|
Kashmir and Neighbors |
Nation-BuildingPakistan- Political Pandemonium | Nation-Building | India-Problems of Pluralism | India-Social and Economic Transformation | Pakistan-Search for Economic Stability Pakistan faced almost insurmountable problems since its very inception. It is often repeated that the new Government of Pakistan began to function in “hastily improvised shacks, without records, without furniture, and even without paper or pencils”.[1] The resources of the young country, which lacked an administrative core, were scanty. Karachi, then a little bit more than a fishermen’s town, had to house the capital of the new nation, divided into two sections, East Pakistan comprising about one-seventh of the area but four-sevenths of the population while West Pakistan, separated from the former by a distance of close to 1,600 km., embracing six-sevenths of the area on which only three-sevenths of the population lived. Bengal in the east and Punjab in the west, the most populous provinces, were themselves partitioned, the former having lost its chief port Calcutta, and the latter deprived of the water headwork's. Not only the entrepreneurial Hindus and Sikhs migrated en masse, but also the country, which yet lacked capital and technical know how, had to cope with millions of Muslim refugees from India. Presently, nearly all of Pakistan’s 1.5 million Hindus reside in the province of Sindh’s southeastern district of Thar Parkar, the Hindus account for a little over one third of the local population.[2] A few Hindu banjas (mainly traders or trading communities) are to be found in Karachi. Almost 5% Pakistan’s population are now non-Muslims, the Christians being the largest single group (over 1.5%). Apart from the Hindus and the Ahmadis (1.4-3.2%), a sprinkling of Jews, Sikhs and Parsis form the rest. The Christians, who stayed behind after partion, live in the country’s largest province, Punjab. Most of them working as agricultural and construction workers, some of their churches in Pakistan were destroyed after the Babri Masjid affair in India.[3] Fierce riots against the Ahmadis, who get their name from the founder of their sect, do not believe in the finality of the Prophet hood of Muhammad.[4] In 1974, Pakistan’s Parliament excluded from the fold of Islam all those who do not believe in the absolute and unqualified highest “Finality of the Prophet hood of Muhammad”.[5] Under Pakistan’s Constitution, the highest administrative posts (of President, Prime Minister, Commander of the Armed Forces, and provincial governors) are reserved for Muslims alone. The laws of witness (Qanoon-e shahadat) consider the evidence of the non-Muslims (and women of all religions) of less value than that of the Muslim males. |
Most
of Pakistan’s political life was replete with civil disobedience
movements, processions, strike calls, accusations of rigged elections,
bans on political activity, “taming of parties”, dismissals of
cabinets, reinforcements of martial law censorship, detentions, house
arrests, murder of opponents, executions, farcical referendums,
electoral frauds, boycott of elections, and the pursuit of bringing the
country into conformity with the shari’a law. In
the space of a year, Pakistan had to face some hard facts, such as
providing for close to ten million refugees, fighting a war in Kashmir,
and trying to go forth without the father of the country. Its very
continuance was “something of a miracle”.[6]
Jinnah, the nations’s charismatic leader and the first Governor
General, died only a little over a year after independence, and the
tenure of the able Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan (a Mohajir) was
cut short by assassination three years later. After their departure
there was a vacuum in the Pakistan polity. During the first decade
(1947-58), Pakistan had one commander-in-chief but seven prime
ministers.[7]
No nationwide elections on the basis of universal adult suffrage were
held in the first twenty-three years of its existence. Several
governments established their legitimacy, but none could maintain it for
more than a brief period. Until the year 2000, it had twenty-one
executive heads of government, the majority of whom were dismissed from
office. By the time the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution (Article
58/b/2), which gave absolute power to the president to dismiss any
elected government, was repealed (1997) by Nawaz Sharif, in his second
term as well, could not escape the same fate even after his massive
mandate and show of strength for the repeal. Political
instability followed almost until the world reached the threshold of the
next century. Pakistan had four constitutions within a quarter of a
century, initially creating five provinces, later reduced to two, but
rearranged as five again following the secession of the eastern wing.
