PART-I
SANSKRIT INSCRIPTIONS
THE PALLAVA INSCRIPTIONS ON THE KAILASANTHA TEMPLE AT KANCHIPURAM
On a visit to Kanchipuram in the year 1883, Dr. Burgess made the
important discovery, that the comparatively insignificant temple of
Kailasanathasvamin at Kanchipuram (Conjeeveram) was not only built
in the Pallava style of sixth century architecture, but contained a
number of inscriptions in the Pallava character and Sanskrit
language besides others in the Tamil alphabet and language. In
1884-85, Mr. S. M. Natesa Sastri prepared face-smiles of most of the
Pallava inscriptions, from which I made transcripts and
translations. In September and October 1887, I went to the spot
myself, in order to compare these transcripts with the originals and
to take face-smiles of those inscriptions, which were not found
amount these made by Mr. Natesa. Through the good offices of E. C.
Johnson, Esq., the Collector of Chinglepet, I was enabled to secure
reliable copies of all the Sanskrit and Tamil inscriptions of the
temple.
Just as at Mamallapuram and Saluvankuppam, we find several different
alphabets employed in the Pallava inscriptions of the Kailasanatha
Temple. The most archaic alphabet, which resembles that of the
inscriptions of Atyantakama at Mamallapuram, occurs in the subjoined
inscriptions Nos. 24,27, 28, and 30. Of these, the inscription No.24
runs round the outside of the central shrine and is in excellent
preservation, as it is engraved on granite slabs. It consists of
twelve Sanskrit verses. The whole of the first verse and the
beginning of the second are covered by the floor of the temple
itself and by the wall of a modern mandapa, which has been
erected between the central shrine and another mandapa in
front of it. By the temporary removal of some slabs, my assistant
succeeded in preparing face-smiles of the greater part of the first
verse and of a few additional letters at the beginning of the second
verse. The inscription opens with benediction addressed to Ganga and
with the following mythical pedigree of Pallava, the of the Pallava
dynasty: -
[
Brahman]
|
Angiras
|
Brihaspati
|
Samyu
|
Bharadvaja
|
Drona
|
Asvatthama
|
Pallava,
the founder of the race of the Pallavas
Then
the inscription continues: âIn the race of these (the Pallavas)
there was born the supreme lord Ugrdanda, the destroyer of the
city of Ranarasika.â His son was Rajasimha, who bore the birudas
Atyantakama, Sribhara and Ranajaya. He built the Siva temple,
round which the inscription is engraved, and called it after his own
name Rajasimha-Pallavesvara or Rajasimhesvar.
The
inscription No.27 runs round the smaller shrine, which stands in
front of the Rajasimhesvara or Kailasantha shrine, and which is now
days styled Naradesvara. It consists of four Sanskrit verses, the
first and last of which are only incompletely preserved. The first
three verses tell in different wording the same fact, viz., that
Mahendra, the son of Rajasimha and grandson of Lokaditya, built a
temple of Siva, which he called Mahendrasvara after his own name,
near the temple of Rajasimhevsvara. Another form of the name of the
temple, Mahendravarmesvara, which is engraved three times on the
building, shows that Mahendraâs full name was Mahendravarman. Of
Lokaditya, who is identical with the Ugrdanda of the inscription
No.24, the present inscription says, that âhis valor dried up the
army of Ranarasik, just s the heat of the sun does the mud.â
Other
inscriptions in archaic characters are found in some of the niches
to the right of the front entrance into the temple compound, which
are now connected by brick walls, but were originally intended for
detached small shrines. According to the inscription No.28, the
first niche was called âthe Temple of Nityvinitesvaraâ.
Of
No. 29, on the third niche, complete face-smiles were obtained by
temporarily removing two modern brick walls. It consists of three
Sanskrit verses and records, that this small shrine of Siva was
founded by Rangapataka, the wife of king Narasimhvishnu or Kalakala.
No.
30, on the fifth niche, is an incomplete inscription in Sanskrit
verse of some other female, whose name is unfortunately lost.
The
rest of the Pallava inscriptions of the Kailasanatha Temple run
round the inside of the enclosure of the Rajsimhesvara shrine and
contain an enumeration of several hundred birudas of kind
Rajasimha. They are arranged in four tiers are on sand-stone; hence
the second is almost entirely spoiled by the dripping of water and
by whitewashing with chunnam; of the third a little more is left;
and the fourth is in tolerable preservation. From the existing
fragments of the second and third tiers, it appears that they were
word for word identical with the well-preserved first tier. Further
we can prove in a few cases, that the first tier is later copy of
third. In accordance with this result, the third tier is written in
the same archaic alphabet, as the inscription round the
Rajasimhesvara Temple, and evidently belongs to the time of
Rajasimha, the founder of the temple, himself. Thus the first and
second tiers must be considered as later copies of the original
inscription in the third tier, which were executed by some
descendants of Rajasimha. As the alphabets of the first and second
tiers resemble those of the northern and southern walls,
respectively, of the Saluvankuppan Cave, it further follows that
Atiranachanda, who engraved the inscription n the northern wall of
the Saluvankuppam Cave, must be later than Atyantakama, the alphabet
of whose inscriptions at Mamallapuram resembles that of
Rajasimhaâs at Kanchipuram.
