|
-
China sees Indo-Sino relations
entering “new phase”
-
India reiterates desire to
develop friendly relationship with China
-
Intelligence agencies
disqualify Chinese companies in port, telecom; lack of transparency in
ownership is seen as reason
|
Indian Minister for Petroleum and Natural Gas Murli Deora met Chinese
President Hu Jintao on the sidelines of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO)
meeting and learnt that China views that its relationship with India has
entered a “new phase.” Jintao convinced Deora that his country was committed to
forging long-term strategic cooperative partnership with India and emphasized
that this was an “established policy.”
India and China are celebrating a “Year of Friendship” and are holding a
series of meetings to enhance bilateral relationship, friendship, reciprocity,
and cooperation. Deora stressed that “Developing friendly relations with China
is an important priority of the Government of India.” He also highlighted that
bilateral relations had acquired a strategic significance for peace, stability,
and development of Asia and the world. India’s
Defense Minister Pranab Mukherjee recently visited China and came away
star-struck and impressed by China’s growth and convinced of its desire for
peace. He was even quoted saying that the visit has bridged the trust deficit.
Mukherjee said “We do believe there is enough strategic space for both of us to
develop. Neither are we a threat to them nor are they a threat to us.” An
important decision that came out that trip was the institutionalized military
exchanges that would include joint exercises.
However, it is still not clear if thorny discussions on China’s “string of
pearls” or naval bases in the Indian Ocean, the proliferation of missile
technology to Pakistan, the naval base in the Andaman Sea, its new port at
Straits of Gwadar, or its steep hike in Defense Budget came up in any of these
discussions. While Indo-Sino relations may be placed in the right trajectory,
it is not clear if there is any movement along that trajectory.
Representing the deep-sense of distrust and uncertainty, Indian security
agencies have denied permission to Hong Kong based Hutchinson Port Holdings to
participate in multi-billion Rupee container terminal projects in Mumbai and
Chennai. They are also parrying the approval for Huwawei Technologies to set up
manufacturing facilities and bidding for core backbone routers. The Navy also
refused permission to Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) to purchase
speedboats from a Chinese firm. Those who look at the business side only
consider cost and loss of investment as parameters in their decision making and
do not look at the lack of transparency on the owners of these companies.
Indo-Sino relations will continue to meander and proceed at a slow pace if the
trust deficit is not truly handled. Mukherjee’s claim to have bridged the trust
deficit with one trip is diplomatic but disingenuous. While India must develop
friendly relations with China, it should also be careful to understand its
moves. In fact, trust is not the only deficit with China. There is also a
deficit among the politicians in the understanding of Chinese moves in Africa,
South America, and Central Asia. The security hurdles raised by the
intelligence agencies and defense is considered opinion.
Sadly, there is no real reason why India and China must not have good
relations. Historically, before the communist onset in China, the two countries
were very close economically, politically, and intellectually. Information,
learning, and religion continued to incessantly flow from India to China. Even
a thousand years ago, nations in India and China exchanged Embassies on a
regular basis.
The communist turn and the 1962 border war after the “Hindi-Chinni Bhai Bhai”
slogan cannot be just forgotten. Adding to this, other serious contentious
moves by China seriously affecting Indian security environment needs to be
considered and understood for bilateral relationship to grow.
|