|
South
Indian Inscriptions |
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT ON SOUTH INDIAN EPIGRAPHY
FOR THE YEAR 1935-36
PERSONNEL.
PART I.
During the year 1935-36, I was on leave on average pay for 3 months
and 17 days from 5th September to 21st December 1935, when Mr. G. V. Srini-
vasa Rao, the Senior Epigraphical Assistant, was appointed to hold charge of
the current duties of the office in addition to his own (vide Notification No. F.
37-8/35-F, dated 5th July 1935 and 22nd January 1936 of the Government of
India, Department of Education, Health and Lands).
2. I was on tour for about 20 days from 16th February 1936 in the
Ramnad and Tinnevelly districts, where I visited 9 villages. The Second
Epigraphical Assistant accompanied me during part of this tour. In the
course of my tour in these two districts I found the inscriptions in most of the
temples covered with repeated coatings of whitewash or paints or oily gift in
several places. The sculptures had in almost all cases lost their form and
beauty by this pernicious habit of applying white or colour wash, and I had
to impress on the Trustees of these temples the sacred duty of keeping the
inscriptions and soulptures clean and free from any coating.
2. I was on tour for about 20 days from 16th February 1936 in the Ramnad and Tinnevelly districts, where I visited 9 villages. The Second Epigraphical Assistant accompanied me during part of this tour. In the course of my tour in these two districts I found the inscriptions in most of the temples covered with repeated coatings of whitewash or paints or oily gift in several places. The sculptures had in almost all cases lost their form and beauty by this pernicious habit of applying white or colour wash, and I had to impress on the Trustees of these temples the sacred duty of keeping the inscriptions and soulptures clean and free from any coating.
|
Impelled by such observations made by me in previous years I had drawn
up a Note on the preservation of Sculptures and Inscriptions in the Madras
Presidency, which was issued as a Government Communique by the Director-
General of Archӕology in September 1935. This has been subsequently
published both in English and in the languages of the several districts in all
the District Gazettes of the Madras Presidency. Copies of the Note were
widely distributed among the several temples of the province through the
Hindu Religious Endowment Board, Madras, and also some copies were
supplied through the Superintendent, Archӕological Survey, Western circle,
to the Collectors of the several districts in the Bombay-Karnatak whose
epigraphical survey is being conducted by the Department. The Note has also
been translated in all Western India languages. It is hoped that this propa
ganda has borne fruit in several cases, though there still lingers a sentimental
regard for the old habit of applying white and colour wash to these valuable
monuments. It behoves all local officials and cultured members of the public
to educate the temple managers and pilgrims to adopt an enlightened attitude
in the matter and thus co-operate with the Government and the scholarly
world in the proper maintenance of these monuments.
3. The Senior Epigraphical Assistant was on tour for a few days in
November 1935, when he visited Hampi and secured photographs of some
interesting sculptures at the place besides copying three new inscriptions. He
toured again for a month from the 10th February 1936 in the Trichinopoly
and Tanjore districts, where he visited 9 villages and revised in situ the
readings of several damaged inscriptions of the early Chōḷas now under
publication and secured copies of 26 new inscriptions form 3 other villages.
The Second Epigraphical Assistant was on tour from the 11th February
to 21st March 1936. Besides accompanying me through part of my tour in the
Ramnad and Tinnevelly districts he visited a few villages in connection with
|
|
\D7
|