t.
'15.
|
252
|
560
of 1925
|
Saka
1131, Pushya, su. 11, Sunday, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Irregular.
Neither in Saka 1131 current nor in Saka 1131
expired did Pushya, su. 11 fall on a Sunday ; it was
also not a day of Uttarayana-samkranti.
In Saka 1131 expired the Uttarayana-samkranti
occurred on ba. 12 of Pushya. If
this was the intended date the equivalent would be
A.D. 1209, December 25, Friday.
|
254
|
204
of 1905
|
Saka
1131, Sukla, Magha, su. 2, Wednesday
=
A.D. 1209, December 30, Wednesday ; '39.
|
256
|
88
of 1917
|
Saka
1133, Paushya, ba.
15, Sunday.
In
Pushya both of Saka 1133 current and Saka 1133
expired ba. 15
did not fall on a Sunday.
If ba.
15 is a mistake for ba.
5 the equivalent would be A.D. 1211, December
25, Sunday on which day the 5th tithi
commenced at 5 hours 45 minutes after sunrise.
|
257
|
324
of 1915
|
Saka
1133, Magha, su. 7, Thursday
=
A.D. 1212, January 12, Thursday ; '67.
|
258
|
271
of 1905
|
Saka
1134, Angirasa, Karttika, su.
15, Sunday, lunar eclipse = A.D. 1212,
November 10, Saturday on which day there was a lunar
eclipse and the tithi ended at 15 hours 50
minutes after sunrise.
Sunday is evidently a mistake for Saturday.
|
260
|
79
of 1917
|
Saka
1135, Vaisakha, su. 10, Mondlay.
Both
in current and expired Saka year 1135, Vaisakha, su.
10 did not fall on a Monday.
In the latter year the tithi fell on a
Wednesday viz.,
A.D. 1213, May 1.
Somavara is probably a mistake for Saumyavara.
Or if Saka 1135 is a mistake for Saka 1136
which is more likely the equivalent would be A.D. 1214, April 21, Monday
on which day dasam ended at 6 hours 15
minutes after sunrise.
|
261
|
717
of 1920
|
Saka
1136, Bhava, Karttika, su. 8, Sunday
=
A.D. 1214, October 12, Sunday ; '87.
|
262
|
723
of 1920
|
Saka
1140, Sreshtha, su. 15.
Probably
= A.D. 1218, June 10, Sunday.
The details are not enough for verification.
|
263
|
331
of 1915
|
Saka
1140, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1218, December 26, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
264
|
851
of 1917
|
Saka
1142, Vikrama, Chaitra, ba. 15, Thursday,
Vishu-samkranti.
In
Vikrama, Chaitra ba.
15 was not a Thursday nor did the
Vishu-samkranti occur on that day but in the next
year i.e. Vrisha, Chaitra, ba.
15 was not only a Thursday but a day of
Vishu-samkranti.
This latter appears to be the intended date
(= A.D. 1221,
March 25, Thursday ; '46).
|
265
|
188
of 1917
|
Saka
114[2], Vrisha, Karttika.
Vrisha
was either Saka 1143 expired or 1144 current = A.D.
1221-22.
|
266
|
237
of 1905
|
Vyaya,
Karttika, su. 15, Vaddavara, lunar eclipse
=
A.D. 1226, November 5, Thursday ; '79.
But there was no lunar eclipse on that day.
The grant might have been actually made on
the day of the lunar eclipse which occurred on
Sunday, the 9th August but recorded on
the day cited in the inscription.
|
267
|
174
of 1917
|
Saka
1143, Chaitra, su. 15.
Probably
= A.D. 1221, March 9, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
269
|
140
of 1917
|
Saka
1144, Chaitra, su. 10, Monday.
Neither
in Saka 1144, current nor expired, Chaitra, su.
10 fell on a Monday.
But
the details agree correctly for Saka 1145 = A.D.
1223, March 13, Monday, '92.
|
270
|
456
of 1915
|
Saka
1145, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1222, December 26, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
271
|
330
of 1915
|
Saka
1145, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1222, December 26, Tuesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
273
|
325
of 1924
|
Saka
1150, Sarvvadhari
=
A.D. 1228-29.
|
274
|
275
of 1924
|
Saka
115[2], Tarana, Vaisakha, su. 1, Thursday.
The cyclic year Tarana was Saka 1146 (expired).
