| |
A Delhi High Court judge dismissed the
Bofors charges filed by the Central
Bureau of Investigation (CBI) chiding
them as a principal would his errant
students saying "it is hoped that this
elite investigating agency will be
more responsible in the future." The
CBI failed to produce the original
documents that are nowhere to be
found-- in Bofors Sweden, the Swedish
Government, or with the Indian
Government! And, this is not
acceptable in Indian law that requires
all documents to be produced in the
original form. Bofors is the most
sought after howitzer weapon in land
armies across the world. Known for his
accuracy and trouble free maintenance,
this Swedish company was the vendor of
choice more than 15 years ago when Mr.
Rajiv Clean Gandhi was the Prime
Minister. Whatever be the faults
heaped on him-- lack of vision,
incompetence, knee-jerk decision
making, lack of understanding of
global issues, etc, he was by Indian
standards a clean politician. So, when
The Hindu published "credible
documents" as evidence of kickbacks
and implicated the Hindujas, a
well-respected business family, the
Indian public lapped it up. This was
the first time the Indian media
exposed to the nation political
corruption at the highest level. Many
Indians felt proud that India had
finally emerged from its
oligarchy-style of functioning
democracy to a true democracy with an
assertive fourth estate as envisioned
by the founding fathers of the modern
nation. While the investigation went
on for the next 15 years, most of
those accused-- the then Prime
Minister, the then Defense Secretary,
defense agent Win Chadha, etc. are
dead. Last year, the High Court
absolved Rajiv Gandhi of any
culpability to this scam.
For those who are not aware, Indian
politics and peoples were not so
politically divided along religious,
caste, language, economic, and water
lines as they are today. The Bofors
case brought about large scale
cynicism in society. This sea change
in public attitude brought to the fore
undeserving politicians who
capitalized on this confusion and cast
the first stones of political anarchy.
Interestingly, many of these
politicians are part of the current
ruling Federal coalition led by Rajiv
Gandhi's Congress. Like what happens
in public life, many jumped on the
bandwagon asking for the resignation
of the Government. Whatever his
faults, Rajiv Gandhi being an
honorable man, finally did resign. The
successors nearly bankrupted the
country till the serving Prime
Minister, under threat from the World
Bank, stepped in to reform the economy
and bringing the License Raj to an
end.
The kickbacks cited was Rs. 64
crores. The cost of the investigation
is estimated to be about Rs. 250
crores. Therefore, by pure financial
questioning, it does not take a genius
to determine we have lost a tremendous
amount of money. However, there are
bigger questions. Why did we start the
investigation? Was it to reform the
defense procurement process so we can
stem corruption or was it political
vendetta? Was the investigation
sponsored to book the guilty or was it
more like a political negotiating
tool? Was the CBI asked to finish the
investigation or were they asked to
step on and off the gas when
politically convenient? Was the CBI
given investigation autonomy or was it
being pulled by different political
puppet masters?
Unfortunately, Bofors was a
convenient whipping child for
everyone. For the Narashima Rao's
Congress camp, this was means to keep
Sonia away from the top post. For the
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) this was
a ruse to highlight corruption in the
Congress; if Mr. Rajiv Clean Gandhi
was corrupt how bad are the others?
For the Communists, this was a ruse to
vilify the Hindujas who represented
the Capitalists. VP Singh used this
opportunity to claim the top post.
Opportunists like Mr. Lalu Prasad
Yadav used Bofors to portray how
"Brahmical" corruption was stealing
resources and propel himself to power.
For the Sonia Congress camp, the
nullification of Bofors is a means to
prove the relevance of the
Nehru-Indira Gandhi line as the
stabilizing and incorruptible force so
Sonia can be PM. For Nehru-Indira
Gandhi acolytes, the demolition of the
Bofors case was important to reinforce
their sycophancy.
All who fished in the violent
waters of Bofors won. Narashima Rao
ran his full five years only to be
dumped even at death and never to
return. The BJP wormed its way into
power and continued to use Bofors as a
stick to keep the Congress away. The
Communists, who continue to be bereft
of new world realities, ideas, and
positive intentions, continued to run
Kerala and West Bengal into an
economical abyss. VP Singh got what he
wished for; a chance to steer the
Indian economy into the rocks and
Indian public life into chaos. Laloo
got his wish to have an equal
opportunity at embezzling the Indian
economy. Interestingly now, he refuses
to quit whether he is charged with
embezzlement or incompetence the same
charges that Rajiv Gandhi took to
heart and quit responsibly. Sonia's
camp is now ecstatic that soon she can
stop pretending that she is not the
real Prime Minister. For the
dynastical sycophants of the
Congress, this is party time to caucus
and come up with newer ways to
placate, pander, and appease the
Nehru-Indira Gandhi clan.
Caught in the middle was the CBI,
the Judiciary, the Indian economy and
social spending, defense procurement
and national security, and
development. Having lost its most high
level case on technical grounds, the
CBI is a discredited organization not
having gotten a single conviction so
far. The Judiciary at the High Court
level apparently has lost its
credibility too. Earlier, the BJP
pointed out instances when the courts
appeared to be at the behest of
Congress-dominated Federal
Governments. The Indian economy has
suffered because monies that could
have been used to raise new schools,
hospitals, better roads, power,
infrastructure, has been squandered
like throwing water in a desert.
Defense procurement is in a state of
suspended animation and consequently
important decisions on aircraft
carriers, nuclear submarines,
long-range fighter aircrafts, aircraft
jet trainers, etc have been submerged
under political dirt. This has gotten
to a point that even urgent
procurements during a war, as happened
during the Kargil war, is politicized.
There is no inclusion of the
opposition, when they decide to
participate in policy making, in
decision making. Of course,
inauguration of the most advanced and
prestigious naval base in India by the
ruling party president alone with the
presence of only the ruling party
members does not help.
While we are politicking, energized
by a blossoming economy, China is
building a huge navy, developed close
relations with Myanmar and built an
advanced naval outpost close to the
Nicobar Islands, built a naval base
near the Straits of
Hormutz, and now planning to
build an advanced port for Sri Lanka.
Pakistan has taken advantage of our
strained relations with Nepal and has
now help the Royal Nepalese Army to
fight the Maoist terrorists.
Bangladesh is arming insurgents and
terrorists to fight India and is
facilitating their infiltration into
north eastern India.
Indian politicians seem to forget
that there is a difference between
politics and governance; enemy and
political rivalry; those who serve for
political power and those who serve
the nation in the bureaucracy,
services, security, investigative
agencies, and police. One cannot ask
for a sea change in attitude of
politicians overnight but can we at
least norm as a nation in how we
behave and work with each other? This
is where the role of the President can
be a major stabilizing force.
Since we now have Presidents who
are accomplished and not political
yes-men (giants among men like Messers
R. Venkatraman, Shankar Dayal Sharma,
Narayanan, and Abdul Kalam) can we not
expect them to lead impartial
inquiries and investigations? Should
we not at least now move the roles of
these important organizations under
them? Clearly, the Constitution of the
country does not allow such a role for
the President. Since the Constitution
is not working as it should, are we
not empowered to change the
Constitution as necessary? |
|