|
INSCRIPTIONS
COLLECTED DURING THE YEAR 1906
PARTHIVENDRAVARMAN
No.
304
(A.
R. No. 304 of 1906)
North
Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.
Ruined
Vishnu Temple --- On The South Wall Of The Central Shrine.
Parthivendravarman
--- 3rd Year.
This
is a damaged epigraph recording a gift of gold for a perpetual lamp in
the temple of Govindapadi â Alvar by one Narayana-Kramavittan alias
Vaidumba Raditya âBrahmadhirajan of Ikkattukkottam, who deposited the
amount with the sabha of Vallam in Damarkottam for the necessary
supply of oil for the purpose, by the liquid measure Uragattuninrar-kal.
Nos.
323 & 324
(A.
R. Nos. 323 &324 of 1906)
North
Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.
Ruined
Vishnu Temple --- On The West Wall Of The Central Shrine.
Parthivendravarman.
--- 12th Year
Both
the impressions and the transcripts of these two inscriptions are now
missing. In the Annual Report for 1907, List of inscriptions, the
first epigraph is stated to be in prose and verse and to record that
Anaiyaman Paramandaladittan built a mandapa in the temple. The
second is said to be damaged and to record a gift by the Virata king
Anaiyaman. His ancestors are said to be mentioned as in No. 267 above.
No.
327
(A.
R. No. 327 of 1906)
North
Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.
Ruined
Vishnu Temple --- On The North Wall Of The Central
Parthivendravarman
Who took the head of vira â Pandya --- 10th
Year.
This
records a gift of 96 sheep for burning a perpetual lamp in the temple by
one Vanarajan Alakamaiyan.
No.
328
(A.
R. No. 328 of 1906)
North
Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.
Ruined
Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Wall.
Parthivendradivarman
--- 13th Year.
This
records an endowment of 2000 kuli of land at Sirriyarrur in
Melpalugur â nadu a division of Manaiyil-kottam, left in charge of the
vaishnavadasar managing the temple of Govindapadi â
Perumanadigal by Mannan Kannan alias Kamarmoha âaranapperaraiyar
the elephant mahout of the king, for the purpose of feeding one
Brahmana daily in the matha (attached to the temple). The land is
said to have been purchased by the donor from the temple itself.
Home
Page
|