South Indian Inscriptions - Inscriptions of Parakesarivarman @ whatisindia.com

Contents
Preface
Introduction
Text of the Inscriptions
Cholas
Pallava
Pandya
Vijayanagara
Hoysala
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS COLLECTED DURING THE YEAR 1906

PARAKESARIVARMAN

Nos. 320 & 321

(A. R. Nos. 320 & 321 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple â On The Same Wall.

Parakesarivarman â 13^th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions Vol. XIX, Nos. 318 & 319.

No. 338

(A. R. No. 338 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Parakesarivarman --- Date Lost

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 445

No. 339

(A. R. No. 339 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Parakesarivarman --- Date Lost [10?]

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 446.

No. 343

(A. R. No. 343 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Walls.

Parakesarivarman --- 8^th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 197.

(The reference wherein is wrongly given as 343 of 1907 while it should be 343 of 1906)

No. 344

(A. R. No. 344 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Walls.

Parakesarivarman --- 9^th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 220.

No. 345

(A. R. No. 345 of 1906)

Chingleput District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Uttukkadu.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Pallava Vijaya Kampavarman --- 25^th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XII, No. 108

No. 346

(A. R. No. 346 of 1906)

Chingleput District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Uttukkadu.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On A Pillar In The Mandapa In Front.

Rajakesarivarman --- 17^th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XII, No. 269

No. 347

(A. R. No. 347 of 1906)

Chingleput District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Uttukadu.

On A Stone Set Up Near The Local Tank Bund.

Parantaka I --- 32 Year (A.D. 938-39)

The inscription states that this tank was dug by Orriyur-Peruman son Narumanjirai (?) Kaliyotti of Urrukkadu a division of Urrukkattu-kottam.

No. 358

(A. R. No. 358 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukkottai State, Kudumiyamalai.

Sikhanathasvami Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Parakesarivarman ---[8]th Year.

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 198.

No. 360

(A. R. No. 360 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukkottai State, Kudumiyamalai.

Sikhanathasvami Temple --- On The South Wall Of The Second Prakara.

Jat. Virapandyadeva --- 15^th Year (A. D. 1267-68)

The king is given the attribute âwho took ilam, Kongu and Chola mandalam and after conquering the powerful king was pleased to perform the anointment of heroes and victors at Perumbarrapuliyurâ. The inscription registers a sale, as tirunamattukkani to the temple at Tirunalakkunrum, of three veli of puravu (tax-paying?) land at Visalur by the Urar of that place, at the instance of two officers of the king (Rajagomurruvar) Vanadharayar and Gangeyar and on the intercession of the Irandukarai-nattar, for 64,000 kasu. The circum stances of the sale are given, from which it would seem that the Urar had been at default for a long period in the payment of the kadamai-kilirai and had also to account for 50,000 kasu which had evidently been deposited with them out of the amount intended for the renovation of the temple. This is probably the sale-proceeds of the transaction recorded in No. 352. A supplementary sale deed is added to this record figuring the Nattar as an agency and party for the execution of the sale.

Home Page