The Indian Analyst

South Indian Inscriptions



Volume - III




Part - I

Inscription at Ukkal





Part - II

Kulottunga-Chola I

Vikrama Chola

Virarajendra I

Kulottunga-Chola III

Part - III

Aditya I

Parantaka I


Parantaka II



Aditya II Karikala

Part - IV

copper-plate Tirukkalar


Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27





Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India


Miscellaneous Inscriptions From the Tamil Country



From the death of Parantaka I., which must have occurred about the year A.D. 953, to the accession of thegrat Rajaraja I in A.D. 985, Chola history is obscure.  During this period of 33 years there were five princes who must have occupied the throne.  The irregular order of the succession suggests that there must have been internal feuds among the different members of the royal family.  We have seen above that the eldest son of Parantaka I, prince Rajaditya, lost his life in the battle of Takkolam before the death of his father.  Therefore, this prince could not have reigned over the Chola dominions, though it is stated in the Leyden plates that he became king after Parantaka I.  It is significant that the Tiruvalangadu grant does not make him a ruler.

Parantaka I was perhaps succeeded by his second son Rajakesarivarman Gandaraditya.  Some inscriptions of a “Madiraikonda Rajakesarivarman” have been ascribed to Gandaraditya[1].  One of these which is dated in his 8th year (No. 112) mentions Alvar Arikulakesarideva.  The epithet Alvar is taken to be one of respect.  It may also indicate that he was dead at the time.  Another is dated in the 17th year of this king.  No event of any importance seems to have taken place in his reign.  A part of the Chola dominions must have been under the Rashtrakutas.  The Chola power was, for the time being, eclipsed.  Hence the paucity of inscriptions during his reign.  Some religious hymns extant in Tamil under the authorship of Gandaraditya are attributed to him.  These show that he must have been a king with a religious bent of mind.  Gandaraditya’s queen was Udaiyapirattiyar alias Madevadigalar sembiyan Madeviyar who bore him a son called Madhurantaka Uttama-Chola.  At the time of Gandaraditya’s death, Uttama-Chola must have been a young boy, as he was set aside in the order of succession till three kings after Gandaraditya had ruled and died.  His mother survived her husband for a long time.  She seems to have been a pious lady, as she figures in several inscriptions, making donations to various temples.

If Arikulakesari, Arikesari, Arinjaya or Arindama, died before the 8th year of Gandaraditya as inferred already, the next king must have been a son of Arikulakesari who, as the Anbil plates say, was prince Sundara-Chola born of a Vaidumba princess.  He succeeded to the Chola throne under the name of Parantaka II., and bore the titles Rajakesarivarman[2] and Rajendra.  In his stone inscriptions Sundara-Chola assumes the epithet “Pandiyanaichuram-irakkina”, i.e., who caused the Pandya king to enter the forest.  The large Leyden grant records that he fought a sanguinary battle at Cheur, but it does not mention the name of the enemy.  It also says that his son Aditya II., while yet a boy, played sportively with Vira-Pandya, as a lion’s cub with an infuriated elephant.  Therefore, it may be presumed that Aditya-Karikala was the chosen heir-apparent and that Sundara-Chola’s adversary mentioned above was the Pandya king Vira-Pandya.  It is also worthy of note that after Parantaka  I, Sundara-Chola was the next king that fought with the Pandyas.  In an inscription of the reign of Rajaraja I, on eof the generals of Sundara-Chola named Parantakan Siriyavelar alias Tirukkarrali Pichchan of Kodumbalur is said to have died in a battle-field in Ceylon in the 9th year of Ponmaligai-tunjina-devar[3], i.e., Parantaka II., the father of Rajaraja I.  This campaign in which the general of Sundara-Chola lost his life must have occurred during the reign of the Singhalese king Mahinda IV., in whose reign, as stated in the Mahavamsa (Chapter LIV), there was a fight with Vallabha[4], (i.e., the Chola king), in which it is stated, that Mahinda’s general defeated the Chola army.  The date ascribed by Wijesinha to Mahinda IV does not fit in with the time of Parantaka II., but if we deduct the error of 23 years which, according to Dr. Hultzsch has crept into this part of the chronology of the Mahavamsa, Mahinda’s reign would fall into the same period as that of Sundara-Chola.[5]  It is interesting to note that thegeneral Siriyavelar or Siruvela was a member of the royal family being the son of the daughter of king Parantaka I who was perhaps identical with the Chola princess Anupama, the queen of Smarabhirama of the Irungola race (No. 121).  The Anbil plates[6] which are dated in the 4th year of this king’s reign, mention a Brahman minister of his named Aniruddha-Brahmadhiraja.

