India Intelligence Report

 

 

   No Ore Exports Say CMs

  The Chief Ministers (CMs) of Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, and West Bengal (WB), have written to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh opposing proposals to liberalize iron ore exports warning disastrous effects on the fast growing Steel industry.
 

 

Hot Topics

No Ore Exports Say CMs
ASEAN Unified Market by 2015
ONGC Proposes to Buyout Sakhalin-I
Iran Proposes Talks to Resolve Stalemate
First Indo-Russian Joint Study Group on Trade
Grid Synchronized with Power from Bhutan

 

Other Stories

ASEAN Unified Market by 2015
First Indo-Russian Joint Study Group on Trade
Grid Synchronized with Power from Bhutan
Iran Proposes Talks to Resolve Stalemate
ONGC Proposes to Buyout Sakhalin-I
   

The Chief Ministers (CMs) of Karnataka, Chhattisgarh, and West Bengal (WB), have written to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh opposing proposals to liberalize iron ore exports warning disastrous effects on the fast growing Steel industry. Responding to the proposal from a high-level committee reviewing the National Mineral Policy, the CMs of the mineral rich states argued that this move is "not in our national interest." CMs of other mineral rich states such as Jharkhand, Orissa, and Chhattisgarh have already opposed the Hooda Committee's recommendations reportedly having received Government approval.

WB CM Buddhadev Bhattacharjee wrote "Removing all quantitative and qualitative restrictions will surely result in the export of our best quality ores, deplete our finite and meager reserves at a much faster rate and starve the domestic industry of a raw material on which its very survival depends." They also opposed other controversial suggestions that would allow the Federal Government to interfere with mining lease processes and to circumvent due process to accelerate the entry of major global players. The CMs argue that these moves will damage "Domestic industry" chances to succeed as they need "assured supply of iron ore" especially when the nation has asked for and obtained commitments for "accelerated development." Indian steel manufacturers are planning to grow from 40 million tons (mt) to more than 100 mt by 2012.

While global steel majors like Mittal Steel and Posco want liberalization of mining process so they can invest up to 100% in {foreign direct investment (FDI)} for both iron ore export and captive coal mining. A Group of Ministers had already approved this in concept. Domestic majors such as Tata Steel and Steel Authority of India (SAIL) want exports of scarce resources such as high-grade iron ore banned. They contend that the global steel players promise to set up plants in India but their main intention is to export high quality ore to their installed capacities elsewhere.

Unbridled export of high quality of ore to Japan and China have been vociferously opposed by many constituents but lobbying and backroom deal making had always brushed aside alarms as protectionism. Some window dressing announcements sought to appease opposition by cutting back on export limits to Japan and Korea but these measures miss the bigger picture.

India and Brazil are the only nations with such high class iron ore with iron content of between 60-65% and India is estimated to have 18 billion tons of high grade ore, albeit in inaccessible forested areas. Since there are very few benefits and infrastructure benefits accruing from the Government, domestic steel players have to contend with raw material exporters, who are usually politically backed, sending away one of the few advantages they have against their competitors.

Instead of focusing on domestic steel production, cabinet ministers have been advocating export of ore as quick means to achieve balance of payment (with China) and business parity (with Japan). The Federal Government must abandon this plan to export iron ore and provide liberalization for domestic production of steel to all players-domestic and global. While it is correct to say that export of ore will damage domestic steel production incentives, it is incorrect to argue that allowing global steel players in will only result in exports of raw materials. WB does have vested stakes with domestic players as SAIL recently announced Rs. 10,300 crore (USD 2.2 billion) in that state but the message it sends is beyond such petty considerations and is in the national interest.

Furthermore, while it is correct to argue for domestic investments to add value to raw materials, it does not make sense to argue that only the State Government has the right or the Federal Government has no right to interfere. After all, the mines are a national resource and while the states should reap a majority of the benefits of the raw material, their reward should be measured in terms of their cooperation to the national government to start industries, lack of corruption, infrastructure investments, and transparency. For example, the opposition by the Jharkhand Government to SAIL's plan to invest Rs. 8000-10,000 crore (USD 1.739-2.173 billion) in Chiria because they favored other players smacks of underhand dealings especially because they are not disclosing alternate proposals that would benefit the state even more.

The communists have already opposed the export of iron ore citing "China and some other countries" as examples.