|
Kashmir and Neighbors |
Punjab,
Bengal and the Tamils The Srilankan Tamils | Punjab-Plenty and Panic| The Naxalites Although separated from the pear-shaped island of Sri Lanka by a strip of narrow sea, India is affected by the Tamils of neighboring Sri Lanka.[1] The British planters, unable convert the Sinhalese subsistence farmer into a wage-labourer, chose to draw on the vast reservoir of manpower in what is now Tamil Nadu. Thus, the British planted, not only tea and coffee, but also the seeds of antagonism between the Sinhalese farmer and the Tamil worker, both dark-skinned labourers. The Tamil had come to the Jaffna Penisula and much of the east coast since the 2nd century A.D. While the Sinhalese already entertained concerns over Tamil dominance, the two Tamil groups could not stand together in the way the Sinhalese believe that they do. The LTTE, or the terrorist organization of some Tamil groups already involved in a kind of a civil war with the Sri Lanakan Army, executed a number of savage acts, the most dramatic being the former India Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination (1991). For the question of sorting out the rights of minorities, the Tamils in particular, prevailed and dominated Sri Lankan politics. The basic conflict was between the majority Sinhalese (13.4 million, 74%) and the minority Tamils. Almost every Sri Lankan government, starting with that of the first Prime Minister, Stephen Senanayake, strove to harmonize the interests of the main ethnic groups. While the majority Sinhalese, originally from Bengal, are mainly (90%) Buddhist, and speak Sinhala,[2] the tamils are predominantly Hindu and have their own tongue. [3]Two groups constitute the latter, however, one known as “Sri Lankan” (Ceylon or Jaffna) Tamils (2.2 m., 12%) and the other “Up Country (Indian or Estate) Tamils (1.1 m., 6%).[4] The first category constitutes of the descendants of immigrants who came centuries ago from south India. The second category is made up of the sons and daughters of Tamils brought by the British in the last century or the beginning of the 1900s to work on the tea and rubber plantations. Most of the Up Country Tamils were stateless when the country became independent, and many of them were the most disadvantaged among the population. According to an agreement (1964) between Sri Lanka and India, 975,000 Tamils were to be repatriated,[5] and the rest would be given Sri Lankan citizenship. |
The
LTTE, among the several extremist groups formed after the new Sri Lankan
Republican Constitution that did away with some protective articles of
the minorities, started to entertain the idea of a separate state for
the Tamils. The Up Country Tamils came under the attack of the militant
Sinhalese as secession became dominant with the minority groups who
sought refuge in the safer north-eastern areas. While not all Indian
Tamils became militants, the government project (1981) offering some
autonomy to the Tamils, in spite of opposition from the Sinhalese
hardliners, was too little and too late. No
Indian government could overlook the ethnic strife between the majority
and the minority in SriLanka. It came increasingly under pressure to
intervene for the SriLankan Tamils. An Indian-Sri Lankan Agreement
(1987)[6]
provided for a largely autonomous provincial council and an equal status
between Tamil, Sinhala and English. An Indian Peace-Keeping Force (IPKF),
some 3,000 Indian troops, were sent to the north-eastern part of the
island. While the LTTE renounced the agreement, the Indian troops were
increased twenty-five fold. There was no improvement of the situation
when the Indian troops withdrew in early 1990. The well-intentioned
agreement satisfied neither the Sinhalese, nor the Tamils and resulted
in the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi for sending the Indian troops to
Sri Lanka. The
IPKF was at first assigned the thorny duty of interposing between the
Sri Lankan army and the LTTE and shouldering the difficult burden of
removing the mines and booby traps in the Jaffna region.
The Indian troops could not achieve these objectives. They failed
to end the intervention within a reasonably short time as some
decision-makers initially envisaged, and the military involvement led to
loss of Indian lives and money. Dragged more and more into an overseas
ethnic conflict, the Indian soldiers turned into a party taking direct
action against the LTTE militants, whose exploits may only be termed as
illegal in impartial opinion as well as in the judgement of the Sri
Lankan authorities. During the 967 days of its stay, intended to be
peace-keeping, the Indian army’s losses reached 1,155 deaths by the
time the V.P. Singh government withdrew the forces. While a new build-up
of the LTTE in Tamil Nadu has been underway in recent years, this
militant organization seems committed to terrorist acts in India. It is
regrettable that an aggressive group seeks to make south India a
hinterland of convert activities related to ethnic violence in neighboring
state.
|
|
[1] E. Nissan, Sri Lanka: a Bitter Harvest, London, Minority Rights Group (MRG), 1996; W. Schwarz, The Tamila of Sri Lanka, London, Tamil Information Centre, 1987 W.R. de A. Samarasinghe and Vidyamali Samarasinghe, Historical Dictionary of Sri Lanka, Lanham, Md. And London, The Scarecrow Press, 1998, [2] K.N.O. Dharmadasa,
“Language and Sinhalese Nationalism”, Modern Ceylon Studies,
III/2(1972), [3] K.N.O. Dharmadasa, “Language Conflict in Sri Lanka”, Sri Lanka Journal of the Social Scienes, IV/2 (December 1981), [4] M.D. Raghavan, Tamil Culture in Ceylon, Colombo, Kalai Nilyan Ltd., 1972. Also: A.S. Abraham, “Indian Tamils of Sri Lanks”, The Other India: the Overseas Indians and their Relationship with India, ed., I.J. Bahadur Singh, New Delhi, India International Centre,1979, [5] M. Vamadevan, Sri Lanka Repatriates in Tamil Nadu: Rehabilitation and Integration, Madras, Zen Publishers, 1989. [6] H.L. De Silva, “The Indo –Sri Lanka Agreement (1987) in the Perspective of Inter-State Relations”, Ethnic Studies Report, Kandy, Sri Lanka, X/2 (July 1992),
|
|