As stated already, Sundara-Chola is referred to in later Chola inscriptions as pon-maligaitunjina devar, i.e., the king who died in the golden palace.  He was a very powerful ruler, much loved by his subjects.  The Tiruvalangadugrants says that his subjects believed him to be Manu come to the earth to establish his laws which had become lax under the influence of the Kali age.  His queen was Vanavanmahadevi[7] who committed sati at the death of her husband.  Her daughter Kundavai, who had married a Pallava chief named Vandyadevar set up an image of her in the temple at Tanjore.

If Gandaraditya ruled for at least 17 years – that being the latest regnal year obtained from inscriptions from him – and Parantaka I died in 947 A.D., not taking into account the date of a doubtful inscription which gives the 46th year of his reign, the accession of Sundara-Chola Parantaka II will fall in or about 964 A.D. which coincides with the accession of Udaya III of Ceylon, as given in Wijesinha’s translation of the Mahavamsa.  Sundara-Chola’s latest year of reign as given in his inscriptions is the 5th.  But from a later inscription of the time of Rajaraja I we learn that in the 9th year of Sundara-Chola Parantaka II a deadly battle was fought in Ceylon, perhaps with Udaya III, in which a general of Sundara-Chola, by name Siriyavelan died.  Perhaps, Sundara-Chola died soon after and we may for the sake of a tentative chronology give him a reign of 10 years.  This brings us to A.D. 974.

Between him and Uttama-Chola, the son of Gandaraditya, must be accommodated Parakesarivarman Aditya II Karikala, a son of Sundara-Chola and elder brother of Rajaraja I, and Parthivendravarman, Parthivendradivarman, Parthivendradhipativarman, Parthivendra Adityavarman, Parakesari Vendiradivarman or the Paramamaharaja Rajamarayar.  Both these kings claim the epithet, ‘who took the head of Pandya or Vira-Pandya – evidently the same Pandya king who was at war with Sundara-Chola Parantaka II – and the title Parakesarivarman.  Inscriptions of the former are very few and found only in the south, the latest regnal year being the 5th.  Of the latter, there are many in Tondai-mandalam and the latest regnal year is the 13th.  Parthivendra Adityavarman may have been a prince of the royal family and Viceroy of Tondai-mandalam.  Aditya Karikala appears to have been the actual successor.  He reigned for 6 years and was succeeded in 969 A.D. by Parakesarivarman Uttama-Chola, the son of Gandaraditya.  The circumstances under which the crown instead of going to Arunmolivarman Rajaraja I, the younger brother of Aditya II Karikala, went to uttama-Chola Madhurantaka are explained in the Tiruvalangadu plates.

The successions of Chola kings from Vijayalaya to Sundara-Chola Parantaka II have so far presented no difficulty.  The statement of the Tiruvalangadu plates regarding the reigns of the princes Rajaditya alias Kodandarama and Arikulakesarin alias Arinjiga or Arindama, sons of Parantaka I, cannot be accepted literally.  The one died as Viceroy of Tondai-mandalam even before his father and the other during the reign of Gandaraditya.  Before, therefore, going on to the reign of Uttama-Chola, it is necessary to fix approximately at any rate the period of rule of Sundara-Chola who succeeded Gandaraditya under the surname Rajakesarivarman[8] and of his son Parakesari Aditya II Karikala.  Sundara-Chola’s latest year of reign as given in his inscriptions is the 5th[9].  But we have seen above that in the 9th year of his reign a fierce battle was fought in Ceylon with the king of that island and that the Chola general Siriyavelan fell in it.  This shows that Sundara-Chola should have reigned at least for nine years or roughly ten years, though his dated inscriptions which are later than his 5th year are not forthcoming.  When did Sundara-Chola succeed to the throne?

