|
South
Indian Inscriptions |
|
|
INTRODUCTION
No. 422 referring to Nanurruvan Malayaman
alias Rajendrasolach-chediyarayan and dated in the 15th year
of the king states that his daughter Alavandal and wife of Malaiyaman
Raman Surriyan alias Rajendrasola Malaiyakularayan of Kiliyur, caused
the image of the goddess of Palliyarai to be set up in the temple of
Tiruppulippagavadevar of Sirringur in Kurukkaikkurram in Miladu in
Rajaraja-valanadu, for the merit of her mother (achchi) Udaiyan
Suriyadevi alias Ninratavanjeydal. This lady is referred to as the wife
of Nanurruvan Malaiyaman alias Rajendrasolach-chedirayan in a record of
his predecessor discussed above (No. 409). It records that Alavandal
purchased two veli of lands in Sirringur, from
Vikkiramasolach-chediyarayan son of Rajavirarajendrasolach-chediyarayan,
and granted it as iraiyili-devadana to the same deity for worship and
offerings.
The next king represented in the volume is
Kulottunga II (No. 374) from Olakkur in South Arcot District. It
records a gift of 100 kalanju of gold entrusted to the ur for the
construction to a stone temple to god Tiruvagattisvaram-udaiya-mahadevar
of Ulakkaiyur alias Rajamahendranallur in Oyma-nadu alias
Vijayarajendra-valanadu in Jayangondasola-mandalam, by Rajendradevar.
The urar received it and raised the stone structure (tirukkarrali) upto
the level of the panchanga expending 50 kalanju of gold for its work.
The balance of 50 kalanju was otherwise spent in course of time (kala
virodattal-antarappattapinbu) and because of this the construction work
came to a standstill; the artisans (kalum pidarun-seyvargal) and the
srimahesvaras represented to the ur to take up the construction work but
they could not do so. This is on account of the reason, that funds were
being utilised for the above work. A gift of 20 kalanju was made for
the setting up of an image of god Umaskanda in the temple in lieu of the
gold that was spent. It is not impossible that Rajendra was a chief and
not a king, for the record does not refer to a grant made in the reign
period of Rajendra. It is difficult to take it as a title of Kulottunga
I and consequently as a grant made in his reign period. The expression
panchanga indicates the five out of the six component parts of a vimana,
viz., adhishthana, bhitti, prastara, griva and sikkara. The last part,
i.e., stupi seems to have been left unfinished.
One of the two records of Tribh Rajaraja
from pon-Amaravati in Tiruchirappalli district, dated in the 8th
year (No. 4) records the provision made for the installation of the
linga and for the consecration of the vimana at Ponnamaravati in
Puramalai-nadu in Rajendrasola-valanadu in Rajaraja-Pandinadu by
Rajendrasolan-keralan alias Nishadharajan. The other record of his 19th
year (No.9) states that vimana Rajendrasolan-cholisvaram-udaiya-mahadeva
and records the assignment of right of worship to the Sivabrahmanas the
same temple. In the inscriptions of Kulottunga, the same deity is
referred to. This king has been identified with Kulottunga, the same
deity is referred to. This king has been identified with Kulottunga III
who succeeded Rajaraja II for the temple itself is stated to have been
built during the reign period of Rajaraja. It may therefore be noted
that the chief Rajendrasola Kerala Nishadharajan and Vimana
Rajendrasola-Nishadharajan are identical. Similarly the identification
of Rajaraja suggested in the report reasonable (A. R. Ep., 1909, part.
II, para 51 (6), p. 100). Since during the 12th century A.D.
the fight of steps (sopana) and the cloister around central shrine (tirunadaiumaligai)
were added by a chief named Nilaimaiyalagian, the vimana should have
come into existence in the time of Rajaraja II and not in Rajaraja IIIâs
reign. It is therefore, that this may neither be the rebuilding of the
temple nor the reconsecration of the image. (Cf. Ins. of Padu. State
part. I, p. 110)
No. 432 dated in the 19th (?)
year of Rajaraja II registers an endowment of 4 veli of land in Marudur
alias Abharanadaninallur in Rajarajavalanadu, by Malaiyaman Attimallan
Sokkapperumal alias Rajagambhirach-chediyarayan of Killiyur in
Tirumunaippadi in the same valanadu, for the god Tiruppulippagavadvar of
Sirringur in Kurukkai-kurram in Malanadu, probably so called after the
title Rajagambhira borne by this king Rajaraja II).
