INSCRIPTIONS
COLLECTED DURING THE YEAR 1906-07
INTRODUCTION
PANdyas
16.
The most noteworthy feature of the year was the examination of the
contents of the contents of the Velvikkudi grant and the Madras Museum
Plates of Nedunjadaiyan Parantaka with those of the Sinnamanur Plates
Plates of Rajasimha II, and the construction of a genealogy
and connected account of the Early Pandya kings of Madurai who
flourished between the 7th and 10th centuries A.D.
some stone inscriptions of Baragana-Maharaja and kings known only by
their surnames Maran sadaiyan or Sandaiyamaran which were copied during
the year also belong to about the same period. All these inscriptions
have been published elsewhere (S.I.I. Vol. XIV) and are referred to here
only by way of information.
17.
The next king after Rajasimha II, and probably his successor, was
Virapandya who claims to have taken the head of the Chola. This
adversary has been surmised to be no other than the great Parantaka I
himself, whose death was avenged later by his descendant prince Aditya
II Karikala about A.D. 966 (Ep.Ind.,
Vol. XXV, No.6). The period that followed the demise of Vira-pandya
was one of Chola Suzerainty over the Panday Kingdom, and it is known
that for at least 50 years from A.D. 1020, it was being governed by
Chola viceroys under the title Chola-pandya. Though under subjection the
pandya seem to have continued to rule over parts of their territory, and
the period is marked by constant and prolonged warfare either against
their Chola overlords or among the rival Pandya prince themselves, as
can be gathered from disconnected scraps of information found in Chola
records. With the beginning of the 12th century A.D. the
Cholas seem to have gradually lost their hold on the Pandyas, and we
find inscriptions of Jatavarma
srivallabha, a younger contemporary of Kulottunga-chola I, whose
date of accession has been fixed between A.D. 1120 and 1122, and whose
rule seems to have been confined to a small tract comprising portions of
Madurai, Ramnad and Tirunelveli district. (S.I.I., Vol. XIV, Intr. P.
VI). To this king may perhaps be ascribed No. 507 of the yearâs
collection from Madirai .
18.
Then came the war of Pandya succession in the 3rd quarter of
the century, in which the choals and the Ceylonese king took opposite
sides supporting the claims of rival prince to the throne, and which
continued for a number of years. Prof. K. A. N. Sastri in his Pandyam
Kingdom, thus sums up the final pahse of this war: whatever happened to
Vira-pandya and his relatives, it seems clear that Kullotunga (III)
succeeded in establishing Vikrama-pandya on the Pandya throne and thus
putting an end to all disputes about the succession in which the Cholas
and the Ceylon Kings had taken sides for over a decade. But it is not
yet possible to ascribe any inscriptions with confidence to this
Vikrama-pandya, and we cannot say if he was the immediate predecessor or
not of Jatavaraman Kulasekhara who came to the throne of the Pandyas in
A.D. 1190.
There
are two inscriptions in the yearâs collection which can be definitely
assigned to this king. Nos.90 and 97 (A) from Kallidaikkurichchi in the
Tirunelveli district are both dated in the 7+4th year of
Maravarmaa Vikrama-pandya beginning with the introduction
Tirumagal Jayamagal ect. One of
these register a sale of some land by the assembly of
Rajaraja-chaturvedimangalam to the temple of
Nilaiyudaiya-pandya-Isvarmudaiyar at Kallidaikkurichchi and the other,
the sale of another piece of land to the temple of
Nalayira-Isvaramudauyar in the same place. The taxes on these lands were
remitted in the 9+4th year of Jatavarma kulasekhara as
recorded in Nos. 91and 97 on the representation made by his minister
Kalingarayar, thus showing the very close proximity in time of these two
kings. This seems to receive support from an epigraph of Kulasekhara
from Tirunelveli (No. 83 of 1927) which refers to Vikramapandyadeva as Periya-nayanar.
The same epithet is given to king Srivallbha in No.110 of the 2nd
year Kulasekhara. But the way in which the reference is worded
in the inscription seems to point to a much anterior time, and
probably to the relationship of Srivallabha as father both to Maravarman
Vikramapandya and Jatavaraman Kulasekhara I, the latter being the
younger brother of the former.
19.
This Jatavarman
Kulasekhara who came to
power by A.D. 1190 is represented by a dozen inscriptions which begin
with one of the three introductions Pudalamadandai, Pudala-vanitai
or Puvinkilatti, ect., and range between the 2nd and
25th years of his reign (No.99) the earliest of these is No.