In this year the given details do not agree
but in the next year Parthiva, Vaisakha su. 1 fell
on a Thursday = A.D. 1225, April 10.
|
275
and
276
|
274
of 1924
and
273
of 1924
|
Saka
115[2], Tarana, Vaisakha, su. 1, Thursday.
The cyclic year Tarana was Saka 1146 (expired).
In this year the given details do not agree
but in the next year Parthiva, Vaisakha su. 1 fell
on a Thursday = A.D. 1225, April 10.
|
277
|
265
of 1924
|
Saka
1152 (?).........su. 5, Thursday.
Details
are not enough for calculation.
|
278
|
606
of 1909
|
Saka
1153, Khara, Jyeshtha, ba.
15, Thursday, solar eclipse.
Irregular.
Jyeshtha, ba. 15. of Khara
was not a Thursday nor was there a solar eclipse on
that day.
|
279
|
60
of 1917
|
Saka
115[3], Magha, su. 5, Thursday
=
A.D. 1232, January 29, Thursday.
|
282
|
134
of 1917
|
Saka
115[7 ?], Vaisakha, su, 3, Thursday.
Neither
in Saka 1157 current nor expired, Vaisakha, su. 3
was a Thursday but in Saka 1158 (expired) it was =
A.D. 1236, April 10, Thursday.
But the correct reading of the Saka year is
1152 = A.D. 1229, March 29, Thursday.
(See Appendix II).
|
283
|
278-a
of 1905
|
Sake
1157, Manmatha, Marggasira, ba. 2, Wednesday
=
A.D. 1235, November 28, Wednesday ; '39
|
284
|
463
of 1915
|
Saka
1157, Uttarayana-samkranti
Probably
= A.D. 1235, December 26, Wednesday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
286
|
720
of 1920
|
Saka
11[5]8. Chaitra,
su. 6, Wednesday.
Neither
in Saka 1158 current nor expired was Chaitra, su. 6,
a Wednesday but it was in Saka 1159 = A.D. 1237,
March 4, Wednesday.
This is probably the intended date.
|
287
|
278-b
of 1905
|
Hemalambi,
Karttika, su. 15, Wednesday.
If
the Saka year is taken to be 1159 the equivalent
would be = A.D. 1237, November 4, Wednesday ; '24.
|
288
|
63
of 1917
|
Saka
1160, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1238, March 25, Thursday ; '05.
|
289
|
65
of 1917
|
Saka
1160, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1238, December 26, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
290
|
55
of 1925
|
Saka
1161, Vikari, Bhadrapada, su. 13, Sunday
=
A.D. 1239, August14, Sunday ; '16.
|
291
|
556
of 1925
|
Saka
1161, Vikari, Bhadrapada, su. 13, Sunday
=
A.D. 1239, August 14, Sunday ; '16.
|
292
|
722
of 1920
|
Saka
1163, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1241, December 26, Thursday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
293
|
324
of 1919
|
Saka
1163, Sivaratri.
Probably
= A.D. 1242, January 30, Thursday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
295
|
254
of 1924
|
Saka 1164, Subhakrit, Vaisakha, su. 5, Thursday.
Probably
= A.D. 1242, April 7, Monday ; '29.
The week day seems to be a mistake.
|
296
|
236
of 1905
|
Saka
1164, Subhakrit, Asvayuja, su.
1 Friday
=
A.D. 1242, September 26, Friday ; f.d.t. '04.
|
297
|
721
of 1920
|
Saka
1164, Uttarayana.
Probably
= A.D. 1242, December 26, Friday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
298
|
607-a
of 1909
|
Saka
1164, Subhakrit, Paushya, su. 3,
Uttarayana-samkranti
=
A.D. 1242, December 26, Friday.
|
299
|
465
of 1915
|
Saka
1165, Ashadha, su.
12.
Probably
= A.D. 1243, June 30, Tuesday.
Details are not
enough for verification.
|
300
|
596
of 1925
|
Saka
1165, Subhakrit, Karttika, su. 15, Thursday
=
A.D. 1243, October 29, Thursday ; '26.
Subhkrit is a mistake for Sobhakrit.
|
301
|
311
of 1920
|
Saka
1165, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1243,
December 26, Saturday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
302
|
826
of 1922
|
Saka
1166, Paushya, ba.
9. 9, Sunday, Uttarayana-samkranti
=
A.D. 1244, December 25, Sunday ; '45.
This was the day of Uttarayana-samkranti.
|
303
|
466
of 1915
|
Saka
1167, Visvavasu, Ashadha, su.
Details
are not enough for calculation.