The basic governmental structure oscillated between parliamentary and
presidential practices as well as between unicameral and bicameral
systems. The parliament was closed down several times, accompanied by
frequent martial laws and dictators.[8] There were three wars with
India, and a civil war with the Muslim Bengalis. Despite unity during
the Pakistan movement (1940-47), “the nascent state could not come to
terms with the problems of ethno-nationalism”.[9]
Constitution-making was uncommonly delayed. The first Constituent
Assembly, outliving its five-year term, failed to produce a
constitution, and the second Constituent Assembly’s Constitution of
1956 was abrogated (1958) by Governor General Iskandar Mirza, who had
just taken the oath of defending it. The 1962 Constitution was likewise
shelved by the Sandhurst-trained General Ayub Khan. Only the military
defeat that caused the secession of East Bengal discredited the
dictorship of General Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan opening the way to the
democratic Constitution of 1973. Pakistan’s identity crisis, even
after the secession of East Bengal, has been severe. The continuous
search for national integration is clearly related to the crisis of
identity. While
the first Constituent Assembly amalgamated the four provinces of West
Pakistan into a single unit, Yahya Khan revived the old federative
pattern, and replaced Ayup Khan’s presidential system and indirect
elections with a parliamentary form of government and direct elections
with seats reserved for provinces on a population basis. The Awami
League, led by Mujibur Rahman, having secured nearly all the seats from
East Bengal, proved strong enough to form an absolute majority in the
central legislature in the first ever general elections of late 1970.[10]
The opposition of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s “socialist-leaning” PPP[11]
to this idea led to arrests, border clashes, war and the emergence of
independent Bangladesh.[12]
The late 1960s witnessed the birth of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference
(OIC), and the beginning of the 1970s saw the sudden outburst
in crude oil prices. When Bhutto assumed office, the manpower-starvd
oil-rich countries found a ready source of supply of Muslim workers from
Pakistan, the militarily-weak sheikhdoms found sufficiently-trained
armed forces, and Colonel M. -al Gaddafi as well as King Faisal thought
that Pakistan could build nuclear capability with some financial
assistance. The year 1971 was a fateful year for Pakistan. The military
government unleashed its well-equipped army, eventually defeated lock,
stock and barrel, on the armed forces and the people of East Bengal,
causing the death of about three million inhabitants and the migration
of about ten million more. [13]
The new Constitution (1973), democratic in outlook, declared Islam as
the religion of the state, for the first time. The Qur’an and the
teachings of Islamiyat became compulsory for the Muslim citizens, and
bringing the existing laws in conformity with the injunctions of the
Qur’an and the Sunnah as Inslamic duty. The learning of Arabic was
encouraged while the Islamic Council and an Advisory Council of Islamic
Idelogy were constituted. Pakistan hosted the second Islamic Summit
Conference (Lahore, 1974), which established an international Islamic
Bank, a proposal submitted by Pakistan. Friday instead of Sunday became
the weekly holiday, and the consumption of alcohol and gambing as well
as night shows and horse racing were banned. The hanging of Bhutto, the
“Quaid-e Awam” (or the Popular Leader) as he styled himself, removed
from power by a military coup (5 July 1977)), was an event unparalleled
in the modern history of the Sub-continent. |
|
While General Muhammad Zia-ul Haq’s administration publicized the belief that his Nizam-e Mustafa plan of action was different from the Islamization programmes of the previous governments,[14] some commentators seemed convinced that his Islamic legal reforms have had only a minor impact on the corpus of Pakistan’s legal system.[15] The thin veneer of westernization, characteristic of the Pakistani elite, wore out, and with the new generations dominating political discourse, the ‘nativization’ of the country’s politics necessarily involved more Islamization.[16] Ayub was a ‘brown Englishman’, and Zia appeared to be more rooted in his native culture. [17] Perhaps the first measure underZiz toward Islamization was the introduction of separate electorates as the basis of the future elections, expecting voters belonging to different religious persuasions to exercise their franchise only for their own candidates. Soon, Khatt-e Imam (Khomeini line of thinking) got the upper hand. Eventually, directives were issued to government departments for namaz, (prayers) during office hours, to be led by departmental heads. All business centers were obliged to close for Friday prayers. A committee was set to revive the Islamic institutions of Zakat (poor tax) and ushr (agricultural tax).