The record from Olakkur (No. 373) of the 4th
year of king Rajadhiraja II is of social interest as it enlightens us
with the practice of observing prayachchitta by one who aims at an
individual wrongly for the object of hunt. It states that when Appan
Sattan of Kudippalli Nediyam in Eyilinedungala-nadu in
Vijaya-Rajendra-valanadu in Jayangondasola-mandalam and a certain
Udaiyan Perumal belonging to Orali of Uratti in Uratti-nadu in
Venkunra-kottam, went out for hunting, the arrow aimed by Udaiyan
Perumal at a pulvay (bird) fell on Appan Sattan and killed him. The
pattappaerumakkal, the periyanattar, and the pannattar met and decided
to impose prayachchitta on Udaiyan Perumal, who made a gift of 32 cows
for a perpetual lamp, in order to atone for the killing of Appan Sattan,
to god Vatapivitankar in the temple of Tiruvagattisvaram-udaiyar at
Ulakkaur alias Rajendranallur in Jayangonda-sola-mandalam.
Another Malaiyaman chief Kannan Suran
alias Akarasura Malaiyaman is stated in a record of the same king, dated
in his 19th year, to have endowed a bronze vessel weighing 60
palam, for food-offerings to god Tiruppulippagavadevar (No. 448). His
identity with the Malaiyaman chiefs who bore the title Akarasuran like
Alakiyanayan Tiruvannamalai-perumal etc., is not known except for the
fact that he belongs to the same family. The regnal year quoted in the
record seems to be a mistake for 14.
The only Chola inscription (No. 434) that
refers to the Kadava chief, who claims to belong to Kudal, identified
with the modern Cuddalore (Kudalur) in South Arcot district, is from
Siddhalingamadam of the same district. It is dated in the 6th
year of Virarajendracholadeva, a title of Kulottunga III and in this
record a donor named Elisaimohan alias Jananatha-Kachchiyarayan, son of
Alappirandan Arasanarayanan of Kudalur is mentioned thus indicating his
subordination to this Chola king. This chief is said to have granted
the remission of taxes (specified) for worship, offerings etc., to the
god Urbagankondaruliya-nayanar at Iraiyanaraiyur alias
Solakerala-chaturvedimangalam in Paranur-kurram, a sub-division of
Maladu alias Jananatha-valanadu. The record to doubt belongs to
Kulottunga III whose inscriptions commence with the Prasasti Puyal
vayttu valam perugaâ etc. and the title Rajakesari is a mistake for
Parakesari, frequently occurring in the records later to Vikramachola.
The only difference found in these two records in that is the former,
the title Alappirandan assumed by the chief Arasanarayanan, father of
Elisaimohan is mentioned. That this was an epithet also borne by the
younger Perunjinga is evident from his records. (S.I.I., Vol. XII,
Introd., p. XI). In both the records Elisaimohan calls himself
Jananatha Kachchiyarayan and this should therefore be taken as his
surname as suggested by V. Venkatasubba Ayyar. He is also simply called
Kachchiyarajan in a record from Vriddhachalam in South Arcot district (A.R.
Ep., 1934-35,
No. 99). The name Arasanarayanan Elisaimohan consisting
of two names clearly reveals that they represent the names of the father
and the son. It has to be noted that the chief Elisaimohan is
definitely referred to in the record under review as the son of
Arasanarayanan, who assumed title Alappirandan. (Also see S.I.I., Vol.,
XII, p. 170).
In the Siddhalingamadam inscriptions (Nos.
