|
World
|
-
The
US President George Bush and
Indian Prime Minister Manmohan
Singh made history by
resuscitating the civilian nuclear
deal that most people thought
dead. In a surprising move, Bush
said that he would lobby the
Congress to get India an exemption
so the US will allow the flow of
technology and nuclear fuel
without India signing the nuclear
non-proliferation treaty (NPT).
The NPT is a containment mechanism
created by non-nuclear weapons
states (NWS) so they can keep
those without nuclear weapons that
way into perpetuity. Although the
NPT required the gradual nuclear
disarmament, the destruction of
weapons with the nuclear haves has
been slow. India held out because
it said that the NPT is
discriminatory. Israel held out
because it did not want its
nuclear research to be inspected
by the International Atomic Energy
Agency (IAEA); many say that
Israel already possesses a nuclear
weapon and it is this ambiguity
that gives it security. Pakistan
held out because India did. The
Indo-US civilian nuclear deal is
seen as a mechanism by the US to
bring the same conditions and
controls of the NPT on India but
without requiring it to sign one.
India had been arguing that it
will not bring fast breeder
reactors (FBRs) into the deal and
open them for inspection because
of its military (plutonium weapons
program) and technology strategic
value. The second argument is more
important to India because FBRs if
successful will enable India
produce energy using Thorium, a
resource that only India has; the
net result is that India may be
able to become self-sufficient in
energy and also export this
technology. The Global Nuclear
Energy Partnership was brought in
as an alternative by the US where
it will legitimize the existence
of the nuclear supplier group (NSG),
the 5 acknowledged NWS, and the
nuclear recipient states. Bush
highlighted this aspect when he
suddenly called India a nuclear
recipient state and not a state
“with advanced nuclear
technology.” So, the great news
for India is that it will be
allowed access US (and all other
NWSs’) nuclear technology and
fuel without constraints on its
FBR program. For US, it is the
start of a partnership with the
largest democracy, with one of the
fastest growing economies, and
useful counter weight to China.
While the fine print on the deal
still needs analysis, the visit so
far will generate an upswing in
the relations. There are many more
hurdles along the way—the
Government’s communists and
myopic allies and the political
extremists in the US Congress. The
other hurdles include those within
the NSG like China who are opposed
to India getting special treatment
and want its ally Pakistan to get
a sweetheart deal even if it is an
acknowledged proliferator. Then,
there are the nuclear ayatollahs
in the US who wants nuclear
isolation of India at all costs.
If Bush can clear the hurdles on
these fronts and India can
convince the Bharatiya Janata
Party on intellectual grounds to
support the deal, it does not have
to get the communist support. The
communist parties in India oppose
the deal because it is with the US
and argue that Iran should get the
same treatment that India is
offered. Most Indian analysts
believe that the Indian communist
parties do not have a clear grasp
on issues that face the country.
-
Editorial:
Hamas's
victory in Palestinian Territories
|
Business
and Economy
|
-
A
National Council of Applied
Economic Research (NCAER) study
said that increased tourists in
India are producing 38.6 million
jobs--half of them indirect. The
tourism sector now accounts of
8.27% of the total number of jobs.
Any growth in tourism clearly
needs massive investments in
infrastructure such as airports,
ports, roads, hotels, and roads.
Strangely, the recently announced
budget did not address this
sector.
-
Petroleum
Minister Murli Deora introduced a
new Petroleum and Natural Gas
Regulatory Board Bill in the Rajya
Sabha (Upper House of the
Parliament) to create a new
regulator of downstream petroleum
and natural gas investments. This
bill will cover refining,
processing, storage,
transportation, distribution,
marketing, and sale of petroleum
and natural gas products. Deora
said that the bill draws from a
Parliamentary Committee
recommendation and that he has
included 47 of the 49 of them. The
Parliamentary Committee had
strongly recommended a regulator,
which will manage a strict code of
conduct in companies. These will
include pipeline access code,
concept of contract carriers,
service obligations of city or
local gas distributors, and
methodology for transportation
tariffs. The former National
Democratic Alliance (NDA)
Government had conceptualized and
introduced a bill called the
Petroleum Regulatory Board Bill.
This bill is repackaged by the
United Progressive Alliance (UPA)
to include natural gas.
