North Indian Inscriptions

Contents
Index
Introduction
Contents
List of Plates
Images
EDITION AND TEXTS
Inscriptions of the Chandellas of Jejakabhukti
An Inscription of the Dynasty of Vijayapala
Inscriptions of the Yajvapalas of Narwar
Supplementary-Inscriptions
Index
Other South-Indian Inscriptions
Volume 1	Volume 2
Volume 3	Vol. 4 - 8
Volume 9	Volume 10
Volume 11	Volume 12
Volume 13	Volume 14
Volume 15	Volume 16
Volume 17	Volume 18
Volume 19	Volume 20
Volume 22 Part 1	Volume 22 Part 2
Volume 23	Volume 24
Volume 26	Volume 27
Tiruvarur	Darasuram
Konerirajapuram	Tanjavur
Annual Reports 1935-1944	Annual Reports 1945- 1947
Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 2, Part 2	Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum Volume 7, Part 3
Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 1	Kalachuri-Chedi Era Part 2
Epigraphica Indica	Epigraphia Indica Volume 3
Epigraphia Indica Volume 4	Epigraphia Indica Volume 6
Epigraphia Indica Volume 7	Epigraphia Indica Volume 8
Epigraphia Indica Volume 27	Epigraphia Indica Volume 29
Epigraphia Indica Volume 30	Epigraphia Indica Volume 31
Epigraphia Indica Volume 32	Paramaras Volume 7, Part 2
Śilāhāras Volume 6, Part 2	Vākāṭakas Volume 5
Early Gupta Inscriptions
Archaeological Links
Archaeological-Survey of India
Pudukkottai

INSCRIPTIONS OF THE CHANDELLAS OF JEJAKABHUKTI

TEXT¹

[Metres: Verse 1 Śārdūlavikrīḍita ; vv. 3-7 Anushṭubh].

________________________
¹ From facsimile in Ind. Ant., Vol. XVI.
² Denoted by a symbol.
³ Here and in some cases below, which are not separately noted, the sign of punctuation is redundant.
⁴ That is, Karṇa. The consonant of the preceding is not well formed.
⁵ The akshara in the brackets was originally omitted and was later on written below the line with an arrow-mark to draw attention, but after the sign ofvisarga and not before where it is actually to be supplied. This was not noted by Kielhorn.
⁶ Better read --.

⁷ The reading of the consonant of this akshara, as also noted by Kielhorn, is not certain. In that precedes, the vertical showing the mātrā in the third akshara is detached from it so as to look like a daṇḍa.
⁸ This akshara, which was originally omitted, is writing below the line but without an arrow-mark to draw attention to it as in n. 4, absent.
⁹ Kielhorn read , but to me it appears to be as given here. What follows the point of is a chisel-stroke and not the bend.
¹⁰ The reading of the first akshara of the name is not certain. Moreover, no sandhi is made here as also in that precedes.
The Sanskrit form of the name that follows is .
¹¹ This akshara is followed by two small dots vertically placed. It cannot be ascertained whether they form she sign of the visarga
inserted subsequently or are merely stokes of the chisel.
¹² This word is not known in dictionaries. The context, however, shows that vāha, water-ourse, is intended. See n. on this word in
No. 4, l. 11, above. The word vāha occurs also in No. 100, l. 10.

Page 27 - >>

<< - 25 Page

Home Page