The Indian Analyst
 

South Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Introduction

Preface

Contents

List of Plates

Abbreviations

Additions And Corrections

Images

Miscellaneous

Inscriptions And Translations

Kalachuri Chedi Era

Abhiras

Traikutakas

Early Kalachuris of Mahishmati

Early Gurjaras

Kalachuri of Tripuri

Kalachuri of Sarayupara

Kalachuri of South Kosala

Sendrakas of Gujarat

Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Dynasty of Harischandra

Administration

Religion

Society

Economic Condition

Literature

Coins

Genealogical Tables

Texts And Translations

Incriptions of The Abhiras

Inscriptions of The Maharajas of Valkha

Incriptions of The Mahishmati

Inscriptions of The Traikutakas

Incriptions of The Sangamasimha

Incriptions of The Early Kalcahuris

Incriptions of The Early Gurjaras

Incriptions of The Sendrakas

Incriptions of The Early Chalukyas of Gujarat

Incriptions of The Dynasty of The Harischandra

Incriptions of The Kalachuris of Tripuri

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

RELIGION

Kalachuris from the 8th to the 12th century A.C. It received a great fillip during the reign of Yuvaraājadēva I, who, under the influence of his queen Nōhalā invited several Āchāryas of the Mattamayūra clan to the Chēdi country and built magnificent temples of Śiva and monasteries for them at Gurgi, Masaun, Chandrēhē, Bilhēri Bhēri-Ghāt and other places. As these Āchārya exercised a profound influence on the political and religious history of the period, it would not be out of place to give here a somewhat detailed account of this clan

The earlier inscription of the Mattamayura clan, which was discovered at Ranod in the foremen Gwalior state, was edited by Dr. Kielhorn in the Epigraphia Indica, Vol. I, pp. 351 ff. It gives the following earliest genealogy of the line. It is to be remembered that the genealogy is spiritual, i.e., not from father to son, but from guru to disciple.
images/cliii

We learn from the inscription that when the king, the illustrious Avantivarman, who desired to be initiated in the Siava faith, heard of the great holiness of the sage Puran dara, he attempted to bring him to his own country. He himself went to Upendrapura where the sage was practicing penance, and with a great difficulty persuaded him to accede to his request. The sage founded a matha at Mattamayura, the capital of the king whom he initiated in the Saiva faith, and established another matha at Ranipadra (modern Ranod) The last Acharya mentioned in the genealogy, viz., Vyomasiva enlarged and repaired the matha, erected temples and excavated a magnificent tank at the same place.

Another inscription of his line, discovered somewhere in the former Gwalior state and now deposited in the Gwalior Museum, gives the same genealogy as above, except for the Substitution of Rudrasiva for Amardakatirthanatha.1 It will be noticed that the personal names of the first four Acharyas in the genealogical list have not been given. The name of the fourth Acharya is thus known from the Gwalior Museum inscription. Again, this record carries the genealogy one generation further and mentions Patangasambhu as the disciple of Vyomasambhu.2

t>

The Ranod inscription is undated; but on paæology grounds, Dr. Kielhorn referred it ot the end of the tenth or the beginning of the eleventh century A.C.3 the
__________________

1I am indebeted to Mr. M. B. Garde, late Director Archæolgy, Gwalior state, who first supplied to me an account of this inscription Dr. D.R. Patil, the present Director of Archæology in Madhya Bharat, has also obliged me by sending me an impression of it.
2The members of this clan who belonged to the Śaiva not the Pāśupata sect bore names ending in śiva or śambhu. The names of the Pāśupatas generally ended in rāśi
3Ep. ind., Vol. 1, p. 353

 

  Home Page