North Indian Inscriptions

Contents
Index
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Images
EDITION AND TEXTS
Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti
An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala
Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar
Supplementary-Inscriptions
Index
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE YAJVAPALAS OF NARWAR

No. 170¹

No. 171⁸

No. 172¹⁵

_____________________________
^[1] The lost letters may have been , as in No. 162.
^[2] Sircar observed that here the portion may have contained tīrē, but to me they appear to be traces of , as taken here.
^[3] Here the name of the father may have been given but it cannot be made out completely.
^[4 That is, Rāüta. Following it is probably the name of the hero and letters appears as , but the reading is uncertain.
^[5] Whether the daṇḍas were followed by some more letters cannot be determined.
^[6] From an impression which is No. 217 of A. R. Ep., 1954-55, Appx. B.
^[7] The first two letters in this line are broken off, and except a letter or two here and there, the whole of the rest is lost. It is, however, included as it belongs to the battle and shows the year 1338.
^[8] From an impression which is No. 215 of A. R. Ep., 1954-55, Appx. B.
^[9] Expressed by a symbol.
^[10] The year agrees with that in Nos. 162, 168-69 and 171 although in Nos. 164, 167, 170 and 173-174 it is given as 1338, for which see Dr. Sircar’s remarks, as already stated above.

Page 26 - >>

<< - 24 Page

Home Page