Parakesarivarman  Aditya II, surnamed Karikala and Rajaraja I surnamed Arunmolivarman were the two sons of Parantaka II, and Kundavai, his daughter.  The Leyden plates say that Aditya II as a boy played supportively in battle with Vira-Pandya and was his chosen successor to the Chola throne.  In inscriptions he is referred to as Parakesarivarman who took the head of Vira-Pandya.  It is also stated that he killed the Pandya king in battle and set up his lofty head as a pillar of victory[10].  He seems to have had a short reign only, as noted in the sequel, and nothing else worthy of note is recorded of him in inscriptions.

We have stated that Parakesarivarman Uttama-Chola Madhurantaka was the son of Gandaraditya and that after the death of his father, he had to wait to ascend the throne till his cousin brother Sundara-Chola and the latter’s son Aditya II Karikala had reigned and died.  It might have been so for the reason that he was an infant at the time of his father’s death, or that the troubled state of the country required a man of maturer years at the helm of affairs.  At any rate, his claim was set aside for the time being.  Contrary to the usual order, according to which he ought to have been a Rajakesarivarman, his predecessor Aditya II being Parakesarivarman, he too was called a Parakesarivarman, evidently because he was the son of a Rajakesarivarman and succeeded to the throne not by the right he possessed but at the request of his cousin’s son Rajaraja I who was the chosen successor.  For, according to the Tiruvalangadu plates, after the death of Aditya II Karikala, the people wanted Arunmolivarman his brother to be their king, but that noble prince refused to accept the offer saying that so long as his uncle Uttama-Chola was desirous of dominion, he would be satisfied with the heir-apparentship[11].

In the Mahalingasvamin temple at Tiruvidaimarudur, there is an inscription which couples the 13th year of Uttama-Chola with Kaliyuga 4083 thus yielding 969 A.D. as the initial date of his reign.  Uttama-Chola seems to have reigned for at least 16 years, which is the date quoted in the Madras Museum plates of this king.

Rajaraja’s achievements are fully described in the introduction to Volume II by Mr. Venkayya.  His son was Rajendra Chola I, who was a greater monarch than his father and carried the Chola arms into regions never penetrated before.  During the lifetime of his father he seems to have been entrusted with the affairs of the country.  No inscriptions of Rajendra-Chola prior to his third regnal year are found.  Evidently, during these three years, he was ruling as co-regent with his father.  According to Professor Kielhorn the reign of Rajendra-Chola commenced between 27th March and 7th July 1012 A.D[12].

