The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Preface

Introduction

Text of the Inscriptions 

Cholas

Pallava

Pandya

Vijayanagara

Hoysala

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS COLLECTED DURING THE YEAR 1906

VIRA PANDYA

No. 352

(A. R. No. 352 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukottai State, Kudumiyamalai.

Sikhanathasvami Temple --- On The North Wall Of The Akhilandesvari Shrine.

Tribh. Virapandyadeva --- 13th Year.

This is damaged. The details of the date are given as Mesha, su. Sunday, Hasta probably corresponding to A.D. 1266, April 18. The tithi should be su.13. The epigraph states that as the temple at Tirunalakkunram (Kudumiyamalai) in Ko-nadu had gone out of repairs and there was no money for its renovation, the Nattar of Kana – nadu and those connected with the temple administration sold a land called the Iluppaikkudi-vayal at Ammangainallur, which was a tirunamattukkani of the temple, to a certain devaradiyal of the temple by name Nachchiyar daughter of Durggaiyandal for 73300 kasu. Kana-nadu is said to be situated in Kunrusal-nadu a division of Ko-nadu also called Kadaladaiyadilangalkondasola-valanadu. 

No. 353

(A .R. No. 353 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukkottai State, Kudimiyamalai.

Sikhanathasvami Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Tribh. Virapandyadeva --- 13th Year. 

This is connected with No. 352 above, and registers the endorsement (kilpunaititu) of the sale of the land and acknowledgement of the receipt of the amount from the purchaser Nachchiyar by the nattar of Konadu and the temple authorities of Tirunalakkunram.

>

No. 365

(A. R. No. 365 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukkottai State, Kudumiyamalai.

Sikhanathasvami Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Tribh.Vira Pandyadeva  --- 7th Year.


This is an unfinished epigraph, evidently intended to register a sale of land fed by three wells at Karandur (village) belonging to Arasugandadevan Arasagalanjappirandan alias Ayilaiyarayan of Pulvayal (?) in Vayalaga-nadu a division of Konadu also called Kadaladaiyadilangaikonda-sola-valanadu, to the temple at Tirunalakkunram in Kunrusul-nadu. 

No. 372

(A. R. No. 372 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukkottai State, Kudumiyamalai

Melaikkoyil Rock-Cut Temple --- On The Second Gopura.

Right At Entrance.

Tribh. Virapandyadeva --- 2nd Year.

This is an interesting document. It states that the temple treasury of Tirunalakkunram Udaiya-nayanar had been burgled by priests who stole away the jewels and cash therefrom. The theft was found out and a meeting was called of all the (representative) inhabitants of the nadu, nagaram and gramam of the region, who held an enquiry into the offair. One of the priests by name Kunran Serundivanapperuman confessed to have taken 60 pon and shared it with a stonemason. He also implicated the others in the theft but they denied all knowledge of the matter. They were thereupon taken to a court at Mattukurichchi (?)  preside  over by a samanta  and ordered to prove their  innocence before the assembled people by holding a red-hot iron in their hands. The ordeal went against them as their hands were burnt and they had to confess their guilt. The culprits were all pronounced as Siva drohis and they were deprived of their holdings at I luppaikkudi, which were now transferred to the temple as Tirunamattukkani  with the cultivating right thereon (koyil ulavu murruttu). Such lands as had been sold by them to others were got back on payment of their cost by the temple and those held on mortgage were recovered without any compensation. Other private lands in the village were to continue their payment of the achchuvari and other taxes into the temple as usual.

 Home Page

>
>