435 and 436) of Virarajendradeva identified with Kulottunga III as
mentioned above and dated in the same year, one of the Malaiyaman
chiefs, Sokkapperumal is stated to have assumed the epithets
Ponparappinan and Rajagambhirachchediyarayan. The vassalage of a chief
of this family named Attimallan Sokkapperumal who has a similar biruda
Rajagambhirachchediyarayan (No. 432) to the Chola king Rajaraja II had
been noticed above.
From the name Attimallan Sokkapperumal,
one may have to infer that Sokkapperumal was the son of Attimallan on
the analogy of the names of the Kadava chief Arasanarayanan Elisaimoham.
It is not impossible to identify Sokkapperumal of the present
inscription with the chief of the same name under Rajaraja II and
suggest that he continued to server under Kulottunga III from the same
place i.e., Kiliyur. As the interval between the last years of Rajaraja
II and the 6th year of Kulottunga III is not a long period
for the service of this chief, we have necessarily to presume the
existence of one and the same chief. By referring to the title
Ponparappina borne by a servant named Kuttan Panaiyan in a record of the
same king and date (No. 436) it would gives us a clue to identify the
chief of this record calling himself Rajagambhirach-chediyarayan with
Sokkapperumal who had both the epithets. Such a title as Ponparappinan
assumed by this servant (kanmi) after his master reveals his devoted
service to the master, who might have honored him by bestowing a title.
Kolottunga III was served by another Malaiyaman chief of Kiliyur viz.,
Malaiyaman Suriyan Nirerran Edirigalnayan alias Rajaraja
Malaiyakularayan (No. 421).
No. 286 from Tirukkachchur, Chingleput
taluk and district which is dated in the 10th year of
Kulottunga III mentions a certain Panchanadi-vanan alias Irasarasa
Nilagangaraiyan Devan as a donor to god Tiruvalakkoyil-nayanar of
Tirukkachchur. This chief is probably identical with panchanadivanan
alias Rajaraja-Nilagangaraiyan mentioned in a record of the same king,
three years later, from the same place (No. 290). This inscription
furnishes-his name Kulottungasolakkannappan-Adinayan and his native
village Tiruchchuram in Kulottungasola-valanadu in puliyur-kottan in
Jayangonsasola-mandalam. In a record from Tirumalisai (A.R. Ep., 1911,
part II, para 29) a certain pillaiyar Kulottungasola Kannappan
Nallanayan is also stated to be a resident of Tiruchchuram. This
Nilagangaraiyan chief bears the title Pachanadivanan and the prefix
pillaiyar (i.e. prince). The record referring to him is 3 years later
than the record under review which does not mention any such prefix and
therefore they are two different chiefs of the family.
No. 730, from Tirunedungalam, Lalgudi
Taluk, Tiruchchirappalli District dated in the 4th year of
Rajarajadeva is an interesting record which states that a certain
Aludaiyapillaiyaradiyan Idaragalaivan alias Anapayamuttaraiyan son of
Vilambikkudaiyan Tillai Tirunattapperumal alias Visaiyalaya Muttaraiyar
of Vilambikudi in Pandikulasani-valanadu set up a linga called
Ulaganadisvaram Udaiyar in the first prakara of the temple of
Tirunedungalam Udaiyar, for the merit of the latter (the donorâs father)
and perission was obtained by the donor from Tribhuvanaviradeva
described as Periyadevar. Tribhuvanaviradeva, as we know from a number
of records of Kulottungachola, was a title assumed by him in the latter
part of his reign. He is also referred to as Periyadevar in the records
of his successor Rajaraja III (A.R. Ep., 1912, part II, para 30). It is
evident from this, that Periyadevar (see Ep., Ind., Vol XXXIV, p.159)
must be taken in indicate a predecessor who is respected by his
successor in his records (i.e., Rajaraja III). It is further stated
that Tribhuvanaviradeva granted in Lalgudi permission while he was
staying in the Rajaraja-manadapa at Urrattur, which is the same as
Uttattur, Lalgudi taluk of the same district.
