www.whatisindia.com

What is India news service
Tuesday, March 13, 2007


 

South Indian Inscriptions


 

APPENDIX II

Additions and corrections

by

N. Lakshminarayan Rao, m.a.,

[As the contents of some of the inscriptions in this volume as read by the late Mr. Ramayya Pantulu, the editor, were found to differ in some respects from their brief English summaries as embodied in the Annual Reports on South Indian Epigraphy it became necessary to verify Mr. Pantulu’s readings of such records with their impressions.  The corrections suggested here – except of the typographical and other minor errors – related mainly to these inscriptions.]

Page

General No.

Line of text.

For

Read

219

410

-

The A.R. No. 607 (b) of 1909 given here is registered as No. 608 in the Annual Report for  1910.

223

418

Int.

The donor is probably in Eruva chief as in No. 417.

231

433

10

Not read in the published text

231

433

11

Not read in the published text.

238

443

 

For the published text under this number substitute : -

238

443

10

[The date cited in the record corresponds to A.D. 1278, July 2,  Saturday ; ’38.  As a result of this correction, the details of date and the equivalent given in App. I against Nos. 443, 444 and 445 hold good only for the last two.]

240

448

50-a

Omitted in the published text

 

240

448

50-b

Omitted in the published text.

 

240

448

68

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

69

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

70

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

71

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

72

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

73

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

74

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

75

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

77

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

78

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

79

Said to be illegible

 

240

448

80

Said to be illegible

 

253

468

Int.

Peddaya Sahini gave lands to the temple of Visvanatha-Mahadeva who were the officers of Rudraraja.

Peddaya-Sahini, who were the officers of Rudra . . raja, gave lands to the temple of Visvanatha-Mahadeva.

269

500

-

Oppicherla

Vopiicherla

273

505

-

The reigning king was Kakatiya Prataparudra.

 

284

527

-

Sattenapalle

Narasaraopet

284

527

-

Kakatiya Prataparudra is mentioned as the reigning king in the earlier record bearing the Saka year 1213, the very first year of the king’s reign, while the later record bears the Saka date 1241 which also falls well within the reign of the king.

285

527

17

Remove the dots at the end.

 

287

531

-

Magallu

Mogallu

291

538

-

Ivani

Imani

307

559

10

Numbers of verses are not found in the original up to verse 8.

310

560

29-a

Omitted in the published text

 

310

560

29-b

Omitted  in the published text.

 

315

570

-

Purushottapattanam

Purushottamapattanam

317

573

-

Same

Bapatla

322

583

19

Not read in the published text.

 

322

583

20

Not read in the published text.

 

322

583

21

Not read in the published text.

 

322

583

22

Not read in the published text.

 

326

590

-

Chiluvuru

Chilumuru

326

591

9

Said to be damaged.

 

326

591

10

Said to be damaged.

 

326

591

12[1]

Said to be damaged.

 

328

596

-

Peddamudiyam

Peddamudiyam

330

600

-

Jammalamadugu

Kamalapuram

360

603

-

Jammalamadugu

Kamalapuram

332

604

-

In the absence of the same Chola or of any known ruler of the Chola family it does not seem proper to consider this inscription as a Chola record.  The late Rai Bahadur Venkayya was inclined to take the king Srivallabha of the record as a Chalukya.

333

606

-

Proddatur

Kamalapuram

333

606

-

Text mentions Erikal-Mutturaju.

 

335

613

-

Muttukuru

Mutukuru

336

617

-

Praddatur taluk

Kamalapuram taluk.

336

617

9a

Not read in the published text

 

338

623

Int.

Lonkula

Lonkula

341

636

-

Cuddapah

Proddatur

343

640

Int. 

Lonkulas

Lonkulas

351

651

-

S. 101[3] (h) 17th year of Anantavarmadeva

S. 101[2] (13th year of Anantavarmadeva)

352

655

-

Anakapalle

Bimlipatam

355

662

-

[The date printed at the top of the text of this inscription is wrong for 1141 which is what is found in the text.  The inscription therefore should be read after No. 713]

359

675

-

(A. R. No. 681 of 1926)

(A. R. No. 680 of 1926)

368

702

5

Do.

Do.

373

715

Int.

Nidumjeruvu

Nidumjeruvu.

374

718

4a

Omitted in the published text

 

385

739

6a

Omitted in the published text.

 

387

742

11

Lines 12 to 22 of this number do not form part of this record, their palaeography indicating a much later date.  They must be read after line 12 of Gen. No. 776 (A. R. No. 560 of 1912) with the following corrections : -

393

752

-

Tenali

Bapatla

395

754

-

Tenali

Bapatla

396

754

11a

Omitted in the published text

 

407

776

-

Lines 12 onwards of the published text of Gen. No. 742 as corrected above have to be read after line 12 of this Number.

Appendix I

p. ii

70

-

Add su. Before 14.

 

p. ii.

71

-

For the English equivalent and remarks substitute the following : - ‘The English equivalent of the dates probably A. D. 1103, January 1, Thursday.  The letters in 1. 4 of the text would indicate that the tithi may be saptami which was current on the date given above : f. d. t. ’80.

p. viii

207

-

Omit the last sentence beginning with ‘It is likely’ etc.

p. xiv

332

-

Omit the last sentence beginning with ‘The cyclic year’ etc.

p. xvi.

367

-

For Friday read Saturday and delete the last sentence.

p. xviii

426

-

For the entry found under this number substitute Saka 1192, Pramoduta, Ashadha, ba. 15, Ma (Mandavara = Saturday) = A. D. 1270, July 19, Saturday ; ’64.

[1] Some more lines after this line are lost.

Home Page


Archives | Links | Search
About Us | Feedback | Guestbook

© 2007 Copyright What Is India Publishers (P) Ltd. All Rights Reserved.