Between the third year and the twelfth he seems to have undertaken and carried out successfully a vast scheme of conquests in many directions.  In some at least of these, he merely acted as a deputy of his father.  When he ascended the throne he found the Chola power firmly established.  He had only to carry on to its legitimate conclusion the ambitious scheme of expansion started in the previous reign.  Before his father Rajaraja could embark on his career of conquests he had to enlist and train up an army, but Rajendra-Chola had inherited “the great warlike army” whose services are referred to in every inscription.  From some of his Tamil inscriptions it is learnt that this army of his was commanded by Solamuvendavelan and that Narakkan Raman the commander of Rajaraja’s forces and the superintendent of the building operations of the Brihadisvara temple at Tanjore continued to hold the same office till at least the 32nd year of Rajendra-Chola[13].  His inscriptions up to the 5th year mention the conquests of Idaiturai-nadu, Vanavasi, Kollippakkai, Mannaikkadakkam and Ceylon.  Idaiturainadu has been identified with Ededore “2,000” lying between the rivers Krishna and Tungabhadra comprising a large part of the present raichur district.  Vanavasi is identical with Banavasi in the North Kanara district and Kollippakkai must have been included in the Western Chalukya kingdom somewhere in the Hyderabad State, for it was set on fire by Rajadhiraja I in the course of a war against Somesvara I and Vikramaditya VI, and is mentioned as Kollipake in an inscription of Jayasimha II[14].  The capture of Kollikppakkai must have been effected as a result of the war against the Western Chalukya Irivabedanga Satyasraya conducted under the direct leadership of Rajendra-Chola while Rajaraja was yet living.  A record of Uttattur states that in this war a certain Rajamalla Muttaraiyan who was placed in charge of the elephant troops was killed while piercing the elephant of Satyasraya under the orders of the king.  This must have happened on the occasion when, according to the Hottur inscription[15], “Nurmadi-Chola[16] Rajendra (i.e., Rajendra-Chola I) had collected a force numbering 900,000, had pillaged the whole country, had slaughtered the women, the children and the Brahmanas and taking the girls to wife, had destroyed their caste.”  The Hottur record is dated in A.D. 1007, but the Uttattur inscription belongs to the 3rd year (A.D. 1013-14) of Rajendra-Chola I.  We cannot help remarking with regret on the striking infringment of the ancient moralities of war by this king, however great his military achievements were.  In place of Mannaikkadakam the Kanyakumari inscription states that Rajendra-Chola made Manyakheta the playground for his armies and accordingly it looks as if Mannaikkadakkam is identical with Manyakheta, as already suggested by me in Ep. Ind., Vol. XVII.  Mannaikonda-Chola seems to be one of the surnames assumed by the king in commemoration of his conquest of Manyakheta (also known as Mannaikadakkam or simply Mannai).  Under this name a pavilion was erected in the Siva temple at Tiruvorriyur[17].  In all probability Rajendra-Chola I had to quell some insurrections in these places.

During the reign of Rajraja I, the Chola authority was firmly established over the northern half of Ceylon and this is proved by the existence of his inscriptions there and by the grant of revenues of certain villages in Ceylon to the temple at Tanjore which was built by him.  Rajendra-Chola I claims in his inscriptions “to have seized the crown of the king of Ilam on the tempestuous ocean, the exceedingly fine crown of his queens, the beautiful crown and the pearl necklace of Indra which the king of the South, i.e., the Pandya had previously deposited with that king of Ilam and the whole of Ila-mandala on the transparent sea.”  That the Pandya king deposited his crown and apparel with the king of Ceylon is mentioned in the 53rd chapter of the Mahavamasa and the Pandya inscriptions mention the necklace of Indra as an heirloom of Pandya kings.  According to the account given in the Mahavamsa, king Mahinda V, in the 36th year of his reign, was captured together with his queen by the Chola army and sent as prisoner to the Chola king.  Among the booty was the crown that was preserved by inheritance, the priceless diamond bracelet that was a gift of the gods, the sword that could not be broken and the sacred fillet.  King Mahinda V died in the 48th year of his accession in the Chola country after spending twelve years in captivity.  So, it becomes clear that Rajendra-Chola completed the conquest of Ceylon  which was begin in the reign of his father.  Thereafter for several years Ceylon formed a province of the Chola empire and was surnamed Mummadi-Solamandalam, after the well-known surname Mummadi-Chola of Rajaraja I.  According to the Mahavamsa these events took place in A.D. 1036, while the Tamil inscriptions show that they must have happened before 1017 A.D.  Professor Hultzsch has shown in his article entitled “Contributions to Singhalese chronology” that there is an error of some 23 years in the chronology of this part of the Mahavamsa.  Applying this correction, the two accounts which of course refer to the same events, can be made to synchronise.

