The Indian Analyst
 

Kashmir and Neighbors

 

 

The Narco-Link  

 How to Combat | The Narco Link

The Government of Pakistan took a series of measures to combat some aspects of this multi-faceted drug problem.[1] A federal Narcotics Control Division sponsored a number of crop substitution development projects, and an Anti-Narcotics Task Force was set up with its headquarters in Islamabad and operational units in Peshwar and Karachi. The amendment of a relevant law provided for destruction of seized narcotics after retaining some samples under court supervision. A Drug Abuse Prevention  Resource Centre actively supports efforts to reduce demands of drugs in the society and carries out a preventive education programme. Some chemicals which have potential use in the conversion of opium into heroin have been placed on a restricted list for the purpose of imports. India and Pakistan signed a bilateral agreement for exchange of information about drug trafficking and smuggling across the border.

However, the control and the ultimate elimination of the narcotics menace constitute a continuous process, and such a serious problem will not be solved in a short period of time. For example, the lands under poppy cultivation are essentially inaccessible areas along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border, and developmental infrastructure to provide alternative means of livelihood to the people is yet to be provided for the satisfaction of all concerned. The government has not been able to stop heroine cultivation. The heroin manufacturing laboratories are also largely located in inaccessible parts of the borders, and they can be easily shifted from one place to another when the authorities launch offensives. Some corrupted officials fail to act decisively against the drug lords. Moreover, since the tribal areas have preserved their autonomy even after partition, the tribal jirga in the NWFP described government action as interference in the “internal affairs” of their region.

Just as in the case of terrorism, the threats emanating from drug trafficking are international in terms of the unbounded sources of narcotics, the assortment of the routes employed, and multi-national cooperation as well as competition among the syndicates. Traffickers show particular tendency to abuse fragile societies, such as many Eastern European countries in the West or Kashmir in Asia, whose security as well as legislative and judiciary systems are rendered vulnerable by intense upheavals. In view of the heinous but excessive profits that the  drug business delivers, the risk of the terrorist groups to seize new opportunities, especially after the disintegration of the Soviet Union, is no longer a matter of fiction. A momentous cost is the inescapable impact of drug trafficking on the quality of administration in terms of security, services and fair deal. All narco-terrorists corrupt various officials in their chain of contacts, undercutting in the process the trustworthiness of governments. Parts of the political body of some countries, the bureaucracy and even groups within the security services are permeated by narcotics-related decay.

The peril assumes an alarming appearance if there exists state sponsorship to narco-terrorists in the form of safe haven, training facilities and support of any kind. Some governments are accused of state sponsorship of terrorism and other crimes emanating from it. India is not the only country that frequently blames its neighbor Pakistan for some of the violence within its borders. For instance, Turkey repeatedly requested Syria, the adjacent state to its south, to close the terrorist bases of the self-styled “Kurdish Workers Party: (PKK), expel its narco-terrorist leader (Abdullah Ocalan), and terminate support for the narcotics industry in the Bekaa Valley of Eastern Lebanon. There are other instances of state sponsorship, some of them unusual and even fantastic. The United States apparently ran a secret war in Laos on opium profits.[2]

Narco-terrorism and money laundering are inter-related. In the process of converting profits collected from criminal activities into licit-looking financial power, the narco-terrorists disrupt the society’s economic system. Since the sums involved exceed the annual gross national products of the majority of countries, colossal volumes of such dimensions possess the capacity of threatening democratic forms of governments, shake weak economies and destabilize global markets. While at times even stolen art objects are traded as part of drug deals, some accumulated capital is channeled into luxurious business, and portions of it pour into expensive weapons, bringing more bloodshed, more drugs, and more power.

No single country can win a war on drugs on its own. There has to be regional and global efforts. In the South Asian context, the SAARC countries should pool their resources by creating a joint anti-narcotics task force to check the flow of illegal produce and extradite traffickers. The task force, made up representatives from all member states, must enjoy the powers to challenge the authority of the big fish. A treaty on extradition of smugglers may also help in setting up a regional anti-narcotics regime. No regional country should be regarded as a safe haven for drug traffickers. Pakistan and India especially should accord top priority to “drug education”.

