The Indian Analyst
 

North Indian Inscriptions

 

 

Contents

Index

Introduction

Contents

List of Plates

Images

EDITION AND TEXTS

Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti

An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala

Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar

Supplementary-Inscriptions

Index

Other South-Indian Inscriptions 

Volume 1

Volume 2

Volume 3

Vol. 4 - 8

Volume 9

Volume 10

Volume 11

Volume 12

Volume 13

Volume 14

Volume 15

Volume 16

Volume 17

Volume 18

Volume 19

Volume 20

Volume 22
Part 1

Volume 22
Part 2

Volume 23

Volume 24

Volume 26

Volume 27

Tiruvarur

Darasuram

Konerirajapuram

Tanjavur

Annual Reports 1935-1944

Annual Reports 1945- 1947

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1

Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2

Epigraphica Indica

Epigraphia Indica Volume 3

Epigraphia
Indica Volume 4

Epigraphia Indica Volume 6

Epigraphia Indica Volume 7

Epigraphia Indica Volume 8

Epigraphia Indica Volume 27

Epigraphia Indica Volume 29

Epigraphia Indica Volume 30

Epigraphia Indica Volume 31

Epigraphia Indica Volume 32

Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2

Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2

Vākāṭakas Volume 5

Early Gupta Inscriptions

Archaeological Links

Archaeological-Survey of India

Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE CHANDELLAS OF JEJAKABHUKTI

AHĀR STATUE INSCRIPTION OF THE TIME OF PARAMARDIDĒVA

of Lalitpur in the Jhānsī District and about 90 kms. south-southeast of Jhānsī itself.1 Vasuhāṭikā where the family resided (l. 2), cannot be identified. It may, however, be pointed out that a village of the name of Hāṭa lies about 45 kms. due east of Bāṇapur. Similarly, we have no definite clue to identify Ānandapura (v. 3) ; and last of all, Madanēśasāgarapura (v. 3), as already mentioned above, is Ahār itself, where the inscription was found.2

TEXT3

[Metres : Verse 1 Āryā ; vv. 2, 4 and 5 Vasantatilakā ; v. 3 Śārdūlavikrīḍita ; v. 6 Rathōddhatā ; v. 7 Anushṭubh].

>

___________________________
1 I am indebted to Shri B. C. Jain for the information that this place contains an old temple which may probably be identified with the Sahasrakūṭa of the inscription.
2 Traditionally, the place is still so called as I came to know in my visit to it.
3 From an impression.
4 Denoted by a symbol.
5 The sign of the mātrā of this akshara resembles the subscript n and the preceding akshara is deformed by an additional wrong stroke of the chisel.
6 Both these aksharas, which are now lost, have been conjecturally restored from the context.
7 Owing to a wrong stroke of the chisel, the bracketed aksharas look more like
8 The first of the aksharas in the brackets is damaged and the sign of mātrā on the second is not distinct on the impression. It may have been clear on the original.
9 The letter in the brackets was originally engraved with the sign of visarga, which was later on changed to the mātrā.
10 The first akshara of the name was originally omitted in writing and was later on inserted just above its proper place, in a smaller size. The pada-chhēda shows that possibly the name may also have been Udayachandra, but to accept it would involve a literary error
(Vidhēyāvimarsha). 11 These letters indicate the end of recording the main purpose.
12 These four aksharas have been restored from the traces left.
13 The whole of this line which has faintly and partly come out in the impression, has been restored from the traces left, and the reading
has been finalised with the help of the brochure referred to above.

Home Page

>
>