Between the 5th and the 6th years of Rajendra-Chola’s reign, the province of Malabar was also added to his conquests.  The Tiruvalangadu plates state that Rajendra-Chola appointed his son Chola-Pandya as Viceroy of the Pandya country, as well as of the newly conquered Kerala dominions.  He seems to have adopted this step seeing that the Pandyas had ever been a source of trouble to the Cholas from the time of Parantaka I.  The Chola Pandya viceroy appointed by him has been identified with Jatavarman Sundara-Chola-Pandya whose Mannarkoyil inscription has shown that he was ruling contemporaneously with Rajendra-Chola I.  It may be noted that the appointment of members of the Chola family as viceroys of conquered territories started by this king was continued in the successive reigns[18].

Between his 7th and 9th year Rajendra-Chola was engaged in subduing the seven and a half lakhs country of Irattapadi.  This was the country of the Western Chalukya kings ruled over at this time by Jayasimha II (A.D. 1018-1042).  In his own inscriptions, Jayasimha claims to have defeated the Cholas.  As both of them boast of having defeated each other, the fact ought to have been either that the success was on both sides alternately or that neither of the two obtained lasting advantage.  Along with the Keralas he is stated to have taken possession of the island of Sandimat.  What this island is, is not known.

The inscriptions of his twelfth year mention a number of places, which do not appear in the list of conquests mentioned in the records of his ninth year.  During these three years, he must have carried on an extensive campaign.  He is said to have taken Sakkarakottam, Maduramandalam, Namanaikkonam, Masunidesam and Panchappalli ; to have defeated a certain Indraratha of the lunar race at Adinagar and to have taken him and his family captive ; to have captured Odda-vishaya and Kosalai-nadu ; to have defeated Dharmapala and annexed Dandabutti ; to have subdued Ranasura of Takkana-Ladam ; to have overcome Govindachandra of Vangaladesa ; to have put to flight Mahipala and to have taken Uttara-Ladam and the Ganga.

Of the places mentioned here, it may be noted that Sakkarakottam has been identified by Rai Bahadur Hira Lal with Chakrakota, 8 miles distant from Rajapura in the Bastar State, which was under the rule of king Dharavarsha when Kulottunga I was the Chola sovereign. Dr. Hultzsch is of opinion that Maduramandalam is different from the Pandya country and that it must refer to the northern Mathura on the Yamuna river.[19]  Here it may be noted that one of the kings of Rajapura called himself Madhurantakadeva perhaps on account of his capture of Madhura.  It is not likely that he could have marched against Madhura of the south to earn this title.  Consequently, it is reasonable to suppose that Madhura or Maduramandalam was the name of a district not far from Chakrakota bordering on the Vengi country.  Namanaikkonam, Panchapalli and Masunidesam have not yet been identified.  Professor Kielhorn suggests that Indraratha of the lunar race captured by Rajendra-Chola at Adinagar may be identical with that Indraratha who is mentioned in the Udaipur inscription as an enemy of Bhojadeva of Dhara.  Odda-vishaya is the province of Orissa and Kosalai-nadu is southern Kosala.  Dandabutti and its ruler Dharmapala are not known from any other sources.  Mr. R. D. Banerji is of opinion that the Takkana-Ladam of the Tamil inscriptions is distinct both from Gujarat (Lata) and the territory of southern Berar (Virata), and that is should correspond to Dakshina-Radha a part of modern Bengal.[20] Uttara-Ladam must, accordingly, denote the northern part of it.  Mahipala whom the Chola king deprived of his elephants and women, is identified by Professor Kielhorn with the Pala king Mahipala I.

Most of the places mentioned here were conquered by Rajendra-Chola I in his campaign against the north for the purpose of bringing the sacred water of the Ganges, which earned for him the title Gangaikonda-Chola.  The object of Rajendra-Chola in undertaking this campaign is referred to in the Tiruvalangadu grant thus[21] : -

“This light of the solar race, laughing at Bhagiratha who had brought down the Ganges to the earth from heaven by the power of his austerities, wished to sanctify his own country with the water of the Ganges.  Accordingly, he ordered the commander of the army, who had powerful battalions under his control, who was the resort of heroism and the foremost of diplomats, to subdue the enemy kings occupying the countries on the banks of that river.”

