|
|
-
India, IAEA 2nd round
discussion on civilian and military separation of nuclear facilities went well
but more work is required
-
India plans calibrated moves
with US Administration
-
IAEA agreement is required for
Indo-US civilian nuclear deal and PM says will guarantee continued supply of
nuclear materials with India
|
India and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) met a 2nd time to
discuss nuclear safeguards as a step to fulfilling the Indo-US civilian nuclear
deal and reports suggest that the talks went well and focused on broad
India-specific safeguard issues.
However, agreement is not imminent and India and the IAEA will hold many more
rounds of talks before New Delhi signs a safeguards agreement. In March 2006,
the two sides evolved a plan to separate civilian and military nuclear
facilities and this round takes that discussion forward. As per the March 2006
separation plan, India agreed to include 14 of its 22 thermal nuclear reactors
under international oversight regime in a phased manner. India is also
discussing a nuclear cooperation agreement with the US in parallel.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told Parliament on March 7, 2006 that
India-specific safeguard agreements with the IAEA would protect India against
withdrawal of safeguarded nuclear material from civilian use at any time. It
will also allow the nation to take corrective measures to ensure uninterrupted
operation of its civilian nuclear reactors in the event of disruption of
foreign fuel supplies. However he said that Indian initiatives will be
calibrated with reciprocal US steps. He also confirmed that the US Government
has “accepted this separation plan.” He also asserted earlier that "Should we
not be satisfied that our interests are fully secured, we shall not feel
pressed to move ahead in a pre-determined manner.” Singh also promised the
nation that “Before voluntarily placing our civilian facilities under IAEA
safeguards, we will ensure that all restrictions on India have been lifted. Our
autonomy of decision-making will not be circumscribed in any manner
whatsoever.”
|