110 already quoted above which records the confirmation of the grant of
a land made by the Nagarattar of
Kshatriyasikhamanipuram in Mulli-nadu to the Nalayira-Vinnagar
temple at Kallidaikkurichchi, agreeing to pay the kadamai on the
land themselves as they had been doing in the time of periyar-nayar
Srivallabhadevar. In No. 152 of the kingâs 3rd year copied
at Melaikkoyil ( Pudukkottai state), a chieftain of the region by name
Kalvayil ânadalvan is stated to have remitted the taxes kadamaarivi
and antarayam on a devadana village. Another important
person of the reign was one Sivallavan Tirunilakantan alias Tondaiman
of Pandimandalam who figures in three records from Sinnamanur (Nos. 445,
450 and 451). In No. 112 from Kallidaikkurichchi the king is mentioned
as being seated on his throne Munaiyadaraiyan in his palace at
Madurai while making a grant to the Vishnu temple at the village.
20.
Of Maravarman Sundara-pandya (acc.A.D.1216) there are 16
inscriptions from his 5th year (No. 100) to his 23rd
(No.124). All of them except Nos. 124, 416 and 436 begin with only a
short formula giving him the attributes âwho took the Chola
countryâ, âwho presented the Chola countryâ, or âwho having
taken the Chola country celebrated the anointment of heroes at
Mudigondasolapuram.â These three inscriptions commence with the long
historical introduction Pumaruviya
Tirumadandaiyam ect., containing an account of all his military
achievements culminating in his virabhisheka in the chola capital. No.
416 dated in his 17+1+1st year mentions an officer of the
king by name Alagapperumal Duvarapativelan.
In No. 124 which is his latest record, mentions is made of his throne Malavarayan
at Madurai and of his two minister Malavarayar and solan
Uyyaninraduvan Kurukulattaraiyan
of Tadanganni Sirrur.
21.
Jatavarama sundara-pandya I (acc. A.D. 1251) was the most
powerful of the Pandya kings, with his sway extending over the whole of
south India as north as Nellore and in the south, even outside to
Ceylon, and with his secondary capital at Kanchipuram. There is only a
single inscription of his this yearsâ collection (No.613) which comes
from Nandalur in the Cuddapah district. It beings with the Sanskrit
introduction samasta-jagad-adhara etc. It is damaged and seems to
register the gift of the village Mananur by the king to the Vishnu
temple at Nirandanur .
22.
Sundara-pandyaâs close
relation and subordinate was Jatavarman Vira-pandya whose date of accession has been fixed at A.D. 1253. His rule
covers almost the same period as sundaraâs and he lays claim to
several expeditions similar to these of his senior. In No. 131 from
Kodumbalur (Pudukkottai state) dated in his 17th year, which
is however damaged, we can read his claims for the conquest of Konganam
and Gangai-nadu and his âanointment of heroes â at puliyar (
Chidambaram ). It records the sale of some lands to the local temple by
the Kaikolas in lieu of the money due from them. Three different kinds
of coins are mentioned in this inscription viz., Pon
or kalanju, Soliyan-kasu and vira-pandyan-kasu. Two
other epigraph may also be ascribed to him. No. 421 from Kambam (Madurai
dt.) dated in his 10th year and No. 402 from Perungarunai in
the Ramanathapuram district of his 14th year both mention his
conquest of Ilam. Kongu and solamandalam and his coronation at
Tillaimanagar.
23.
We are not quite so certain of the identity of Jatavarman
Vira-pandya whose inscriptions from Sinnamanur and
Kallidaikkurichchi (Nos.430 and 117) are respectively dated in the 26th
and 28th years of his reign, but do not begin with any
preamble giving his exploits. The former refers to a hall in the temple
built by an officer of the king and called the vangai-Mikaman-Mandapam
after the surname of one Pillai Kulasekhara-Mahabali-Vanarayar. No.
117 registers an endowment for a feeding house made by a certain
Tirunilakantan Rajakkanayanar alias Tondaimanar of Puduvur in
Ala-nadu.
24.
Of Maravarman Kulasekhara I (acc. A.D. 1268) âwho was pleased
to take all countries â there are a dozen inscription the latest of
which dated in his 41st regnal year ( No.431). It is possible
that three more inscriptions (Nos.125, 127 and128) are also his, though
they do not give him the above attribute. The village Pappangulam (Tirunelveli
dt). from where these records come, is called
Seranaivera-Tirumadaivilagam probably in commemoration of the kingâs
campaign over the Chera country. No.
136 from Kodumbalur dated in his 42nd year may also belong to
one Devan Tirunelveli-Udaiyan, who undertook to reclaim them from a
state of wild growth into which they had fallen by neglect , following a
breach in the local irrigation tank. The lessee is stated to have also
paid 100 panam to the temple as parivatta-mudal, perhaps for some temple honours shown to
him during his visits of worship.
25.
Seven inscriptions from Nandalur (Cuddapah district .) of which Nos.588,
590, 592 and 594 give details of date can be referred to the reign of Jatavarman
sundara-pandya II (acc. A.D.1276 ), and range between his 9th
and 17th regnal years (Nos.614 and 594 ). He is surmised to
have been a co-ruler of Maravarman Kulasekhara I (An. Rept. for
1908, Part II, Para 47) and also a contemporary of Maravarm
Vikarama-Pandya of accession date A.D. 1283, to whom No. 313 from
Tiruvidaimarudur (Tanjavur district) should also be ascribed. Nos. 591-3
and 614 record endowment made by one Pillai Pallavarayar alias Eduttakaiyalagiyar
of Tunjalur in Pandi-mandalam. Another donor was Sirumalikilan of
Jayangondasola-mandalam (Nos.588 and 594).
|
>
|
VIJAYANAGARA
KINGS
26.