Only one record of Rajendrachola III is
found in this yearâs collection. This record from Konerirajapuram (No.
688) dated in his 11th regnal year refers to a certain lady
named Kuttadu-Nachchiyar, the wife of a chief Sri Vanakovaraiyar of
Karaikkadu, whose identity is not known. She is different from a queen
of the same name mentioned in No. 522 of 1902 (S.I.I., Vol., VIII, No.
112) from Tiruvannamalai. The attribute Tribhuvanachakravartti borne by
him clearly indicates that he is a later king i.e. Rajendra III.
Pandyas.âNo. 525 from Solapuram, Sivaganga
Taluk, Ramanathapuram District is a record of the 13th year
of Konerimeikondan. The identification of this king is rather
interesting. It registers the re-grant of a group of villages, on the
request of sabhai of Uttamasolach-chaturvedi-mangalam, devadana of
Uttamasolavinnagar-alvar of Solapuram, originally endowed during the
time of the elder grandfather (Periya-appattar) and subsequently in the
time of younger grandfather (ilaiya-appattar) of the king and enjoyed in
the name of Sundarapandyach-chaturvedimangalam. It is further stated
that the sabhai requested the grandson named Uttamasolaperiyar to rename
these villages as Uttamasolach-chaturvedi-mangalam and gave it to twenty
individuals, for worship, etc., after reclamation of the same, to
Uttamasola-vinnagar-alvar.
In a record from the same place but dated
in the 4th year of Jatavarman Srivallabha, one Sundara-Pandya
is described as pillaiyar and mentioned to have granted lands to the
temple, while he was camping at Arukai-Kuntrattur in Anma-nadu, on the
request of the sabhai of Sundarapandya-chaturvedi-mangalam. This prince
Sundara-pandya has been identified as the son of Srivallabha. (S.I.I.,
Vol. XIV, No. 205 and Introd. P. vii) and the village was so called
after this name. Since the name of the original grant village mentioned
in the record under review is the same, whose sabhai is said to have
represented to the prince Sundara-pandya in the 4th year of
Srivallabha, the grant should have been made earlier to this date. It
may also be inferred from the present inscription, that Sundarapandya
was the ilaiyaappattan who was again the son of Jatavarman Srivallabha
as stated above. Here neither the name of the periya-appattar nor of
his son is known. Uttamacholapperiyar, was the grandson (peran) probably
of periyan-appattar and it was after him the deity and the village were
renamed respectively as Uttamasola-virragar-alvar and
Uttamasola-chaturvedimangalam. Konerimelkondan who issued order to this
effect may be identified with Uttamasolapperiyar. (Cf.A.R. Ep., 1910,
part II, ara 32).
There are two records of Jatavarman
Kulashekara with high rebnal years. The record from Pon-Amaravati is
dated in the 23rd year of the king (No. 10). One of the three
kings of this name with the introduction puvin-kilatti has a reign
period of 28 years. It is not therefore unlikely that the king of the
present record is Jatavarman Kulashekara I whose accession has been
taken to be, 1190 A.D. In this inscription, Tirukkodunkunram-uadaiyan
Keralan alias Nishadharajan is stated to be the donor of the village
Velkur alias Malayadhvajach-chaturvedimangalam in Purumalai-nadu along
with income from several taxes for various offering to the goddess
Tirukkamakotta-nachchiyar alias Aludaiya-nachchiyar of the temple of
Rajendrasolisvaram-udaiyanayanar at Ponnamarapati in the same nadu.