The conquest of Northern India by the Cholas must have taken place in 1023 A.D. the above account shows that it was a general of the Chola king who conducted his campaign.  But it is somewhat difficult to believe how a single Chola army could overrun within one year such a vast tract of country.  It is also said that after vanquishing the kings of the Gangetic countries Rajendra-Chola’s general caused the water of the sacred river to be brought to the Chola capital on the heads of the conquered kings[22].   A stone record of the king found at Ennayiram in the South Arcot district contains interesting information regarding the conquest of the northern region by the king himself, of his stately return march with all the splendour of the conqueror, of his wedding the Ganga and hence assuming the title Gangaikonda-Chola and building a hall called after the title at Ennayiram and feeding a number of people in it.  The wording of the inscription seems to indicate that Rajendra-Chola I was himself engaged in the expedition against the kings of Northern India (Uttarapatha) and if may not be unreasonable to suppose that he did not entrust the management of it merely to his generals as the wording of the Tiruvalangadu plates at first sight would imply[23].  Though the date of the record is effaced, the conquests enumerated in it show that it cannot be earlier than A.D. 1023.  It interesting to note that charities which it registers for the maintenance of a hostel and a college for religious instruction of every description, were made to secure success to the arms of the king, showing clearly that the king was at the time engaged in the war.  It must have been during this northern invasion that Rajendra-Chola had the lords of the Kuluta and the Utkala countries slain by his generals as reported in the Kanyakumari inscription[24].  The encounter with the Kuluta king is also referred to in an inscription of the king found at Mahendragiri where he is said to haveset up a pillar of victory.  The Kanyakumar inscription adds Kalinga to the list of the king’s conquests.  After this invasion of northern India there seems to have been considerable communication between the kings of northern India and the Chola country.  During the reign of Rajadhiraja I, the son and successor of Rajendra-Chola I, the title “Protector of the people of Kannakuchchi” (Kanyakubja, i.e., Kanauj) was bestowed on one of the royal princes.  This shows that Kanauj had close relations with the Cholas.  In an inscription of Kulottunga I found at Gangaikondacholapuram, the usual introduction of the inscriptions of Gahadavala king Govindarachandra occurs after the name of the Chola king.  As the prasasti of the gahadavala king was put in after the name of Kulotunga I, it seems as if the Cholas had some sort of suzerainty over that northern power.

In commemoration of this memorable campaign in which the waters of the Ganga were carried on the heads of the subdued kings, the Chola king founded a new city, which he called Gangaikondacholapuram.  In this city, Rajendra-Chola built a great temple on the model of the Rajarajesvara temple at Tanjore, built by his father.  This city was the capital of Chola emperors for about 100 years.  Its original name seems to have been Mudikondacholapuram, after another surname of the king, and afterwards changed into that of Gangaikondacholapuram.  It had also the name Gangapuri.

Great as were the military achievements of Rajendra-Chola I in the mainland of India, he acquired even greater fame by his navel engagements, which took place on the other side of the Bay of Bengal, a feat not attempted by any sovereign of India till his time.  It is said that he dispatched many ships in the midst of the rolling sea, captured Samgramavijajotungavarman, the king of Kadaram, along with his vehicles and accumulated treasure, took Sri-Vishaya, Pannai, Malaiyur, Mayirudingam, Ilangasokam, Mappappalam, Mevilimbangam, Valaippanduru, Takkolam, Madamalingam, Ilamuridesam, Nakkavaram and Kadram.  Samgramavijayottungavarman, the king against whom this war was waged with great advantage of the Cholas was probably a successor fo Maravijayaottungavarman of the Sailendravamsa, the lord of Sri-Vishaya, who while extending the kingdom of Kataha, is reported in the Leyden plates to have built a lofty and beautiful monastery at Nagapattanam and called it Chudamanivarma-vihara, after the name of his father Chudamanivarman.  Since it is stated in the plates that both Rajaraja I and Rajendra-Chola I patronized the vihara, it appears that Samgramavijayaottungavarman, proving refractory, Rajendra-Chola had to take the extreme step of conquering the whole of his kingdom – in which must have been included all the places mentioned above – and depriving him of his wealth.  It is also learnt that Rajendra-Chola (Shih-li-li-cha-yin-lo-lo-chu-lo) sent an embassy to China, though we do not know what his intentions were in that direction[25].

