The Indian Analyst

 

Kashmir and Neighbors

 
 

Preface

I started taking notes for this book after observing Indian soldiers in Srinagar, Kashmir’s summer capital, gazing through the gun-slits of their sand-bagged bunkers. They were trying to coexist with the state’s natural beauty, its greatest resource. The panorama from Hotel Welcome, where I stayed, was a glimpse of so much more to delight in. But the bunkers draped in camouflage netting and dotting street corners were also contrasting sights of more to come.

A multi-religious political entity based on Kashmiriyat, a common culture shared by the country’s Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, and even Buddhists, gave way to a bloody wedge between various groups of these communities. Insurgencies, kept up by foreign entities, attracted mercenaries who apparently needed a job and a mission. Attacks on Hindus, most of whom were Brahmins belonging to the Pandit caste, and Muslims, both of whom lived, by and large, as bhai-bhai (like brothers) for generations, not only relocated virtually the entire Hindu population of the Valley (equally called Vale) of Kashmir, but also made in sufficiently supportive Muslims targets. This dangerous episode presented itself in constitutionally secular India whose founding father, Jawaharlal Nehru, was a Kashmiri Pandit himself and where Sufi (mystical) Islam as an unidiomatic faith with components from sources outside Muslim teaching, moved closer to Hinduism.

Although Article 370 of the Constitution of India recognizes the special position of the State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), the latter is a part of India. Hence, the word “neighbours” in the title of the book refers mainly to Pakistan and the export of mercenaries from another neighbor Afghanistan. J&K faces a dilemma. After the grassroots violence, that emerged in 1988, and with Pakistan throwing its lot in with it, terrorism discouraged tourism, on which the state’s economy substantially depended, and economic stagnation pushed the unemployed youth towards guerilla activity that pays dividends in more ways than one. The armed rebels are now motivated less by Kashmiri nationalism than “fundamentalism”, partially sponsored by neighboring Pakistani groups and Afghanistan’s Taliban and other imported aliens, most of whom are strangers to that land and its peoples. Some called them depressingly, during the summer of 1999, the forces of India and Pakistan, both now possessing a nuclear capability, clashed at Kargil, giving chills to all those fear the future may be decided by an atomic contest. India may be acclaimed favorably for self-restraint after rebuffing Pakistan’s incursion.

Blood-soaked episodes compel me to probe the Kashmir issue, especially in the light of terrorism, not unmindful of the role played by the infamous Taliban-at-arms. Hoping for the triumph of eventual stability in J&K, this book finds it worthwhile, by way of comparison, to offer a description of the fascinating land, manifold people, far-reaching past, and the nation-building experiences of India and Pakistan, which seemingly march to different drummers. Since no issue can be addressed in isolation, the chapters below serve. In my opinion, the main purpose of this  research, which is terrorism in J&K as it is the instrument of the foreign policy of the two north-western neighbors of India. There can be no understanding of the issue without some essential background of these closely interrelated factors. The present militants carried out violent actions, partly but consequentially assisted by the Pakistani intelligence services. The Afghan experience was momentous for this neighboring country for providing it with an infrastructure of trained manpower, camps and weapons as much as a centre of indoctrination of Mujahideen (fighters) for Islamic jehad (literally “struggle”, holy war or ardent effort to spread Islam). This book’s sections on violence in the “Seven Sisters” of India’s northeast and in Punjab aim to evince the parallelism between all extremist activities in different parts of India.

There is no security either for India and Pakistan, both nuclear states now, or for the whole of the Sub-continent, without peace and stability in J&K. While the road to truce and reconciliation passes through bilateral talks and mutual accommodation, realistic and far-reaching enough to deserve the support of the Kashmiris, the success of the Central Government in New Delhi in regaining the loyalty of the Sikhs of  Punjab raises hopes that the alienation in the Valley of Kashmir may well be a nightmare of the past. Just as Pakistan’s long-enduring vision that the Kashmiris wish to join their Islamic neighbor lacks sufficiently convincing basis, India needs to pursue policies of more human rights and more jobs, in addition to the need to crush terrorism.

I hope that I have been able to offer more than mere Khali batchit (empty chatter).

A note on spelling: Some units of language such as names, frequently seen in printed works, may be spelled differently in each case. Among the most repeatedly used words are the Qur’an (Koran), Muhammad (Mohammed), Moghul (Mughal), Abdullah (Abdalla), and the like. For Example, a very prominent Muslim thinker (Sir Syed Ahmad Khan) spelled an oft-repeated word even in the titles of his own books in different ways: Mahomedan, Mohomedan. The controversy stems  from the fact that the original term is not an English one, thereby rendered into the Latin script in different ways by various writers. I employ the most frequent or the most likely correct form, if not the choice of the original source itself.

Turkkaya Ataov

New York-New Delhi-Srinagar-Ankara

 

Home Page