The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Images

EDITION AND TEXTS

Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti

An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala

Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar

Supplementary-Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE CHANDELLAS OF JEJAKABHUKTI

_________________________
1 The letter in the brackets is perhaps originally ś, later on changed to s, with an unsuccessful attempt.
2 The consonant of the akshara in brackets appears as ch.
3 The kula-parvatas (seven mountain ranges) are well-known. See Mark purāṇa (Bid-Indica series), p. 284.
4 The horizontal stroke distinguishing this letter from ga is not marked.
5 In the latter part of this line a number of the anusvāra-signs have been cut so shallow that they are not distinct in the impressions.
6 This syllable is not properly formed, and the mātrā of ji that follows is mutilated. But the reading is certain. The missing five aksharas at the end of this line may be conjecturally restored to be .dhūli- pratānar-diśaḥ.
7 The stroke partly visible in the end of this line is probably the curve of ka and not the sign of medial ā ; and kt is probably intended.
8 The slanting stroke of this letter distinguishing it from p is not marked.
9 The space for the sign of medial ā is blank in the impressions.
10 The mātrā above this letter is probably placed above the preceding letter.
11 The bracketed letter appears as sa.
12 The original has which Mirashi suggests to be taken as nāṁ ; but to me it appears to have been nō, forming an adjective of marutaḥ.
13 The bracketed akshara looks like tra. Probably chalita may have been intended here.
14 The mātrā of the first ka is partially visible and of the second, it is completely lost. For the idea expressed in this verse cf. Naishadhīya-Charita, Canto VI, v. 27.
15 This verse also appears in No. 60, v. 53, which is a Paramāra grant.
16 Mirashi read these two aksharas as dhamma (rmma), but the first of them has a top-stroke, unlike that of dh and the second has a point, and not a loop as ofm in the left limb. Besides, his reading does not give any sense which may be applicable here.

Home Page

>
>