|
SUPPLEMENTARY INSCRIPTIONS
__________________________
[1] We should read here either sadyaḥ, or adya, dropping the visarga.
[2] It is incorrect as it should be -nṛita-, but it cannot be known whether it is a mistake in the original
or in the transcript.
[3] This verse is separate from the preceding one is only conjectural from Lele’s transcript. It is not possible to know if some more aksharas are lost here.
[4] One long letter is missing after da.
[5] Prosodically, the bracketed letter should be long.
[6] Read  .
[7] Sandhi is violated here.
[8] As the stone is broken on both the vertical sides, it is not possible to ascertain as to how many of
these letters are lost at the end of this line and how many at the beginning of the next line. This
is to be noted in cases of the other breaks also.
[9] Read  .
[10] Probably the date was given in the end. The break in this verse may perhaps indicate that the gift
was made by the king Subhaṭavarman, whose name was possibly shown, for metrical exigencies, by
the letters Suvarmaṇā just fitting at the end of the first hemistich of the stanza. This is also justified by taking  as one compound word, taken a two by Lele, which cannot be construed
properly.
|