[18] In addition to present coursts, shar’a benches were created, whose decisions could not be challenged in any other court.[19] Hudud punishments were introduced for drinking, theft, dacoity, and adultery. [20] Zia discouraged co-education but encouraged chadar (closed garments) for women. A Shari’a Faculty was established at the Quaid-e Azam University in Islamabad, the Council of Islamic Ideology was empowered to make recommendations as to the measures for bringing existing laws into conformity with the Qur’an and the Sunnah (the sacred tradition in rule or custom), and the Islamic Research Institute was entrusted with the task of conducting research in Islam.[21] Steps were taken to revise textbooks and curricula. The poor flocked to the madrasas (religious schools) which gave them food and shelter. The television and radio were ordered to redesign their programmes according to the Islamic teachings. With the echo of the Iranian outcry of Musalman-e Pakbaz the unwanted Muslims were eliminated, and persons known for their strong commitment to an Islamic order were appointed to key government positions. Zia promulgated (15 June 1988) an Ordinance, which made the Shari’a the supreme law of the land.[22] He exhausted all of his political cards, including Islam, to legitimize his rule. Had he lived, an “extremely hostile opposition” would have confronted him.[23] While some criticized him severely for being antidemocratic, reactionary and discriminatory to women, some Islamapasands found what he did as too little. The mysterious crash that killed him (17 August 1988) perhaps gave hime an “honourable” exit.[24] Genral Zia-ul Haq’s regime had lasted very long (1977-88) without much challenge to its authority, except the launching (1981) of the Movement for the Restoration of Democracy (MRD). Perhaps more time must elapse before his place in the country’s history can be more objectively assessed. He might have moved Pakistan to a prominence desired by some of the earlier leaders, but he is now remembered as the man who illegally seized power, and after more than a decade of repressive rule, left behind unemployment, hunger, discrimination, corruption, drugs, debt and empty Islamic rhetoric.[25] Although the transfer of power to elected representatives put Islamization on a low key, no political party could ignore that concept during the 1988 election. Every leading party had its own “pocket Maulvi” as an ally. Everyone carrying with it an Islamic label, Benazir Bhutto’s PPP had jamiat-ul Ulama-e Islam, and the Muslim League had jamaat-e Islami.[26] One of the first things that Benazir, the long-time exiled leader of the PPP and who wanted to keep her father’s legacy alive, did was to perform umrah (the lesser pilgrimage to Mecca). She naturally upheld (January 1989) the governmental ban an Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses. Her administration did neither dismantle the shari’a courts, nor rescind the hudud ordinances, nor curb the authority of the Council of Islamic Ideology. No government could take backward steps from the Islamization drive. The end result was the birth of various umbrella organizations for the major sects and groups, namely, the Sipahi-e Sahaba for the Sunnis and the Tahrik-e Jaffria for the Shi’a. When a group of ulama had approached Quaid-e Azam asking him to enforce the shari’a, he reportedly replied: “Whose shari’a? Hanafi’s? Hanabali’s? Shafaie’s? Maliki’s?’[27] Pakistan, thus, became a safe haven for many radical Islamic groups in the world, and turned into a violent society. The premises of the madrasas are now centers of jehad to where arms and ammunition flow freely, and private armies settle scores in the name of Islam. Ther
were times when armed clashes occurred between supporters of competing
political forces, and the country seemed to be on the verge of civil
war. Following in the footsteps sof the Taliban, students from the
religious schools in the tribal areas of the frontier go around raiding
houses and burning television sets “to purge the society” of what
they brand as un-Islamic practices.[28]
The Government of Pakistan succumbed to the demands of the Tahrik-e
Nifaz-e Shari’a-e Muhammadi (TNSM) with the enactment of the Shari’a
Nizam-e Adl Regulation (1999) in Malakand. The Chief Minister (Sardar
Mehtab Ahmad Khan) reportedly said: “This is a historic step with
far-reaching significance. The day is not far when inshallah the
people of the ares will achieve the distinction of guiding Pakistan and