Among the places mentioned in the final campaign of the king, Sri-Vishaya or Sri-Vijaya has been taken to be the same as San-fo-tsai of the Chinese annals and identified by Mr. George Coedes with the residency of Palambang in Sumatra ; Nakkavaram and Pappalam stand respectively for the Nicobar islands and a port of that name in Burma ; Takkolam has been identified with Takopa on the western part of the Malay Peninsula and Kadaram is located in lower Burma.  Rest of the places are not known.

We shall here notice a few facts concerning the relations of Rajendra-Chola I.  Kundavai, the eldest sister of his father married a chief named Vallavaraiyar Vandyadevar, who figures as a feudatory in some of the inscriptions of Rajendra-Chola I.  The king’s sister, the younger Kundavai, was married to the Eastern Chalukya Vimaladitya and this prince was in the Chola dominions for some time, though the object of his mission is not known.  Rajendra-Chola had several queens.  One of them was Panchavanmahadevi ; another was Danti-Pirattiyar[26] and a third Viramahadevi.  Of the last, an inscription of Rajadhiraja states that she entered the supreme feet of Brahma (i.e., died) in the very  year of demise of Rajendra-Chola I and was buried in the very tomb of that king[27]. This tomb in which the bodies of the two royal personages were deposited might possibly have been at Brahmadesam in the North Arcot district.  As the record is dated in the 26th year of the reign of Rajadhiraja, it is inferred that, Rajendra-Chola died in that year, i.e., A.D. 1044 and that his queen Viramahadevi committed sati and was buried with him[28].  The Kanyakumari inscription settles the relationship of Rajendra-Chola I and his successors Rajadhiraja, Rajendradeva and Vira-Rajendra.  It states that like unto the three fires of a sacrifice there were born to Rajendra-Chola I three sons of whom the first was Rajadhiraja and that Rajendradeva and Vira-Rajaendra were his younger brothers[29].  Ammanga was the name of his daughter who married the Eastern Chalukya king Rajaraja I : their son was Kulottunga I.

King Rajendra-Chola I struck coins in his own name.  They are referred to in his inscriptions under the names Rajendrasolan-kasu and Madurantakadevan-Madai.  Besides these, Rajarajan-kasu issued in the time of Rajaraja I was also current in his time[30].

Of the literary activity displayed in the Chola country during the period of rajendra Chola’s rule, we know very little.  Saiva works of the type of Siddhantasaravali must have been largely written and patronized by the king who was himself a devout Saiva.  Jaina and Buddhist literature also had its share of royal patronage.  From the Upasakajanalankara of the Mahathera Ananda, a manuscript of which has been reviewed by Dr. Barnett in the Journal of the Royal Asiactic Society  for January 1901, pp. 87 to 90, it may be inferred that the king lent his patronage to Buddhist literature.  Dr. Barnett thought that the Chola-Ganga mentioned in the Upasakajanalankara was identical with Anantavarman Chodaganga.  This could not be, for, in the first place, the latter is not a Chola but an Eastern Ganga king who ruled at Kalinganagara which has been identified with Mukhalingam in the Parlakimedi estate, Ganjam district.  Pandubhumandala is stated to be the country where Chola-Ganga was ruling as a samanta (a subordinate ruler) perhaps as the viceroy of his father.  This fact makes the chances of his identity with Anantavarman Chodaganga very problematical.  Consequently, a different identification has to be sought for.  The king mentioned is in my opinion the famous Chola emperor Rajendra-Chola I who was also called Gangaikonda-Chola on account of his having subdued the country about Gangai, i.e., the Ganges.  His conquests, as we know, were many and spread practically over the whole of India and extended even to Ceylon.  The Tiruvalangadu grant clearly states that Rajendra-Chola I, also called Madhurantaka, took possession of the wealth of the Pandya king, placed there his own son Chola-Pandy for the protection of the Pandya country, and that he constructed in his capital the tank called Cholagangam evidently so named after one of his own titles.  This last fact decisively proves the identity of the king mentioned in the Upasakajanalankara with king Rajendra-Chola I.  The name Gunakara-Perumpalli which the king is stated to have given to one of the three viharas which he founded in Ceylon also clearly indicates that the builder was a Tamil king.