The inscription n the southern wall of
the Saluvankuppan Cave is a later transcript of that on the northern
wall, and in the same way the second tier is still more modern than
the first tier. As only fragments of the second and third tiers are
now forthcoming, I have transcribed only the first tier and noticed
the various readings of the second and third tiers in the footnotes.
While the inscriptions of the first, second and third tiers run
round the whole of the inner enclosure of the temple, the
inscriptions of the fourth tier extent only as far as the 20th
niche. The fourth tier repeats some of the birudas contained
in the first three tiers and adds a few of its own. It is written in
a peculiar ornamental alphabet, which is based on an alphabet of the
same type, as that of the first tier. As the biruda which
occurs in the third tier (niche 19), but is left out in the first,
is found in the fourth tier (niche 11), it follows that the engraver
of the fourth tier copied from the third and not from the first
tier; perhaps the first and fourth tiers were contemporaneous.
It
remains to add a few words on the probable times of the founders of
the Kailasanatha Temple. In an article, which appeared first in the Madras
Mail (3rd September 1887) and was reprinted in the Indian
Antiquary (Vol. XVII, p. 30), I identified: - 1. Ranarasika, the
enemy of Ugrdanda or Lokaditya, with the Chalukya Ranaraga; 2.
Rajasimha, who is called Narasimhapotavarman in a Chalukya
inscription, with Narasimhavarman I. Of Mr. Foulkesâ grant; 3. Mahendravarman with Mehardravarman II. Of the same grant; 4.
Nadipotavarman, who was defeated by the Chalukya Vikramaditya II.,
with Nadivarman himself; and 5. Pulakesin, who, according to the
unpublished Kuram grant, was conquered by Narasimhavarman I., with
the Nandivarman, Narasimhavarman I. Is said to have destroyed Vatapi,
while Pulikesin I. âfirst made Vatapi the capital of the Chalukyas
in Western India, wresting it from the Pallavas who then held it,â
â I now consider it more probable, that Pulakesin, the enemy of
Narasimhavarman I., has to be identified with the Chalukya Pulikesin
II. On inspecting the original of the Kuram grant, of which formerly
had nothing but an impression, but which has now become the property
of Government, I discovered a further confirmation of t his view.
The grant says, that Paramesvaravarman (I.) put to flight
Vikramaditya, i.e., Vikramaditya I., the son of Pulikesin II.
Secondly, it is not unlikely, that Narsaimhavishnu, whose wife built
the third niche to the right in front of the Kailasanatha Temple, is
another name of Rajasimha, the founder of the central shrine. Under
this supposition, I would now identify Rajasimha (alias Narasihapotavarman
and Narasimhvishnu) with Simhavishnu, and his son Mahendravarman
with Mahervarman I. Of Mr. Foulkesâ grant. The subjoined table
shows the synchronisms between the Chalukyas and Pallavas.
|
>
|
Pedigree
of the Chalukyas |
Pedigree
of the Pallavas |
Mr.
Foulkes' grant of Nandivarman |
Kuram
grant |
Kailasanatha
inscriptions |
Ranaraga
|
Pulikesin
I
|
Kirtivarman
I
(until
Saka 489)
|
Pulikesin
II
(Saka
532 and 556)
|
Vikramaditya
I
(Saka
592 (?) to 602 (?))
|
Vinayaditya
(Saka
603 (?) to 618)
|
Vijayaditya
(Saka
618 to 655)
|
Vikramaditya
II
(Saka
655 to 669) defeated Nandipotavarman |
Simhavishnu
|
Mahendravarman
I
|
Narasimhavarman
I destroyer of Vatapi
|
Mahenderavarman
II
|
Paramesvaravarman
I
|
Narasimhavarman
II
|
Paramesvaravarman
II
|
Nandivarman |
Narasimhavarman,
conqueror of Pulakesin and destroyer of Vatapi
|
Mahenderavarman
|
Paramesvaravarman
defeated Vikramaditya |
Ugradanda
or Lokaditya, destroyer of the army and town of Ranarasiku
|
Rajasimha
or Narasimhavishnu (alias Narasimhapotavarman), married to
Rangapataka
|
Mahendravarman
|
If
new discoveries should prove the above arrangement to be correct,
the date of the foundation of the Rajasimhesvara and
Mahendravarmesvara Temples would fall some time before 567 A.D., the
date of the end of the first Kirtivarmanâs reign, say about 550
A.D. This would also be the time of Atyantakamaâs inscriptions at
Mamallapuram. Atiranachandaâs inscriptions at Saluvankuppam belong
to a later, and Narasimhaâs on the Dharmaraja Ratha at
Mamallapuram to an earlier period.
Home
Page
|
>
|