The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Preface

Introduction

Text of the Inscriptions 

Cholas

Pallava

Pandya

Vijayanagara

Hoysala

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS COLLECTED DURING THE YEAR 1906

PARAKESARIVARMAN

 Nos. 320 & 321

(A. R. Nos. 320 & 321 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple – On The Same Wall.

Parakesarivarman – 13th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions Vol. XIX, Nos. 318 & 319. 

No. 338

(A. R. No. 338 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Parakesarivarman --- Date Lost

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 445

No. 339

(A. R. No. 339 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Wall. 

Parakesarivarman --- Date Lost [10?] 

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 446. 

>

No. 343

(A. R. No. 343 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Walls.

Parakesarivarman --- 8th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 197.

(The reference wherein is wrongly given as 343 of 1907 while it should be 343 of 1906)

No. 344          

(A. R. No. 344 of 1906)

North Arcot District, Walajapet Taluk, Tirumalpuram.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Walls.

Parakesarivarman --- 9th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 220. 

No. 345

(A. R. No. 345 of 1906)

Chingleput District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Uttukkadu.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Pallava Vijaya Kampavarman --- 25th Year

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XII, No. 108 

No. 346

(A. R. No. 346 of 1906)

Chingleput District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Uttukkadu.

Ruined Vishnu Temple --- On A Pillar In The Mandapa In Front.

Rajakesarivarman --- 17th Year 

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XII, No. 269 

 No. 347

(A. R. No. 347 of 1906)

Chingleput District, Kanchipuram Taluk, Uttukadu.

On A Stone Set Up Near The Local Tank Bund.

Parantaka I --- 32 Year (A.D. 938-39)

The inscription states that this tank was dug by Orriyur-Peruman son Narumanjirai (?) Kaliyotti of Urrukkadu a division of Urrukkattu-kottam. 

No. 358

(A. R. No. 358 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukkottai State, Kudumiyamalai.

Sikhanathasvami Temple --- On The Same Wall.

Parakesarivarman ---[8]th Year.

Published in South Indian Inscriptions, Vol. XIX, No. 198.

No. 360

(A. R. No. 360 of 1906)

Tiruchirapalli District, Pudukkottai State, Kudumiyamalai.

Sikhanathasvami Temple --- On The South Wall Of The Second Prakara.

Jat. Virapandyadeva --- 15th Year (A. D. 1267-68)

The king is given the attribute “who took ilam, Kongu and Chola mandalam and after conquering the powerful king was pleased to perform the anointment of heroes and victors at Perumbarrapuliyur”. The inscription registers a sale, as tirunamattukkani to the temple at Tirunalakkunrum, of three veli of puravu (tax-paying?) land at Visalur by the Urar of that place, at the instance of two officers of the king (Rajagomurruvar) Vanadharayar and Gangeyar and on the intercession of the Irandukarai-nattar, for 64,000 kasu. The circum stances of the sale are given, from which it would seem that the Urar had been at default for a long period in the payment of the kadamai-kilirai and had also to account for 50,000 kasu which had evidently been deposited with them out of the amount intended for the renovation of the temple. This is probably the sale-proceeds of the transaction recorded in No. 352. A supplementary sale deed is added to this record figuring the Nattar as an agency and party for the execution of the sale.

>

Home Page

>
>