Saka 1167 expired was Visvavasu = A.D.D.
1245-46.
|
304
|
245
of 1905
|
Saka
1177 (mistake for 1167), Visvavasu, Pushya, su.
Tuesday.
Probably = A.D. 1245, December 26, Tuesday.
Since there is space for only one figure the tithi
was very likely su. 6.
|
305
|
235
of 1905
|
Saka
1168, Parabhava, Chaitra, su. 6, Sunday,
Vishu-samkranti
=
A.D. 1246, March 25, Sunday ; but su. 6 had ended on
the previous day at 14 hours after sunrise ; 6 is
probably a mistake for
7 as correctly given in No. 308.
|
306
|
234
of 1905
|
Saka
1168, Parabhava, Chaitra, su. 6, Sunday,
Vishu-samkranti
=
A.D. 1246, March 25, Sunday ; but su. 6 had ended on
the previous day at 14 hours after sunrise ; 6 is
probably a mistake for
7 as correctly given in No. 308.
|
307
|
244
of 1905
|
Saka
1168, Parabhava, Chaitra, su. 6, Sunday,
Vishu-samkranti
=
A.D. 1246, March 25, Sunday ; but su. 6 had ended on
the previous day at 14 hours after sunrise ; 6 is
probably a mistake for
7 as correctly given in No. 308.
|
308
|
243
of 1905
|
Saka
1168, Parabhava, Chaitra, su. 7, Sunday,
Vaishu-samkranti
=
A.D. 1246, March 25, Sunday
|
310
|
138
of 1917
|
Saka
1168, Paushya, lsu. 5, Thursday, Makara-samkranti.
In
Saka 1168 expired the Makara-samkranti did not take
place either on the tithi or on the week day
cited here. In
Saka 1168 current the samkranti occurred on Paushya
su. 5
but the week day was Monday.
If this is regarded as a mistake the
equivalent would be A.D. 1245, December 25, Monday ;
'40.
|
311
|
241
of 1905
|
Sake
1168, Parabhava, Paushya, ba. 3, Wednesday,
Makara-samkranti
=
A.D. 1246, December 26, Wednesday, on which day ba.
3 commenced at 0.45 hours after sunrise.
|
312
|
563
of 1915
|
Saka
1169, Plavanga, Jyeshtha, su. 13, Vaddavara
=
A.D. 1247, May 18, Saturday ; f.d.t. '01.
|
313
|
257
of 1924
|
Saka
1169, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1247, December 26, Thursday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
314
|
586
of 1925
|
Saka
1169, [Plavanga], Magha, ba. 15, Sunday
=
A.D. 1248, January 26, Sunday ; f.d.t. '51.
|
317
|
537
of 1925
|
Saka
1170, Vaisakha, su. 10, Monday
=
A.D. 1247, April 1, Monday ; f.d.t. '43.
The Saka year was current.
|
318
|
240
of 1905
|
Saka
1170, Kilaka, Karttika, Monday, Karttika-Punnami
=
A.D. 1248 November 2, Monday ; '88.
|
320
|
405
of 1915
|
Saka,
1170, Kilaka, Paushya, su. 10, Monday,
Uttarayana-samkranti.
In
Saka 1170 expired, Paushya su. 10 fell on a Sunday,
not Monday and Uttarayna-samkranti took place on the
previous Saturday.
If Monday is a mistake for Sunday the
equivalent would be A.D. 1248, December 27, Sunday.
The grant was made probably on the occasion
of the samkranti and put on stone the next day.
|
321
|
559
of 1925
|
Saka
1170, Kilaka, Magha, ba.
14, Friday
=
A.D. 1249, February 12, Friday ; f.d.t. '21.
|
322
|
227
of 1905
|
Saka
1170, Kilaka, Phalguna, ba. 8, Monday
=
A.D. 1249, March 8, Monday ; '49
|
323
|
228
of 1905
|
Saka
1170, Kilaka, Phalguna, ba. 8, Monday
=
A.D. 1249, March 8, Monday ; '49
|
324
|
225
of 1905
|
Saka
1170, Kilaka, Phalguna, ba. 8, Monday
=
A.D. 1249, March 8, Monday ; '49
|
325
|
555
of 1925
|
Saka
1171, Ashadha, su. 14, Sunday
=
A.D. 1248, July 5, Sunday ;
f.d.t. '38.
The Saka year was current.
|
326
|
557
of 1905
|
Saka
1171, Ashadha, su. 14, Sunday
=
A.D. 1248, July 5, Sunday ;
f.d.t. '38.
