Harsha, . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . ..xxvi.
Kalachuri, (s.a. Chēdī), i- xxx; first discovery
of its dates, i; first conje-
cture about
its epoch in 250 A.C.
by Fitz-Edward Hall
i, ii; its epoch-
placed in 249 A.C. by Cunningh
am ii; identified with the Traikū
ṭa-
ka era and its epoch fixed in 244-
45 A.C.
by Bhagvanlal’s iii, iv; its
epoch changed
to 249-50 A.C by Cunningham iv;
Bhagvanlal’s theor
y about its foundation
by the Ābhī-
ra Īśvaradatta, iv-v; Kiel
horn’s vi-
ew about its commencement on
pūrṇimānta Bhādrapada śu. di. 1
, 28th July
249 A.C., iv; proporti-
on of current
and expired years ac
cording to thisepoch,
v-vi; R. G. Bhandarkar’s objection, v;
Kielho-
rn’s revised view about I ts com
m-
encement on pūrṇimānta Āśvina śu.
di.
I, 5th September 248 A.C., vi; S-
h.
B. Dikshit’s view about the comm-
ence
ment of its year on pūrṇimānta
Āś-
vina va. di. I, vii; Fleet’s view th-
at its
founder was the Ābhīra Īśvara-
sēna, not
Īśvaradatta, vii; Rapson’s
view that it
dates from the consolida-
tion of Ābhīra
power vii; R.C. Maju-
mdar’s view that
it was founded by a Kushāṇa Emperor,
viii; objections to
this view, viii; Jayas
wal’s view that it
was started by the Vā
kāṭakas, ix; ob
jections to this view,
ix; dates of the in
scriptions of the Maghas referred to it,
ix; objections to this view,
x; its year co
mmenced on Kārttika śu.
di. I, x; da-
tes of the inscriptions of the
Mahārājas
of Khandesh, Subandhu and
Śrīdhar
avarman referred to it, x; a
new epoch
of it (250-51 A.C.) shown
by the Nag
ardhan plates of Svāmirāja,
xi; different epochs shown by its two
groups of dat-
es, xi; early dates of the era
(1) in expi-
red years, xi; (ii) in current
years xii; re-
sults obtained from examination of its
early dates, xiii; its com
mencement on amānta Kārttika śu. di I
(25th Septem-
ber) in 249 A.C., xiv;
its later dates-(i)
in expired years, xiv-xx;
(ii) in current
years, xx-xxi; results obtain
ed from examination of its later dates,
xxi; its commencement on pūrṇimānta
Kārt-
tika śu. di. 1 (6th October) in 248
A.C. xxii; reconciliation of the two
Ep-
ochs, xxii; origin of the era, xxii;
its na-
mes, Chēdi-saṁvat and Kalachuri sa
ṁvat, xxii; provenance of its early
dat-
es, xxiii; its original home, xxiii;
political conditions which led to its |
|
foundation, xxiii; rise of Ābhīra Īśvara-
sēna, the founder of the era, xxiv;.. . Īś
varasēna not identical with Īśvaradatta,
xxv; the era originated in an .extension of
the regnal dates of Īśvarasēna, .xxv;
it originated in Maharashtra andspread to
Gujarat, Konkan and north ....of the
Narmadā, xxvi; used by the . . Ābhīras
and their feudatories, xxvi; by Śrīdhara
varman, Subandhu and Saṅgamasiṁha,
xxvi; by the Traikūṭakas, . .xxvi; by the
Kalachuris of Māhishmatī, . . .and their
feudatories, xxvi; by the Early Gurjar-
as,
xxvi; by the Sēndrakas, xxvii; by t-
he
Gujarat Chālukyas, xxvii; by the Ha
ris
chandrīyas, xxvii,supplanted by. the Śaka
era in Maharashtra and Southern
Gujarat, xxvii; supplanted by the Vika-
rma era in North Gujarat, xxvii; spread
to North India with the extension of
K-
alachuri power, xxvii; used by the
Ka-
lachuri Emperors of Tripurī and their
f-
eudatories, xxviii; used in the Dhurēti
p
lates of Chandēlla Trailōkyamalla, xxv-
iii;
vanished from North India with the
downfall of the Kalachuris of Tripurī,
xxviii; introduced into Chhattisgarh by
a branch of the Kalachuris xxviii; used
there by the Kalachuris and their ..feu-
datories, xxviii; began to lose . .ground there
also after 1220 A.C., xxix;
Jovian years
used in its dates, (i) of the twelve-
year cycle and (ii) of the sixty-year
cycle, xxix; intercalary months in its
dates, xxix; irregular tithis in its
dates, xxix; current tithis in its dates,
xxix; special names of tithis mentioned in
its dates, xxx, nakshatras mentioned in its
dates, . . . . . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. . ... xxx.
Kanishka, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. viii.
Kushāṇa, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . xxv.
Śaka, 6 and n., 14, 111 n.,. 112, 167, 384, 570,
574, 579, i, iii, xxvii, xxix and n.
Traikūṭaka, (s.a. Kalachuri), 30, iv, vii.
Ērakaña, Ērikiña, or Erakiṇa s.a. Ēraṇ,
tn., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609 and n.
Ērikiṇa, s.a. Ēraṇ, . . . ..606, 609, 610, xxxviii, xxxix,
and n., cxliii.
Ēraṇ, vi., . . . . . . . . . . . 605, 607-609, xxxviii.
Ēraṇ stone inscription of Samudragup-
ta,
xxxix n.
Ēraṇ stone pillar inscription of Budh-
agupta,
17, 608.
|
