North Indian Inscriptions

Contents
Index
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Images
EDITION AND TEXTS
Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti
An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala
Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar
Supplementary-Inscriptions
Index
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE CHANDELLAS OF JEJAKABHUKTI

villages are now included in the Khurai tehsīl of the Sāgar District, which is separated by the Vetravatī from the Vidishā District. If this identification is correct, it also appears almost certain that the Sūḍali vishava, in which these places are said to have been then included, denoted the region lying to the east of the river and more or less comprising the modern tehsīl of Khurai (now in the Sāgar District).

TEXT^[1]
[Metre : Verses 1-2 Anushṭubh ].

_____________________
^[1] From facsimile accompanying Kielhorn’s article in Ind. Ant., Vol. XVI.
^[2] Denoted by a symbol.
^[3] The superscript of this letter is so formed as to appear a combination of the palatal and the dental sibilant, and in the subscript of the same letter that follows, it is shown by a serif.
^[4] The sign of punctuation is superfluous and the name that follows can also be read as .

^[5] The consonant of the last akshara of the name appears to have been changed subsequently. Looking to other instances in the record we cannot be certain whether it is ḍ or d.
^[6] The whole akshara is struck out but it cannot be dhō as conjectured by Kielhorn. For , see n. above, means ‘belonging to’.
^[7] The consonant of this akshara can also be read as .
^[8] It literally means a pillar (marking the boundary).
^[9]This expression, which is an example of madhyama-padalōpī samāsa means ‘an ant-hill by a madhūka tree’.
^[10] The first akshara of this expression looks the archaic ta.
^[11] The punctuation-marks are unnecessary, as some others in this and the following lines. They are not marked here. The same we find in the Sēmrā grant, below, No. 126.
^[12] The syllable in brackets also looks like ḍha but it seems to be intended for ṭa, which is all the more certain from a comparison of it in the name Sūḍha in l. 19, below, which is so read in the light of the next inscription. Ṭakārī (and not Ḍhakārī) appears as a famous place in some other plates also.

Page 66 - >>

<< - 64 Page

Home Page