the whole Islamic world in the enforcement of the shari’a.”[29] Benazir Bhutto,[30] the daughter of the executed prime minister, twice (1988-90, 1993-96) served as the chief executive and dismissed on both occasions, was frequently accused of corruption and finally found guilty of embezzlement of funds. While Nawaz Sharif was holding supreme executive authority after the mid-term general election in 1997, which some authors defined as a “smooth transfer of power” the country had never witnessed before,[31] and while Pakistan was looking forward to the next National Assembly and presidential elections in 2002, Genral Parwaz (Pervez) Musharraf, Chief of Staff, usurped power (1999) but promised a return to civilian rule-without a fixed date, however.[32] Sharif had returned to power with a mandate big enough to strike down the controversial Article 58/2/b and to refuse to revive the Council for Defence and National Security, thereby depriving the armed forces of direct leverage they had thus far enjoyed, the absence of such mechanisms to change corrupt governments increased the danger of extra-constitutional intervention. Since independence, Pakistan meant Punjab, first and foremost. The Punjabis were in all the key positions, and politicians from that province dominated the country’s polity. Benefiting from the line or reasoning that India never reconciled itself to the idea of partition, the leaders of the armed forces, who are also mostly Punjabis or in accord with them, possess the state. They have accumulated more authority in the absenece of charismatic civilian leaders, whose public images are often blended with corruption as well as failure. They hanged Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who had given Pakistan a sort of legitimate government. Many of them argued that democracy did not suit Pakistan, and engineered one coup d’etat after another. Calling the shots under civilian or military governments, the armed forces formulated the policy towards the neighbours and the great powers. They endorsed the repetition of the Afghan experience in Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan’s social fabric is giving way because of the country’s present connection with the Afghan Mujahideen, whose camps are training grounds for Islamic zealots. In response to the excessive “Punjabization” of Pakistani politics, and also attracted by the Pathan Taliban, the Pushtu people of Pakistan may encourage the formation of “great Afghanistan”. If their interest is channeled towards an independent state for the Pathans, the issue of “great Baluchistan” may also come up, as the Mohajir demand a separate province. The Pushtunistan (Pakhtunistan) movement (NWFP) was dormant[33] while the Sindh and the Baluch movements rose over time. Their rise or fall are related to the domestic and international factors. Even when the new Islamic state was to be formed domestic and international factors. Even when the new Islamic state was to be formed in 1947, the Pushtun, Sindhi and the Baluchi elites pursued the goal of establishing their own autonomous states. Realizing a successful boycott campaign against the special referendum held by the British, the Pathans in the north-west evidently favoured the formation of their own state. The hope of a synthesis between liberal nationalism and the Islamic umma, which had characterized the state ideology of Pakistan at the beginning of partition, broke down, to be restructured under AyubKhan is the form of new one-unit and one-official language entity called West Pakistan, now to adhere to a “Basic Democracy” system[34] and a pro-Western foreign policy. The elite of the non-Punjabi peoples, who could not find their due share even in this new system, interpreted the nation-building efforts of the military-bureaucratic leadership as domestic colonialism. The traditional landed elite in the north-west was left outside political power, the rich agricultural land of Sindh was partially distributed among the Punjab senior officials, and Baluchistan’s natural gas went to the other provinces as well. Not only the Pushtun, Sindhi and the Baluchi elites, but also Ayub Khan himself eventually based his own political autobiography on the trial-and-error belief that the developing countries needed Western friends, not masters.[35] |
|
