North Indian Inscriptions

Contents
Index
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Images
EDITION AND TEXTS
Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti
An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala
Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar
Supplementary-Inscriptions
Index
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE CHANDELLAS OF JEJAKABHUKTI

GWĀLIOR STONE INSCRIPTION OF MAHĪPĀLA

No. 155 ; PLATE CXXXXII

GWĀLIOR STONE INSCRIPTION OF MAHĪPĀLA

Vikrama Year 1150

THIS inscription is engraved on two long stone slabs which were found inside the portico of the larger of the two neighbouring temples locally known by the name of Sāsbahū and situated on a projecting point near the middle of the eastern wall of the fortress of Gwālior, the headquarters of a district in Madhya Pradesh. The record was noticed by General Alexander Cunningham in his Archaeological Survey of India Reports, Volume II (1862-1865), pp. 357 ff., and from a facsimile supplied by him, it was edited by Rajendralal Mitra, with transcript and an abstract of its contents, in the Journal of the Bengal Asiatic Society, Vol. XXXI (1862), pp. 400 and 411 ff. It was re-edited, with translation and a facsimile, by F. Kielhorn in
____________________________
¹ Sandhi is not made here.
² The reading is certain, though the last letter is mutilated. But the name appears to be rather long and peculiar.
³ This akshara was totally lost even in Kielhorn’s time. From the context it appears to have been di.
⁴ At the end of the line there are two redundant curves, as also at the end of the next line. Gōshṭhika is a member of the managing committee.
⁵ After ni there are six redundant curves, as also after dra in the next line.
⁶ It is a coin, for which see C. I. I., Vol. IV, p. 195, n.
⁷ The daṇḍa is intended to show a paranthesis that follows. The grammar requires vāṭikāṁ.
⁸ Sandhi is not made here.

Page 203 - >>

<< - 201 Page

Home Page