The Saka year was current.
|
327
|
249
of 1905
|
Saka
1171, Saumya, Uttarayana-samkranti.
Probably
= A.D. 1249, December 26, Sunday.
Details are not enough for verification.
|
328
|
221
of 1905
|
Saka
1172, Saumya, Phalguna, su. 15, Thursday
=
A.D. 1250, February 17, Thursday ; f.d.t. '39.
The Saka year was current.
|
329
|
226
of 1905
|
Saka
1172, Sadharana, Vishu-samkranti
=
(1) A.D. 1250, March 25, Friday,
or
(2)
A.D. 1250, September 28, Wednesday.
Details are not
enough
for verification.
|
330
|
82
of 1917
|
Saka
1172, Asvayuja, ba. 8, Thursday
=
A.D. 1250, October 20, Thursday ; '45.
The month was Nija-Asvayuja.
|
332
|
283
of 1905
|
Saka
1175, Sadharana (?) Pushya, su. 5, Thursday,
Makara-samkranti.
The
cyclic year Sadharana corresponded to Saka 1172 ;
but the Makara-samkranti in that year did not occur
on Pushya su. 5.
In Saka 1175 (Pramadin), however, the given
details correspond regularly to A.D. 1253, December
25, Thursday, on which day the samkranti and the tithi
commenced at '79.
The Saka or the cyclic year cited appears,
therefore, to be a mistake.
|
333
|
462
of 1915
|
Saka
1173, Makara-samkranti
=A.D.
1250, December 26, Monday.
|
334
|
571
of 1909
|
Saka
1173, Virodhikrt, Asvayuja, su. 13, Friday
=A.D.
1251, September 29, Friday ; '19.
|
337
|
333
of 1924
|
Saka
1173, Magha, su. 10, Monday
=
A.D. 1252, January 22, Monday ; f.d.t. '03
|
338
|
195
of 1905
|
Saka
1174, Paridhavi, Vaisakha, su. 2, Friday
=
A.D. 1252, April 12,
Friday ; '57.
|
339
|
229
of 1905
|
Saka
1174, Paridhavi, Karttika, su. 15, Friday
=
A.D. 1252, October 18, Friday ; f.d.t. '09.
|
340
|
223
of 1905
|
(1)
Saka 1174, Paridhavi, Asvayuja, su.
Vijaya-dasami, Uttara, Saturday
=
A.D. 1252, September 14, Saturday ; '82.
The nakshatra was Uttarashadha and not Uttara.
(2)
Saka 1175, Pramadi, Chaitra, ba. 10, Tuesday
=A.D.
1253, March 25, Tuesday ; f.d.t. '20
|
341
|
219
of 1905
|
Saka
1175, Pramadi, Karttika, su.
15, Thursday
=
A.D. 1253, November 6, Thursday ; f. d. t. '01
|
342
|
216
of 1905
|
Saka
1175, Pramadi, Karttika, su. 15, Thursday
=
A.D. 1253, November 6, Thursday ; f.d.t. '01
|
343
|
231
of 1905
|
Saka
1176, Ananda, Chaitra, su. 15, Friday, Davana-parvva
=A.D.
1254, April 3, Friday ; the tithi began
rather very late on the day viz., at 13 hours
after sunrise.
|
344
|
564
of 1925
|
Saka
1176, Magha, ba. 5, Friday
=
A.D. 1254, February 6, Friday ; '33.
The Saka year was current.
|
346
|
176
of 1905
|
Saka
1177, Rakshasa, Sravana, su. ;15, Tuesday, lunar
eclipse.
=
A.D.D. 1255, July 20, Tuesday; '95.
On this day there was a lunar eclipse.
|
347
|
210
of 1905
|
Saka
1177, Rakshasa, Sravana, ba. 14, Monday
=
A.D. 1255, August 2, Monday ; '88.
|
348
|
745
of 1920
|
Saka
1177, Uttarayana.
Probably
= A.D. 1255, December 26, Sunday.
Details
are not enough for verification.
|
349
|
700
of 1926
|
Saka
1177, Uttarayana.
Probably
= A.D. 1255, December 26, Sunday.
Details
are not enough for verification.
|
350
|
211
of 1905
|
Saka
1171 (1177), Rakshasa, Magha, ba. 14, Thursday
=
A.D. 1256,
January 27, Thursday ; f. d. t. '14.
|
|