The Indian Analyst
 

Annual Reports

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

PART I.

Tours of the Superintendent

Collection

Publication

List of villages where inscriptions were copied during the year

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

Appendix D

Appendix E

Appendix F

PART II.

General

Ikhaku kings

Velanandu Chiefs

Kakatiyas

Cholas

Later Pallavas

Pandyas

Hoysalas

Vijayanagara kings

Madura Nayakas

Miscellaneous

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

THE PANDYAS

chaturvēdimaṅgalam are all engraved, one in continuation of another, it is possible that all these documents relating to this agrahāra were engraved in the 2+1st year of Māravarman Kulasekhara.

Parākrama-Pāṇḍya (A.D. 1334); his uncle Kulaśēkhara Mahābali-Vāṇarayar.
   45. Two inscriptions of Parākrama-Pāṇḍya without any distinguishing epithet come from Villiyanūr near Pondicherry (Nos. 187 and 189). No. 189 dated in the 6th year, refers to the institution of a service in the temple of Tirukkāmīśuram- Uḍaiyār at Villiyanallūr, a hamlet of Olugarai alias Kulōttuṅgaśōlanallūr in Māttūr-nāḍu, a subdivision of Jayaṅgoṇḍa-śōla-maṇḍalam, by the king’s ammān (maternal uncle) Kulaśēkhara Mahā- bali-Vāṇarāyar in his own name. The Parākrama-Pāṇḍya of our record is probably to be identified with Māravarman Parākrama-Pāṇḍya, whose initial date, according to No. 113 of 1900, was A.D. 1333-34, since inscriptions of an earlier Jaṭāvarman Parākrama-Pāṇḍya are not found in the South Arcot district. The donor Kulaśē-khara Mahābali-Vāṇarāyan is styled ‘ Piḷḷai ‘ in a record of the 26th year (c. 1322 A.D. ) of Jaṭāvarman Vīra-Pāṇḍya (No. 430 of 1907).

Vira-Pāṇḍya, A.D. 1334.
   46. A damaged record of Kōnērinmaikoṇḍān from Śrīraṅgam (No. 51) refers to the foundation of a colony called Sundarapāṇḍya-chaturvēdimaṅgalam after the name of the king’s elder brother (aṇṇālvi). This record and the subsequent two inscriptions (Nos.52 and 53) which are connected with the present inscrip- tion are signed by Periyān Śōlaimalaichchokkan Toṇḍaimāṇ of Tūñjalūr in Milalai- kūrram, a subdivision of Pāṇḍi-maṇḍalam. The first inscription (No. 51) records a tax-free gift of land by the king to the temple of Vēdanārāyaṇa-Perumāḷ at Tiru- nārāyaṇapuram in Allakarai-nāḍu which is evidently the village of the same name in the Musiri taluk of the Trichinopoly district. A certain Śōlaimalaichchokkan Toṇḍaimān of Aṇikkuḍi in Milalai-kūrram figures as donor in a record of Māra-varman Vīra-Pāṇḍya (No. 27 A of 1903 ; S. I. I., Vol. VIII, No. 300) of the initial year A.D. 1334. If he is the same as the donor in our records we may assign these (Nos. 51, 52 and 53) also to the same Vīra-Pāṇḍya, who, as stated above (No. 51), had an elder brother named Sundara-Pāṇḍya.

 

Home Page

>
>