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto’s policy of “Islamic socialist community”[36] and sharing of power with other ethnic elites, designed to meet the challenge of continuing local grievances, came to an abrubt end. Divergence towards a new non-aligned path in foreign affairs did not help, and the non-Punjabis emphasized their regional nationalism. Sindhi and Baluchi guerilla organizations had already emerged when Bhutto was overthrown by the military. Ethnic alienation persisted while the new administration to the one-unit and one-language and closer relations with the Muslim world. Afraid of Soviet military intervention in Afghanistan, the masses once more clustered around the Islamic axis, further bolstered by the Iranian Revolution. Is spite of such ‘blending’ factors, the non-Punjabi nationalities continued off-and-on to resist the melting pot of the Pakistani state? The North-West Frontier Province may be renamed as “Pakhtunkhwa”. If the Mujahideen ignite a civil war on Pakistan’s soil, the long-standing demand for an independent Pathan state may reopen. The feelings of alienation and separate identity among Mohajirs, those Muslim refugees who fled India at the time of partition and came over to Pakistan to settle in Karachi, Hyderabad and Sukkur, occurred as a result of a number of recent events and led to their mobilization under the banner of the MQM. The original idea of Pakistan did not envisage en masse transfer of population, but as Muslims from minority provinces came “by train loads, on trucks, lorries, bullock-carts and on foot”[37] to become legitimate citizens of the new state, they were given an initial identity of “Panahgeerss”, also meaning refugees as the first symptom of their denial of guaranteed status. These refugees, who had come mostly from the urban areas of India, had already broken from rural way of life and also from the feudal mentality, and were therefore closer to the Sindhi hari or Punjabi mazera (peasant), and not the Baluchi sirdar or the Pathan Khan (landlord). In addition to being more devoted to the Pakistan ideology, the Mojajirs were, at least initially, more advanced educationally compared to the other four ethnic groups in West Pakistan. One of the outstanding refugees of the country was the first Prime Minsiter Liaquat Ali Khan, assassinated in 1951. This dramatic event led many among the refugee community to think that those who came from outside were not accepted as the “real sons and daughters of the soil” even though their children might later be born on that land.[38] The Mohajir-Pathan clashes were the first ethnic riots in Karachi. Gohar Ayub Khan, the son of President Ayub Khan, is believed to have engineered the attacks on the Mohajir community when the latter supported Fatima Jinnah, the sister of the Quaid-e Azam, against the President during the late-1964 elections. The Mohajirs, not only doubted the credibility of the election, but also feared the further erosion of their influence on account of the shift of the federal capital from Karachi to Rawalpindi, Ayub Khan’s birth place. The Mohajirs felt alienated again when the Sindh Assembly, dominated by the sindhi-speaking members of Bhutto’s PPP, passed (1972) a bill accepting Sindhi, along with Urdu, as the provincial language,[39] and also when the regime, which nationalized big business, introduced an urban-rural quota in Sindh arousing Mohairs, always supportive of “Pakistani” nationalism, were forced to seek and define their own identity. The MQM was formed (1984), on the basis of the All-Pakistan Mohajir Student Organization, a few days after General Ziaul Haq extended the rural-urban quota system for another ten years. After Altaf Hussein, the MQM leader, announced that he would unite the Mohajirs under the banner of their own party, gunmen and the police opened fire on several occasions killing members of the MQM or its sympathizers.[40] Some Mohajirs now demand a separate province to be called Jinnahabad or Jinnahpur. [1] Ishtiaq Husain Qureshi, The Struggle for Pakistan, Karachi, University of Karachi, 1979, [2] Yoginder Sikand, “Hapless Minorities of Pakistan”, Secular Democracy, New Delhi, XXIV/5 (August 1995), [3] A Federal Shari’a Court member in Islamabad considers some foreign suspicions that those who do not believe in an idelogical Islamic state may be tramped upon as second rate citizens as unfounded apprehensions. Abdul Ghafur Musllm, “Comment”, Journal, Kent, U.K., Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, 9/2 (July 1988), [4] A descendant of a
Turco-Moghul family from Samarkand, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1836-1908)
founded (1889) the Ahmadi movement (whose adherents are also
sometimes known as Qadianis) and declared himself to be the
“Messiah” to demonstrate the truth of Islam. Orthodox
Muslims were enraged, however, by his challenge of the fundamental
doctrine of Katm-e nabuwwat, which underlines that Muhammad
is the last of all prophets. Some Ahmadis (most notably Sir Muhammad
Zafrullah Khan, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister in the 1950s, and
subsequently a judge of the International Court of Justice) have
achieved prominence. See: Muhammad Zafrullah Khan, Servant of
God, London, Unwin Brothers, 1983. For the teachings of the
