However, the plan is flawed as conceived.
Firstly, there is a mammoth project underway and extremely inefficiently laid called the East-West and North-South road corridor [Insert Feb 15 news summary] that visualizes a 5,565 kilometers of roads. However, only 232 kilometers have been laid at a cost of USD 3 million per kilometer making it the most expensive road in India (a corporation level road costs less than USD 10,000 a kilometer).
Secondly, the shortage of water in the south and river water flooding in the North and North East has sparked a large debate on river linking. Estimates to build such a system range from USD 100 billion to USD 1 trillion. Apart from political sound bites, there has been no further dialogue on this issue.
Both these projects as well as the new railway corridor project would essentially solve many similar problems. Land rights, optimal passage, right of way, asset protection, acquisition legality, forest management, environmental considerations, construction access, contract negotiation, etc. The question is why aren’t the three projects being considered in one shot but financed differently. After all, it is very likely the principal players involved in the construction will be the same. Instead of creating one authority that will oversee these projects and reduce overhead, the National Highway Authority of India, the Agricultural Ministry, Indian Railways, have to do the jobs thrice over.