www.whatisindia.com
What Is India News Service
Monday, March 27, 2006

India Intelligence Report


  Editorials

  Inscriptions

  Opinions

  University Research

  News Analysis


  Economy
  Places
  States

  Links


Sources
I want News  I'm a Researcher I'm a Policy Maker I'm a Traveler |  I'm an Investor  | I'm an Activist | I'm a Student
 

Surprise! Govt has a Naxal policy

 

Responding to a question in the Parliament, Home Minister Shivraj Patil shocked everyone by tabling a policy, which he says has been in existence for a while. A cornerstone of this secretive policy is to encourage local resistance groups as means to counter the Maoist menace gripping large swathes of India. Only only those in Delhi supposedly prepared the policy without consultations with Chief Ministers, police chiefs, chief secretaries of the affected states.

That would explain many things that have puzzled many analysts.

Firstly, the active support given by the BJP-led Government in Chhattisgarh to the Salwa Judum (peace initiative) even though the plan was conceived a Congressman in Dantewada.

 

Secondly, there was no opposition to the forming of local militia or arming them from the Center.

Thirdly, the naxals attacked the tribals opposing them often brutally because they believed that they were actually attacking the Government as the tribal opponents were seen as instruments of the Government.

Fourthly, since the document's only plan is to create militia, it would explain the lack of coordinated response to coordinated attacks of the Naxals is believable.

From a point of view of policy formulation, strategy, or process of fighting internal forces, this is the worst strategy to follow:

1. A Federal Republic would require equal participation of concerned authorities and not just the center. There is no sharing of information, intelligence, responsibility, or best practices. The whole burden is being shifted to the poor rural population. They are given some weapons and left to defend them.

2. How does Patil plan to manage the after-Naxal scenario? Will he expect the tribal population to give up their guns? From the Pakistan experience in fighting the Soviet Union, such policies will come back to hunt the country in a large way. Even in India, the arming and training of the LTTE created a period of terror in Tamil Nadu, cost the life of a Prime Minister, and the lives of 5000 Indian soldiers. The arming of Village Defense Councils in Kashmir has been a dismal failure because the villager will never have the firepower of a terrorist and will be the first target of any terrorist.

3. How long will Patil sustain this militia? How will he finance them? What is their motivation to fight the terrorists? This is akin to supporting the Maoist terrorists in Nepal because India desires democracy in Nepal. Like India realized in Kashmir, counter-rebels become a law and order problem, which the Government will have to ignore. As the US found out, ignoring the Taliban and Osama because they were fighting the Soviets will come back to hurt their well-being.

Naxalites in India are operating with impunity because of economic, social, and failure of political, law and order, and intelligence mechanisms. They continue to hijack trains, blow up innocent tribals, brutally murder villagers, loot explosives and arms of mining companies, and destroy Government property. Instead of providing adequate security cover to likely targets, perform aggressive patrolling, continuously engage rebel pockets, and developing intelligence networks, Patil wants to transfer responsibility to unable tribals and use them as a fodder against heavily armed, highly motivated, and well networked marauders.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home Page


Archives | Links | Search
About Us | Feedback | Guestbook
© 2005 Copyright What Is India Publishers (P) Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
setstats 1
setstats 1

setstats 1