Ahmadiyyah Movement: Bashir-udDin Mahmud Ahmad, Invitation to
Ahmadiyyat, Henley, U.K. Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980; Spencer
Lavan, The Ahmadiyyah Movement: Past and Present, Amritsar,
India, Guru Nanak Dev University, 1974. [5] The celebrated Indian Muslim poet Philosopher Sir Muhammad Iqbal had expressed (1934) his views on the “Qadianis and Orthodox Muslims”, which provoked Nehru to write some articles on the same movement in The Modern Review (Calcutta). In reply to Nehru’s articles , Iqbal wrote a detailed rejoinder published under the title target="_self" Islam and Ahmadism (new printing: Lahore, Sh. Muhammad Ashraf, 1980). Underlining that Islam founded itself on the religious idea alone, Iqbal asserted that the Muslims were naturally much more senitive to forces which they considered harmful to their integrity, and therefore, any religious society arising from the bosom of Islam, claiming a new prophet hood for its basis, had to be regarded “as a danger to the solidarity of Islam”. In his words, Islam could not reconcile itself to a movement which threatened its present solidarity and held the promise of further rifts. [6] Wayne Ayres Wilcox, “Nation-Building: the Problem in Pakistan”, World Writers on Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan Publications, 1968, [7] India had one prime minister and seven commanders-in-chief. [8] Ralph Braibanti, “The Research Potential of Pakistan’s Development”, eds., Lawrence Ziring, Ralph Braibanti and W. Howard Wriggings, Pakistan: the Long View, Durham. N.C. Duke University Press 1977, Norman D. Palmer, “Changing Patterns of Politics in Pakistan: an Overview”, ed., Mansooruddin Ahmed, Contemporary Pakistan: Politics, Economy, and society, Karachi, Royal Book Company, 1982, [9] Tahir Amin, Ethno-National Movements of Pakistan: Domestic and International Factors, Islamabad, Institute of Policy Studies, 1988, [10] Muhammad Abdul Wadud Bhuiyan, Emergence of Bangladesh and [the ] Role of [the] Awami League, New Delhi, Vikas, 1982; Rounaq Jahan, Pakistan: Failure in National Integration, New York, Columbia University Press, 1972. [11] Shahed Javid Burki, Pakistan Underr Bhutto: 1971-77,London, Macmillan, 1980. [12] Hasan Askari Rizvi, Internal Strife ad External Intervention” India’s Role in the Civil War in East Pakistan (Bangladesh), Lahore, Progressive Publishers, 1981; Hasan Zaheer, The Separation of East Pakistan: the Rise and the Realization of Bengali Muslim Nationalism, New York, Oxford Univrsity Press, 1994; Zi;folar Ali Vhutto, The Great Tragedy, Karachi, Pakistan People’s Party, 1971. [13] For a chronicle of breathtaking events in the course of nine months: Jahanara Imam, Of Blood and Fire: the Untold Story of Bangladesh’s War of Independence, New Delhi, Sterling Publishers, 1989. A Pakistani journalist’s spine-chilling, eye-witness account of large-scale massacre perpetrated by the militarists on the people of East Bengal: Anthony Mascarenhas, The Rape of Bangla Desh, Delhi,Vikas Publications, 1971. [14] Tanzil-ur Rahman, Islamization in Pakistan, Islamabad, Council of Islamic Ideology 1984. [15] Charless H. Kennedy, “Islamization and Legal Reform in Pakistan: 1979-1989”, Pacific Affairs, Vancouver, 63/1 (Spring 1990), [16] Anwar H.Syed, “The
Pakistan People’s Party: Phases One and Two”, Pakistan: the
Long View, [17] Richard F. Byrop, “Pakistan”, The Middle East Journal, Washington, D.C., 32/1 (Winter 1978), [18] Islamisation of Hudood Laws in Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan Publications, n.d. [19] Justice Aftab Hussain, Federal
Shariat court in Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan Publications, n.d. [20] Introduction of Banking System in Pakistan, Islamabad, Pakistan Publications, n.d. [21] Islamic University and Institute of Training in Shari’ah and Legal Profession, Islamabad, Pakistan Publications, n.d. [22] For a great many Pakistani writers, General Zia took “concrete steps towards the introduction of Islamic order in Pakistan”. For instance: Masudul hasan, Pakistan: the Call of Islam, Islamabad, Pakistan Publications, n.d. In the eyes of some Muslim commentators, however, even that Shari’a Ordinance is “no more than a vicious device to entrench European hegemony in the spheres of legislation and morality and exclude the Islamic values”. Ibrahim Sulaiman, “Fallacy of Law Reform in Muslim World”, Islamic Order, Karachi, X/2 (Second Quarter 1988), [23] Rasul B. Rais, “Pakistan in 1988: from Command to Conciliation Politics”, Asian Survey Berkeley, XXIX/2 (February 1989), [24] Dawn, Karachi, 18 August 1988. A book of tribute to him: Shaheed-ul-Islam Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, London, Indus Thames Publishers for the Islamic Council, 1990. [25] Shahid Javed Burki, “Pakistan Under Zia: 1977-88”, Asian Survey, Nerkeley, XXVIII/10 (October 1988), [26] S.S. Bindra, “Imperatives of Islamization in Pakistan”, New Quest, Bombay, 76 (July-August 1989), [27] “Pakistani Movement: was it Communal or National Based in the Region”, The News, 17 April 1997, quoted in Sreedhar and Nilesh Bhagat, Pakistan: a Withering State? Delhi, Wordsmiths, 1999, [28] Behroz Khan, “Frontier Taliban”, Newsline, Karachi, 10/8 (February 1999), [29] Ismail Khan, “The