The earliest inscription of the Vijayanagara kings is No. 156 from
Mallangudi (Pudukottai State), which belongs to Viruppana (Virupaksha
I), the son of Harihara II. It
is dated in the cyclic year Pingala corresponding to Saka 1299 or A. D.
1377. It is much damaged
and seems to state that the village Malaiyalangudi was the place of
refuge (asrayam) for the Tandirimar of Kalvasal-nadu, Kana-nadu
and other places.
27.
Next in point of time is No. 501 from Vijayanagara (Hampi) which also
gives only the cyclic year Isvara which corresponds to Saka 1319. It records the gift of a dipamala by Bukkayave, the
consort (Ardhaniga-Lakshmir) of Vira Harihararaya (II)
for the merit of her spiritual teacher Bhaskaradevayya.
28.
Two inscriptions, one from Peraiyur in Pudukkottai State (No. 158) and
the other from Tirumalai in N. Arcot district (No. 69) are of Devaraya
II and are dated respectively in Saka 1343 and 1367. The later record gives him the attribute âwho witnessed the
elephant-huntâ and mentions an agent of the king by name
Tipparaisar-Nayaka.
29.
No. 67 which is also from Tirumalai is dated in Saka 1373 and refers
itself to the reign of Pratap Immadideva-Maharaya âwho
witnessed the elephant-huntâ. He is probably the same as Mallikarjuna
Immadi Praudhadeva, son of Devaraya II.
30
Of Krishnadevaraya there are 5 records ranging from Saka 1436 to 1451.
Of these No. 53 from Putalapattu registers an undertaking given
by several merchants of the place to pay magamdi impost on all their
articles of merchandise at specified rates to the local temple. In No. 493 from Kuttalam dated in Saka 1440 the king is given the
title Oddiyandala-vibatan. It
records the remission of 90 pon accruing to him by way of taxes like
jodi and sulavari from Merkaviri-maganai, made through Karanikam
Vasavarasar for the requirements of the temple. No 355 form Tiruvisalur is a damaged
copy of a same inscription of his found in several temples of the
south, remitting the jodi and sulavari amounting to 10,000 varahan in
favour of these enumerated in them, of which that at Tituvasalur was
also one.
31.
Of Krikhanadevarayaâs successor Achytu
deva there are 7
inscription ranging from saka 1454 to 1462. Of these, No. 408 from
Hanumantagudi of date saka 1455 consists of there disconnected pieces
recording the grant of Padikaval right to an individual and
mentioning Arhaparamesvara Maluva-Nayaka. No.271 from Tiruvisalur dated
saka 1456 makes mention of a gift of land and house site to the temple
(?) by one Ramappa-Nayaka as subhakshaya-sadanam for the merit of
his father Vasavananayakar of Tiruvannamalai Devamandala-sirmai. The
king is given, in No.400 from Kodumalur in the Ramantapuram district,
some high-sounding titles like Telunga-Narapati-Purandaran,
Dakshinasamudradhipati, Gajaturaga naradhisvaran, Parapaksha bhujanga
Virapratapa Immadi Achyutadeva-Maharayar. The inscription registers a
gift of the village Melaikkodumalur, half as tiruvidaiyattam and half as
devadana, for the requirements of worship of god Setumadhava-Perumal at
Dhanushkodi. No.151gives him the epithet âwho took every countryâ.
No.64 dated saka 1462 seems to record a gift of magamai (duty on
goods?) for worship in the Siva and Vishnu temples at Tenepalli (Chittoor
district).
32.
Sadasivaraya is the
last king to be represented in the collection. He has four inscriptions
dated between saka 1467 and saka1490 (Nos.55 and 63). No.148 gives him
the epithet âwho took every countryâ and mentions Aiyan
Tyagana-Nayakar Peddappa-Nayakar as a donor, while No. 54 dated saka
1471 refers to mahamandalesvara Ramaraja Chinna-Timmayadeva
and his agent Dalavay Timmarajayyan. To
the same Timmayadeva (Tirimala I) belongs No. 510 from Madurai. It is
dated in saka 1468 and is engraved on 15 detached stones found in the
Madanagopala temple at the place. As some stones are lost and some are
damaged it is difficult to piece the fragments together to from a
continuous inscription. It gives a long list of names of the Aravidu
dynasty beginning from Vishnu, down to Tirumala through several chief.
It registers an endowments of a hundred villages to Brahmanas both
Vaishnava and others and apportionment of shares of land for their
living. Provision seems to have also been made for worship in the Vishnu
and Siva temples.
Continuation
Home
Page
|
>
|
|