The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous

Inscriptions And Translations

Kalachuri Chedi Era

Abhiras

Traikutakas

Early Kalachuris of Mahishmati

Early Gurjaras

Kalachuri of Tripuri

Kalachuri of Sarayupara

Kalachuri of South Kosala

Sendrakas of Gujarat

Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Dynasty of Harischandra

Administration

Religion

Society

Economic Condition

Literature

Coins

Genealogical Tables

Texts And Translations

Incriptions of The Abhiras

Inscriptions of The Maharajas of Valkha

Incriptions of The Mahishmati

Inscriptions of The Traikutakas

Incriptions of The Sangamasimha

Incriptions of The Early Kalcahuris

Incriptions of The Early Gurjaras

Incriptions of The Sendrakas

Incriptions of The Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Incriptions of The Dynasty of The Harischandra

Incriptions of The Kalachuris of Tripuri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INCRIPTIONS OF THE KALACHURIS OF TRIPURI

No. 47;
PLATE XXXVII
MAKUNDPUR STONE INSCRIPTION OF GANGEYADEVA: (KALACHURI) Y
EAR 772

THIS inscription was brought to public notice by General Cunningham’s Assistant Mr. J. D. Beglar who found a rubbing of it in the Asiatic Society’s collection. He called attention to its date1 in connection with the description of the ruins at Makundpur, a village about nine miles south by west of Rewa, in the State of Vindhya Pradesh. He could not, however, find the inscription when he visited the place in 1874-75. The record was next twice referred to by Dr. Kielhorn2 who, drawing attention to its date, pointed out the desirability of examining it. Its impressions were not, however, accessible to him, when he wrote his exhaustive articles on the epoch of the Kalachuri-Chēdi era3, and none has noticed the inscription since then. At my request Dr. N. P. Chakravarti, the Government Epigraphist, kindly visited Makundpur in 1931. He was fortunately successful in tracing the inscribed slab, and supplied me with excellent estampages from which the inscription is edited here.

The record is incised on a slab lying on the ruins of a small temple4 situated to the north-west of Rūpasāgar, a large tank, at Makundpur. The inscribed surface measures 3' 2" in length and nearly 5" in height. The record has suffered considerably at the top, about half a dozen aksharas and the mātrās on the top of some more on the right-hand side of the first line being wholly or partially damaged.

t>

The inscription consists of three lines of which the last two are shorter than the first. The characters belong to the Nāgarī alphabet of the eleventh century A.C. Most of the letters have a wedge or an inverted acute-angled triangle at the top. It is noteworthy that the left limb of ś is not joined to the right-hand vertical; th, though still without a vertical, has, for the first time in the records edited here, a horizontal line at the top, and h has a fully drawn tail. The language is Sanskrit. Attention may be drawn to the incorrect causal participle ghatāpita, 1.3, formed on the model of kārāpita which figures in earlier records, and the wrong gender in dharman=idam, 1. 2. As regards orthography, the sign for v is used to denote b in Vudha-, 1. I, and the dental s substituted for ś in Jalasayana-, 1. 2. The consonant preceding and following r is reduplicated in Sūttradhāra-, 1. 3 and dharma-, 1. 2 respectively.

The inscription refers itself to the reign of Gāngēyadēva of the Later Kalachuri Dynasty. He is mentioned here with the title Mahārha-mahā-mahattaka which is rarely, if ever, seen to be assumed by rulers of the eminence and power of Gāngēyadēva. Owing to the mutilation of the Piawan rock inscription this is now the only known extant record of the reign of Gāngēyadēva. The object of the inscription is to record that the Śrēshthin Dāmōdara, the ornament of the family of Grihapati, caused a temple of Jalaśayana5 (Vishnu reposing on water) to be constructed. The work was executed by the Sūtradhāra Sāmbhūka.

The chief interest of the inscription lies in its date, which is given with full details in line I as Samvat 772, the 12th tithi of the bright fortnight of Kārttika, a Wednesday. Beglar called attention to the fact that from the form of the characters, the date cannot be referred to the Vikrama Samvat. He also suggested that it probably referred to the Chēdi
________________

1C. A. S. I. R., Vol. XIII, p. 5, n. I.
2 Ind. Ant., Vol. XX, P. 85; Ep. Ind., Vol. I, p. 354.
3 Ind. Ant. Vol. XVII, pp. 215 ff. and Festgruss an Roth, pp. 53 ff.
4 This may be ‘the Vaishnavic temple’ which, according to Beglar, supplied materials for a large Śaiva temple nearby. See C. A. S. I. R., Vol. XIII, P. 4.
5 This form of the deity is probably identical with what is commonly called Śeshaśāyin ‘Vishnu sleeping on his couch of the serpent Śēsha’. As the temple was situated near the large tank of Rūpasāgar, it was appropriately dedicated to this form.

CORPUS INCRPTIONS INDICARUM
MAKUNDAPUR STONE OINCRPTION OF NGANGEYADEVA: (KALACHURI ) YEAR 772

images/234

 

  Home Page