Ploitics of Shariah”, ibid., [30] Benazir Bhutto, Daughter of the East: an Autobiography, London, Hamish Hamilton, 1988. Written with a political purpose, much of the book is an account of Z.A Bhutto’s trail, his execution and the daughter’s detention. |
|
[31] For instance: Z.A., “Making History?” The Herald, Karachi, October 1999, [32] In an address to the nation on 17 October 1999, General Musharraf gave a crumbling economy, lost credibility, demolished state institutions, provincial disharmony and “brothers… at each other’s throat” as reasons for the military take-over (Government of Pakistan, Address to the Nation by…General Pervez Musharraf, Islamabad, Ministry of Information and Media Development, 1999). Some third parties see a connection between Ossama bin Laden, the “guest” of the Taliban in Afghanistan, and the fundamentalist groups operating in Pakistan and consider the military coup as reinforcing that bond (for instance: Mervyn Dymally, “Pakistani Military Coup Reinforces Spreading Threat of Jihad”, San Francisco Chronicle, 25 October 1999). Also: Yuri Tissovski in Vek, Moscow, 41-99 (22 October 1999). Qazi Abdul Wahid, a prominent fundementalist leader, the Jamaat-e islami amir disclosed in Lashkar-e Taiba congregation at Muridke near Lahore (3-5 November 1999) that the Nawaz Sharif government “was about to launch a big crackdown on religious groups… but that he was removed”. The Friday Times, Lahore, 12 November 1999. When Gen. Musharraf expressed that he was impressed by modern Turkey’s secularist M. Kemal Ataturk, Q. H. Ahmad declared that “only as Islamic system could work” in Pakistan. (Dawn, the Internet, 21 October 1999.) Although the new military leader called on the ulama, the religious clergy, expecting them “to come forth and present Islam in its true light”, that is, “tolerance and not hatred, universal brotherhood and not enmity, peace and not violence, progress and not bigotry” (also: Suzanne Goldberg reporting in The.Guardian, 22 October 1999), some others asserted that Musharraf also had “extreme Islamic contacts” (Eshan Ahrari’s analysis in Jane’s Intellignece Review, Surrey, U.K., 15, October 1999). [33] Khalid Bin Sayeed,
“Pathan Regionalism”, The South Atlantic Quarterly, Durham,
N.C., 63(1969), On the “Afghans”
who live on the Pakistan side of the Durand Line: James W. Spain, The
People of the Khyper: the Pathans of Pakistan, New York, Praeger,
1963. By a British officer who spent “ a lifetime among Pathans”:
Olaf Caroe, The Pathans: 550 B.C. –A.D. 1957, London,
Macmillan, 1958. Drawing on historical precedent, some authors
conclude that the peoples on either side of the Hindu Kush have a
common past, and therefore, a common future: Mohammad Haqidar,
“Pak-Afghan Common Destiny”, WUFA, quarterly journal of
the Writers’ Union of Free Afghanistan, Peshawar, 1/3 (1986), On
the Pakhtunistan Movement: Dorothea Seelye Franck,
“Pakhtunistan-Disputed Disposition of a Tribal Land”, The
Middle East Journal, Washington, D.C., 6/1 (1952), [34] Mohammad Ayub Khan, “ A new Experiment in Democracy in Pakistan”, Annals Philadephia, 348 (March 1965), [35] Ayub Khan, Friends Not
Masters, op. cit., passim. [36] Bhutto’s success at the
polls of 1970 was due in large measure to the promise of complete
overhaul of institutions, a Mawashrati Taraqi or
“modernization”, not clearly defined. For his followers, the new
structure ranged from a Westminster-type of parliamentary democracy
to a “dictatorship of the people”. See: Burki, op. cit., [37] Rashit Jamal, Mohajirs
of Pakistan: Plight and Struggle for Survival, Karachi,
Loh-e-Adab Publication, 1998. [38] Turkkaya Ataov, “A Case of Discrimination”, EAFORD Newsletter, Geneva, December 1997,. An essay based on the observations of the author, born and raised in the United Provinces of British India: Afak Haydar, “The Mahajirs in Sindh: a Critical Essay”, ed., J. Henry Korson, Contemporary Problems of Pakistan, Boulder, Westview Press, 1993. [39] Tariq Rahman, “Language and Politics in a Pakistan Province: the Sindhi Language Movement”, Asian Survey, Berkeley, XXXV/11 (November 1995) [40] See MQM Bulletins released from the International Secretariat in London. Also: A petition to Mr. Kofi Annan.. by the …MQM on the Terrifyingly Shocking Killing of Ten MQM members by Government Agencies, London, 16 August 1998.
|
|