Rajendra-Chola I succeeded to the throne in A.D. 1012 and ruled till at least A.D. 1044.  His position as a samanta in the Pandya country must have been during the early years of his heir-apparently prior to A.D. 1012.  The identification of Cholaganga with Rajendra-Chola will thus alter the dates and the identification of the Mahathera Ananda, the author of Upasakajanalankara.

In addition to the surnames Gangaikonda-Chola, Mudigonda-Chola and Cholaganga, which have been noticed above, Rajendra-Chola also had the surnames Madurantaka, Nigarili-Chola and Pandita-Chola.  The last name shows that he must have been considered a scholar in Sanskrit.  It is also stated in the Siddhantasaravali of Trilochanasivacharya that Rajendra-Chola on the occasion of his visit to the Ganges saw there the best of the Saivas and brought them with him and settled them at Kanchi and other places in the Chola country.  Information about Rajadhiraja and his successors could be gathered from the elaborate introductions to their inscriptions given by Prof. Hultzsch in parts I. II and III.

[1]  Below pp. 246 ff.

[2]  This title suggests that Sundara-Chola’s actual predecessor or elected predecessor must have been a Parakesarivarman, and Uttama-Chola, the son of Gandaraditya, bore this surname but may have been too young at the time to succeed his father.

[3]  Ep. Ind., Vol. XII, pp. 121 ff.

[4]  This is a Sanskritized form of the Tamil word Valavan which is synonymous with the word Chola.

[5]  J.R.A.S., 1913, pp. 517.

[6]  Ep. Ind., Vol. XV, pp. 44 to 72.

[7]  Another queen mentioned in inscriptions was Parantakandevi-Ammanar, the daughter of a Chera king.

[8]  The adoption of the title Rajakesarivarman could be explained by saying that the claims of Gandaraditya’s chosen successor, viz., his son Parakesarivarman Uttama-Chola were temporarily set aside and postponed.

[9]  No. 122, dated in the 14th year of Rajakesarivarman has been attributed to Sundara-Chola Parantaka II, but may more probably belong to the reign of Rajaraja.

[10]  See below, p. 420 V. 68.

[11]  Loc. Cit., V. 69.

[12]  Ep. Ind., Vol. IX, p. 217.

[13] Madras Epigraphical Report for 1912, p. 23.

[14]  Ep. Ind., Vol. IX, p. 230.

[15]  Dr. Fleet’s Kanarese Dynasties, p. 438.

[16]  The title ‘Nur-madi’ “the hundred times (powerful)” implies not that he was the hundredth powerful king in that family but that he was the most powerful.

[17]  Madras Epigraphical Report  for 1913, para 24.

[18]  Ep. Ind., Vol. XI, pp. 292 ff.

[19]  Ep. Ind., Vol. 3 IX, p. 230.

[20]  Memoirs of the Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal, Vol. LXI., p. 7 f.

[21]  Below, p. 424, Vv. 109 and 110.

[22]  Archaeological Survey Report for 1911-12, p. 176.

[23]  Madras Epigraphical Report for 1918, paragraph 25.

[24]  Travancore Archaelogical Series, Vol. III, p. 157.

[25]  Historical Sketches of Ancient Deccan, p. 257.

[26]  Madras Epigraphical Report for 1912-13, p. 98.

[27]  No. 260 of the Madras Epigraphical Collection for 1915.

[28]  Annual Report on Epigraphy for 1916, paragraph 14.

[29]  Travancore Archaeological Series, Vol. III, p. 120.

[30]  Annual Report on Epigraphy for 1913, paragraph 23.

Home Page