The second period in Vikrama-Chola’s career is marked in his inscriptions by the statement that hestayed for some time in the Vengai-mandalam and conquered the Northern region.  The Pithapuram inscription of Mallapadeva alludes to the same event in stating that he ruled over Vengi before he went to govern the Choda country.  Dr. Fleet has already concluded from this that he must have held the office of viceroy of vengi in succession of his brother Vira-Choda.[22] On the strength of the new materials which are now available, it may be added that the period of his viceroyalty probably extended to the date of his coronation in A.D. 1118, and that it cannot have commenced before A.D. 1092-93, the latest known date of his elder brother Vira-Choda.[23] The statement of the Pithapuram inscription of Mallapadeva that, after the departure of Vikrama-Choda to the Chola country the country of Vengi became devoid of a ruler suggests that his absence resulted in political troubles.  The Pithapuram inscription of Prithvisvara reports that Kulottunga I. bestowed the Vengi sixteen-thousand on “his adopted son” Choda of Velanandu.[24] An inscription of this chief at Draksharama shows that in A.D. 1120-21 he was a vassal of the Western Chalukya king Vikramaditya VI.[25] Who took advantage of Vikrama-Chola’s absence in the Chola country as co-regent of his father and of the subsequent death of Kulottunga I. for conquering the Vengi to Choda of Velanandu, but that the latter became a dependent of Vikramaditya VI. Who took advantage of Vikrama-Chola’s absence in the Chola country as co-regent of his father and of the Vikramaditya VI. At Draksharama range from A.D. 1120-21[26] to 1123-24.[27]  Shortly after, Vikrama-Chola must have re-conquered his northern dominions.  For, two inscriptions of his reign at Chebrolu and Nidubrolu are dated in A.D. 1127 and 1135.[28]

The third important point in Vikrama-Chola’s life is the date of his coronation as Chola king or, apparently, as co-regent of his father Kulottunga I., which according to Professor Kielhorn took place on (Approximately) the 29^th June A.D. 1118.[29]  In the Pithapuram inscription of Mallapadeva this event is referred to by the statement that “he went to protect the Choda-mandala.”[30]  The Tanjore inscription of his 4^th year uses in this connection a passage which is taken over from the inscriptions of Kulottunga I.[31]  Other inscriptions say that he went from the Northern to the Southern region, adopted the crest of the tiger, and put on the hereditary crown.[32]  In the introductory remarks to the inscriptions of Kulottunga I. I stated that his reign must have ended about A.D. 1119.  Hence he appears to have died shortly after the date of Vikrama-Chola’s coronation.

The Chellur plates of Kulottunga II. assign only 15 years to the reign of Vikrama-Chola.[33] But an inscription at Sevilimedu belongs to his 16^th year,[34] and one of the 17^th year at Nidubrolu, as calculated by Professor Kielhorn, is dated on the 18^th April A.D. 1135.[35]  The Chellur plates of Vikrama-Chola’s successor Kulottunga-Choda II. are dated at an equinox in Saka-Samvat 1056, which would prima facie correspond to A.D. 1133 or 1134 ; but Professor Kielhorn has shown that Saka-Samvat 1056 is an error of the composer of the inscription for Saka-Samvat 1065, and that the date corresponds to the 24^th March A.D. 1143.[36]

Parakesarivarman, alias Vikrama-Choladeva, had the surname Tyagasamudra, ‘the ocean of liberality,’ which occurs in the Pithapuram inscription of Mallapadeva[37] and in the Vikkirama-Solan-Ula.[38]  The Sevilimedu inscription of the 16^th April A.D. 1134[39] contains the synonymous surname Tyagavarakara and another viz. Akalanka, ‘the spotless one.’[40] The latter is employed for Vikrama-Chola in the Kulottunga-Solan-Ula.[41]  As Mr. Venkayya informs me, it also occurs twice in the Kalingattu-Parani (ix. Verses 7 and 16), where it is doubtful whether Kulottunga I. or Vikrama-Chola is meant by it.  In a Telugu inscription at Chebrolu, Vikrama-Chola assumes the same birudas which had been borne by his father.[42]  He also inherited from the latter the title Tribhuvanachakravartin,[43] whch is prefixed to his name in all his Telugu and Tamil inscriptions, with theexception of an inscription of the 5^th year (No. 130 of 1895), where he is called Udaiyar, and of two inscriptions of the 7^th and 14^th years (Nos. 258 and 318 of 1901), where he is styled Chakravartin.

Of the inscriptions opening with poomadhu punara those of the 5^th to 9^th years[44] mention as Vikrama-Chola’s queen Mukkokkilanadigal, and those of the 9^th to 15^th years[45] Tribhuvanamulududaiyal.  Hence Mukkokkilanadigal must have died in the course of the 9^th year, i.e., A.D. 1126-27.  The inscriptions beginning with poomaalai midainthu corroborate this fact.  For, those of the 4^th to 8^th years[46] mention as his chief queen Mukkokkilanadi and as his favourite[47] Tyagapataka, surnamed Tribhuvanamulududaiyal, and five of them (Nos. 3 – 7) state besides that Mukkokkilanadigal shared his throne.  In those of the 11^th and 15^th years[48] she is not named any more, but Tyagapataka, surnamed Tribhuvanamulududaiyal, is mentioned in the first place, next to her Dharanimulududaiyal, and at the end Tribhuvanamulududaiyal (i.e., Tyagapataka) is stated to have shared his throne.  This shows that she succeeded the defunct Mukkokkilanadigal as chief queen, while for herself a fresh substitute was appointed in Dharanimulududaiyal.

Home Page