Page
|
General No.
|
Line
of text.
|
For
|
Read
|
219
|
410
|
-
|
The A.R.
No. 607 (b) of 1909 given here is registered as No. 608 in
the Annual Report for 1910.
|
223
|
418
|
Int.
|
The
donor is probably in Eruva chief as in No. 417.
|
231
|
433
|
10
|
Not
read in the published text
|
231
|
433
|
11
|
Not
read in the published text.
|
238
|
443
|
|
For
the published text under this number substitute : -
|
238
|
443
|
10
|
[The
date cited in the record corresponds to A.D. 1278, July 2,
Saturday ; â38.
As a result of this correction, the details of date
and the equivalent given in App. I against Nos. 443, 444 and
445 hold good only for the last two.]
|
240
|
448
|
50-a
|
Omitted
in the published text
|
|
240
|
448
|
50-b
|
Omitted
in the published text.
|
|
240
|
448
|
68
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
69
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
70
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
71
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
72
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
73
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
74
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
75
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
77
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
78
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
79
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
240
|
448
|
80
|
Said
to be illegible
|
|
253
|
468
|
Int.
|
Peddaya
Sahini gave lands to the temple of Visvanatha-Mahadeva who
were the officers of Rudraraja.
|
Peddaya-Sahini,
who were the officers of Rudra . . raja, gave lands to the
temple of Visvanatha-Mahadeva.
|
269
|
500
|
-
|
Oppicherla
|
Vopiicherla
|
273
|
505
|
-
|
The
reigning king was Kakatiya Prataparudra.
|
|
284
|
527
|
-
|
Sattenapalle
|
Narasaraopet
|
284
|
527
|
-
|
Kakatiya
Prataparudra is mentioned as the reigning king in the
earlier record bearing the Saka year 1213, the very first
year of the kingâs reign, while the later record bears the
Saka date 1241 which also falls well within the reign of the
king.
|
285
|
527
|
17
|
Remove
the dots at the end.
|
|
287
|
531
|
-
|
Magallu
|
Mogallu
|
291
|
538
|
-
|
Ivani
|
Imani
|
307
|
559
|
10
|
Numbers
of verses are not found in the original up to verse 8.
|
310
|
560
|
29-a
|
Omitted
in the published text
|
|
310
|
560
|
29-b
|
Omitted
in the published text.
|
|
315
|
570
|
-
|
Purushottapattanam
|
Purushottamapattanam
|
317
|
573
|
-
|
Same
|
Bapatla
|
322
|
583
|
19
|
Not
read in the published text.
|
|
322
|
583
|
20
|
Not
read in the published text.
|
|
322
|
583
|
21
|
Not
read in the published text.
|
|
322
|
583
|
22
|
Not
read in the published text.
|
|
326
|
590
|
-
|
Chiluvuru
|
Chilumuru
|
326
|
591
|
9
|
Said
to be damaged.
|
|
326
|
591
|
10
|
Said
to be damaged.
|
|
326
|
591
|
12
|
Said
to be damaged.
|
|
328
|
596
|
-
|
Peddamudiyam
|
Peddamudiyam
|
330
|
600
|
-
|
Jammalamadugu
|
Kamalapuram
|
360
|
603
|
-
|
Jammalamadugu
|
Kamalapuram
|
332
|
604
|
-
|
In
the absence of the same Chola or of any known ruler of the
Chola family it does not seem proper to consider this
inscription as a Chola record.
The late Rai Bahadur Venkayya was inclined to take
the king Srivallabha of the record as a Chalukya.
|
333
|
606
|
-
|
Proddatur
|
Kamalapuram
|
333
|
606
|
-
|
Text
mentions Erikal-Mutturaju.
|
|
335
|
613
|
-
|
Muttukuru
|
Mutukuru
|
336
|
617
|
-
|
Praddatur
taluk
|
Kamalapuram
taluk.
|
336
|
617
|
9a
|
Not
read in the published text
|
|
338
|
623
|
Int.
|
Lonkula
|
Lonkula
|
341
|
636
|
-
|
Cuddapah
|
Proddatur
|
343
|
640
|
Int.
|
Lonkulas
|
Lonkulas
|
351
|
651
|
-
|
S.
101[3] (h) 17th year of Anantavarmadeva
|
S.
101[2] (13th year of Anantavarmadeva)
|
352
|
655
|
-
|
Anakapalle
|
Bimlipatam
|
355
|
662
|
-
|
[The
date printed at the top of the text of this inscription is
wrong for 1141 which is what is found in the text.
The inscription therefore should be read after No.
713]
|
359
|
675
|
-
|
(A.
R. No. 681 of 1926)
|
(A.
R. No. 680 of 1926)
|
368
|
702
|
5
|
Do.
|
Do.
|
373
|
715
|
Int.
|
Nidumjeruvu
|
Nidumjeruvu.
|
374
|
718
|
4a
|
Omitted
in the published text
|
|
385
|
739
|
6a
|
Omitted
in the published text.
|
|
387
|
742
|
11
|
Lines
12 to 22 of this number do not form part of this record,
their palaeography indicating a much later date.
They must be read after line 12 of Gen. No. 776 (A.
R. No. 560 of 1912) with the following corrections : -
|
393
|
752
|
-
|
Tenali
|
Bapatla
|
395
|
754
|
-
|
Tenali
|
Bapatla
|
396
|
754
|
11a
|
Omitted
in the published text
|
|
407
|
776
|
-
|
Lines
12 onwards of the published text of Gen. No. 742 as
corrected above have to be read after line 12 of this
Number.
|
Appendix
I
|
p.
ii
|
70
|
-
|
Add
su. Before 14.
|
|
p.
ii.
|
71
|
-
|
For
the English equivalent and remarks substitute the following
: - âThe English equivalent of the dates probably A. D.
1103, January 1, Thursday.
The letters in 1. 4 of the text would indicate that
the tithi may be saptami which was current on
the date given above : f. d. t. â80.
|
p.
viii
|
207
|
-
|
Omit
the last sentence beginning with âIt is likelyâ etc.
|
p.
xiv
|
332
|
-
|
Omit
the last sentence beginning with âThe cyclic yearâ etc.
|
p.
xvi.
|
367
|
-
|
For
Friday read Saturday and delete the last sentence.
|
p.
xviii
|
426
|
-
|
For
the entry found under this number substitute Saka 1192,
Pramoduta, Ashadha, ba. 15, Ma (Mandavara = Saturday) = A.
D. 1270, July 19, Saturday ; â64.
|