North Indian Inscriptions

Contents
Index
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Images
EDITION AND TEXTS
Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti
An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala
Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar
Supplementary-Inscriptions
Index
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE YAJVAPALAS OF NARWAR

No. 170¹

No. 171⁸

No. 172¹⁵

_____________________________
¹ From an impression which is No. 213 of A.R. Ep., 1954-55, Appx. B. The letters are extremely damaged.
^[2] Expressed by a symbol.
^[3] The sign of visarga, if engraved, is smaller in size.
^[4] As in the corresponding portion of the preceding records. Here the person seems to be called a mantrin.
^[5] Read .
^[6] As already noted by Sircar, these are probably the sons of the person who died in fighting.
^[7] Lines 6-8 are damaged and therefore indistinct.
^[8] From an impression which is No. 223 of A. R. Ep., 1954-55, Appx, B.
^[9] Expressed by a symbol followed by two illegible letters which appear as traces of Svasti.
^[10] The number showing the tithi is lost here.
^[11] Read , which is followed by 2 or 3 letters which I cannot make out as they are carelessly formed.
^[12] Sircar observed that the broken letters may have been , and the reading has to be adopted here. They are in the form of traces only.
^[13] See n, on the corresponding portions in Nos. 165, 166 and 174.
^[14] Possibly to be read as . The rest of the inscription, which contains four lines, is illegible.
^[15] From an impression which is No. 218 of A. R. Ep., 1954-55, Appx.
^[16], This portion which is broken, may have contained the year and the name of the month. Also whether the consonant of the following akshara is
dental or palatal cannot be ascertained.
^[17] Possibly to be restored to -.
^[18] The letters are not clear in the impression but lacunas may conjecturally be filled in by .

Page 25 - >>

<< - 23 Page

Home Page