This chief is probably identical with the
donor occurring in inscriptions Nos, 3, 4 and 5 who seem to have assumed
the titles Rajendrasolan and Alagiyadevan. He is called the lord of
Tirukkodunkuram which is identified with the modern Piranmalai in the
Pudukotti District (Cf Inscription. of pudu state, part. I, p. 134 and
p. 221). This, and the fact that it carries a high regnal year, support
the possibility of the king being identified with Jatavaram kulashekara
I (accn. 1190 A.D.)
|
>
|
One of the records of Maravarman
Sunarapanya I found in the temple of Cholesvara at Pon-Amaraviati,
Tirumayam Taluk, Tirchchirapalli District is dated in the 11+1st year
(=1127-28 A.D.) It refers to the title Marachchakravarti-pillai
conferred on Tiruvarankulam-udaiyar by the group of people called
Maramanikkar of Ponnamarapati inn Puramalai-nadu for his reciting the
Per-vanji and records the grant of tax-free lands for the purpose of
reciting verses in praise of the rerumal (god) of this place. It may be
inferred from the title borne by this chief that he must have belonged
to the same group the Per-vanji which may be the same as Peru-vani is a
theme describing the setting fire to an anemy's country as referred to
in a Tamil grammatical work called Puraporrul âvenba-malai. Another
record (No.18) of this king is dated in the year 13+1 (=1229-30 A.D.) It
records a royal grant of the villages sevur and Munjaikkudi described as
Vallakurruva-koduvatkani in Puramalainadu, as tax-free (iraiyili)
devadana for the nambimar of the temple and for the daily offering to
god. Alagapperumai-vinnagar-alvar of ponna marapati in the same nadu. It
is not unlikely that this temple might have been named probably after
its builder Alagapperumal, who was a brother of the queen Maravarman
Sundarapandya I. (A.R.Ep., 1973-74, No. 152 and Introduction, p. 18).
In a record (No. 718) of Jata
Sundarapandya I dated in his 8th year from Tirunedungalam,
Lalgudi taluk, Tiruchirapalli District, it is stated that a sale of land
by a certain Thirukkattuppalli-udaiuan Seliyagangan of Kiliyur in
Kiliyur-nadu in Vadakarai-nadu. It also refers to a Periyamudali alias
Kangayar, the younger brother of Seliyanganan as the owner of this sold
land. Two years later in another record of this king, Perrandan alias
Seliyagangan, one of the residents of Kiliyur is said to have attested a
sale document (No. 722). It is not unlikely that this Perrandan is the
same as Periyamudali alias Kangayar of the former record, who is
mentioned as the younger brother of Triukkattupalli-udaiuan Seliyagangan
of Kiliyur. The expressions andan and mudalai denoted one and the same
meaning viz., âthe chief âor the âlordâ.
An interesting inscription (No. 333)
from Tirukkachchur, Chingleput Taluk and District dated in the 13th
year of Jatavarman Sundarapandya refers to an instance of social justice
shown by pillai (prince) Pottappiyarayar by apprehending the criminals
of Uttippakkam. (A.R. Ep., 1913, part, II para 34). The details of
date Kumbha, su. 5., Wednesday, Asvati-in his thirteenth regnal year may
be equated with 1263 A>D., February 14, the nakshatra ended at 0.98 on
the previous day. The name of this officer Enadi Merkudaiyan Periyanayan
is mentioned in an undated record from Tiruvorriyur Saidapet Tlauk,
Chingleput District. He is stated to be the donor of a door way (tiruvasal)
called Ellantalaiyanaperumal caused to be made probably in the temple of
Tiruvorriyur-mahadeva where the record is found engraved on a pillar of
the shrine of the goddess, for the merit of Perumal Sundarapandyadeva.
The epithet Ellantalaiyanaperumal, after which the door-way was named is
said to have been borne by Jata Sundarapandya I. (A. R. Ep., 1913, part
II, para 44) Hence, the chief Pottappiya-rayar who is no doubt identical
with the donor of the latter record must have served under Jatavarman
Sundarapandya I. (A. R. Ep., 1910, part II, para 34).
No. 431 from Siddhalirigamadam dated in
the 6th year of Maravarman Vikramapandyadeva refers to the
institution of a service called Pulavartalaivan-sandhi by the
nagarattars of Sirringur in the Kurukkai-kurram in Maladu in
Rajaraja-valanadu in the temple of Tiruppulippagava-nayanar of the place
and place and records a grant of 1000 kuli of land here for the same
service by the nagarattars who received it from the king as Perumal-kani,
It is not Know whether this king had a title Pulavar-talaivar similar to
Rajakkal-nayan, a distinguishing epithet of his (A. R> Ep., 1922, part
31 and 35).