There have been international strategies to combat narco-terrorism.[3] The United Nations led multilateral initiatives including treaties, new organizational structures and congresses. To assert the haphazard growth of the control system, the Convention of Narcotic Drugs (1961), amended by the  1972 Protocol, aimed to consolidate most of the earlier international instruments. Up to 1971, only narcotic drugs were subject to control, but growing concern over the harmful dependency effects of amphetamine- type drugs, sedative-hypnotic agents, hallucinogens, and other stimulants, led to the adoption of  the Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971). While the General Assembly Declaration on the Control of Drug Trafficking and Drug Abuse (1984) stated that its eradication was the responsibility of all states, the international conference in Vienna (1987), attended by the representatives of 138 states, about half of whom were ministers of cabinet rank, prepared the ground for a comprehensive convention.

Among a series of treaties dealing directly with narcotics, the United nations Conventions against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (19 December 1988) obliges, among other provisions, the extradition of drug traffickers. During the same year (1990) that the 1988 Convention entered into force, the General Assembly adopted a Global Programme of Action to achieve the goal of an international society free of illicit drugs. A number of bodies have been created in the U.N. organizational structure to deal with the drugs control regime.[4] There have been nine congresses, held once every five years since 1955. The United Nations established (1991) the International Drug Control Program, which coordinates all  U.N. Decade against Drug Abuse (1991-2000).[5] Some regional organizations are also committed to the struggle against narco-terrorism. The United Nations maintains working relationships with a number of interregional, intergovernmental and international organizations are also, not part of the U.N. family of organizations, but actively involved in drug control. The customs authorities of states belonging to the Customs Cooperation Council (CCC) work to harmonize customs laws and regulations, and advocate increased enforcement coordination. “Interpol” is the only international body, on the other hand, which can be requested to apprehend suspected criminals. Dozens of bilateral treaties that Britain signed, related to the confiscation of the assets of the narco-terrorists, may be model for some other states to echo and repeat.

And intense international concern over the more insidious long-term effects of chronic drug use is evident today. The problem, which has reached epidemic proportions, has its main roots in the Golden Crescent and the Golden Triangle. It needs even more cooperative action. There have been some successes to date, but  the usefulness of such international measures to contain or reduce narco-terrorism has been limited. Many more steps need to be taken especially to discourage state sponsorship of terrorism in all its manifestations. Some societies, notorious for their widespread corruption, are deeply involved in illicit economic activity. Agreements are needed on standardizing legislation, extradition, cooperation between law-enforcement agencies, and penalties.


[1] The Government of Pakistan, Pakistan Fights narcotics Menace, Islamabad, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, The Government of Pakistan, Pakistan’s Fight Against Narcotics, Islamabad, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, 1987.

[2] John Quighly, The Ruses for War, Buffalor, N.Y. Prometheus Books, 1992,

[3] International cooperation began in the early part of the 20th century. The first international conference to control the traffic in drugs was held in 1909 in Shanghai, near the source of the problem. The meeting led to the signing of the first drug control treaty (The  Hague, 1912). The League of Nations established (1920) an Advisory Committee on Traffic in Opium and other Dangerous Drugs, and the Permanent Central Narcotics Board introduced the second International Opium Convention(1925), to be followed by the 1931 and the 1936 Conventions. The las-mentioned was the first to call for the severe punishment of illicit drug traffickers.

[4] For instance, the commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND), one of ECOSOC’s six functional commissions, is the central policy-making body within the United Nations system for dealing in depth with related questions. CND’s subsidiary bodies coordinate enforcement at the regional level. The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) was established to limit the cultivation, production, manufacture and utilization of drugs and, at the same time, to ensure their availability for medical and scientific purposes.

[5] On the multi-facted approach to drug control: United nations, The United Nations and the Drug Abuse Control, New York, International Drug Control Program, 1992.

 

Home Page