-
The
Indian stock market responded very
positively to the budget and all
the good sound bites from the US
President George Bush and Prime
Minister Manmohan Singh. The
Sensex peaked to a lifetime high
of 10,706 but wound down by the
end of the day with still a
lifetime high of 10,626. Analysts
say that profit taking brought the
levels down but many just a few
stocks took the market higher over
what some say irrational
exuberance. Bharathi Televentures,
ONGC (already overpriced), Tata
Power, HDFC Bank, Tata Motors, ITC
(highly overpriced), Tata Steel,
and Maruti took the market high.
Lower taxes for smaller cars,
promised investments in energy and
infrastructure, and tax exemption
on longer term fixed deposits did
the trick for these companies.
|
Terrorism,
Defense, Security and Science &
Technology
|
|
|
|
Hot
Topics
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Featured
Analyses
|
 |
National
Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme
:
Making
Panchayat Raj Institutions Effective |
The
Bill on National Rural Employment
Guarantee Scheme seeks to provide
guaranteed employment to one
member of every rural household
for at least 100 days a year for a
minimum wage of Rs.60 per day. <?xml:namespace
prefix = u1 />
Out of 260 million poor people in
the country, about 200 million
poor people are in rural areas.
People in 45% rural India do not
get work for six months in a year.
|
 |
The
Saga of the Jemaah Islamiah |
 |
Will
Kashmir go the way of Aceh? |
 |
A
Cry for Help |
 |
Watch
the Dragon |
 |
Cage
This "Tiger" |
 |
Dalits
in India |
 |
Was
Jinnah a Secularist? |
 |
Burying
the Howitzer? |
 |
Smoking
Out Smoking |
Featured
Edits
|
 |
Bush,
India, and two degrees of separation |
 |
Between
good nukes and bad nukes lies
enlightened hypocrisy
|
 |
India-US
joint statement |
 |
Need
for a farming budget
|
 |
Three
priorities for St. Petersburg summit
of G8
|
 |
Election
time |
 |
New
Clear Deal |
 |
Water
shortage |
Inscription |
South
Indian Inscriptions |
Ancient
Indian dynasties documented their
administration, significant
developments, grants, and
milestones as inscriptions in
temples. The Archaeological Survey
of India (ASI) has documented
these inscriptions from 1886.
These pages
contain inscriptions from Pallava,
Chola, Pandya, Western Chalukya,
Eastern Chalukya, Rashtrakuta,
Hoyasala, Vijayanagara,
Vishnukundin, Kakatiya, Reddi,
Vaidumba, Chinda, Eastern Ganga,
Gajapathi, Kalchurya, Qutb-Shahi
of Golkonda, and Moghul,
dynasties.
|
|
|
Neighbors
|
-
Ahead
of the March 6 International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
meeting to discuss Iran’s
nuclear weapons program, Iran and
Russia announced that they have
failed to agree on the proposal
for a joint venture to enrich
uranium in Russia. Iran said that
it needed more time to hammer out
a deal with Russia but said that
it will never give up research in
uranium enrichment; this is a key
demand by the world community.
Iran claims that the reason why
the US wants to refer the case to
the United Nations Security
Council is to ensure that the
Russian proposal dies. The
European Union-3, Britain, France,
and Germany said it will meet Iran
in a last ditch attempt on Friday
but expressed little hope. It said
that Iran is recalcitrant in its
negotiations with EU and not
embracing Russia’s proposal
either.
-
In a strongly worded
editorial, the influential
Washington Post warned US
President George Bush not to bank
on “unreliable” Pakistan
President Pervez Musharraf. The
editorial accused Musharraf of
suppressing “secular democratic
parties” but allying himself
“with Muslim extremists.”
"Despite Gen Musharraf's many
promises, Pakistan remains a
deeply unstable country where the
threat of Islamic extremism is
great and growing. Though the
General may be a tactical ally of
the United States against that
threat, his refusal to restore
democracy in his country has only
made it worse. In short, Gen
Musharraf clearly hopes to prolong
his military regime indefinitely,
while continuing to enjoy heavy
political and economic support
from an American President who has
dedicated his administration to
advancing democracy in the Muslim
world” The paper urged Bush not
to be more “credulous” than
most Pakistanis on Musharraf’s
promises.
-
Editorial:
The
Nepal Stalemate
-
Editorial:
Iran's
Nuclear Program
|
|
|
|
|