Alaganperumal Ativiraraman is mentioned in
about eight inscriptions from Solapuram in Ramanathapuram District and
Tenkasi in Tirunelveli District. He is described as the son (nandar) of
Dharmapperumal Kulasekharadeva in the 13th year of the latter
king (No.511). The expression namkumaran occurring in a record of
Perumal Ativiraraman alias Sivaladeva dated Saka 1509 and in his 26th
year may be taken to indicate his position as a crown-prince (No. 511).
The former record gives the details of date viz., Saka 1483, 13th
year, Durmati, Varsha-ritu, Kunnai 19, su.10, Thursday, Uttiradam
corresponding to 1561 A.D., September 18 which must be the date of his
appointment as a crown-prince. There is another record in Tamil dated
Saka 1486, Raktakshi, Chittirai 20, su. 6, Sunday, Punarpusam equivalent
to 1564 A.D., April 16 in which he is stated to have been crowned. (See
A.R.Ep., part II, para 38).
In an inscription (no. 562) of Perumal
Kulasekharadevar-Parakrama-Pandyadeva, son of Jatilavarman Trib
Konerinmaikondan Perumal Abhirama Parakrama Pandyadeva, from Tenkasi,
dated Saka 1473, year 8, Virodhikrit, Karnataka 15, su. 12, Tuesday,
Mula corresponding to 1551A.D., July 14, the farmerâs son
Tirunelvelipperumal is stated to have assumed the title ViravenbamalaiI.
Another record (No. 557) from this place but dated twelve years later
refer to the king Perumal Tirunelvelipperumal Dharmaperumal
Kulasekharadeva, son of Abhirama parakrama, with a similar epithet
mentioned above. From this it may be said that the title was borne both
by the father and the son.
An inscription from Tenkasi, Tenkasi Taluk
refers to Nelvli Maran Viravel Kulasekharachcheliyan also called Ponnin
Pandyan who was crowned at Kasi in the presence of the god on saka 1474,
Paridhavi, Chittirai 29, ba. Monday, Rohini, Mithuna-lagnam (-1552 A.D.,
April 25) and to the composition of Viravenbamalai by a poet to mark
this occasion (No. 538). It may be noted that in the inscriptions from
the same place Tirunelveliperumal Kulasekjardeva, son of Abhirama
Parakrama Pandyadeva is credited with the title Viravenbamalai (A. R. Ep.,
1917, No. 513). This record which furnishes the same details of date as
the one referring to Kulasekharachcheliyan (No. 538) also mentions his
second regnal year. In the light of this inscription, it has been
surmised that Abhirama Parakramaâs son who was born in Asvati (A. R. Ep.,
1918, part II, paras 60-63) i.e., Tirunelvelipperumal alias Vira
Venbamalai alias Dharmapperumal Kulasekhara ascended the throne in Saka
1474 (Ibid.). If the second year is taken as Saka 1474, then it would
yield the date of his accession to the throne as Saka 1473.
Since our record (No. 538) states that on
Monday the 29th day of the second paksha in the month of
Chittirai when the constellation was Rohini he was coroneted, it is not
unlikely that the regnal year mentioned in the other record (A. R. Ep.,
1917, No. 513) is a mistake.
No.542 from Tenkasi dated in Kali 4689
states that Vel viramaran alias Abiraman was crowned in this year. This
date corresponds to 1588 A. D. It records that a certain Kasikkaliyan,
a poet (kavirayan) composed a verse describing his valour. Also a
similar verse-record in Tamil from the same place (No. 546) in praise of
King Virapandyan Abiraman described his conquest of Villavan and capture
of Vallam, He is styled herein as Viramaran Seliyan This king may be
identified with Vel Viramaran Abiraman.
<More>
Home
Page
|
>
|
| |